DEEP AUTOMOTIVE,BEED vs. ITO WARD 1(5), AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamore

section 250(6) of Income Tax Act. (Rs. 12,73,140/-) 2) That the learned Assessing Officer erred in law and on facts in making an addition of Rs 33,17,566/- to the income of the assessee on account of alleged undervaluation of closing stock due to non-exclusion of GST as per ICDS-II, without appreciating the fact

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD