BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

50 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 173clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai204Delhi115Karnataka101Mumbai79Chandigarh61Pune50Kolkata39Amritsar35Jaipur30Bangalore30Surat19Ahmedabad19Lucknow18Indore17Rajkot9Hyderabad7Agra5Patna5Telangana5Visakhapatnam5Cuttack4SC3Calcutta3Ranchi2Jabalpur2Raipur2Andhra Pradesh1Allahabad1Rajasthan1Cochin1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 234E176Section 200(3)72Section 200A(1)(c)48TDS40Section 200A32Section 25032Section 20024Charitable Trust24Rectification u/s 154

VARDHAMAN NAGARI SAHAKARI PATH SANSTHA LTD,AURANGABAD vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(5), AURANGABAD

ITA 475/PUN/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No. 475/Pun/2020 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-2012 Vardhaman Nagari Sahakari Pathsanstha Ltd. Mahatma Gandhi Rd.,Vaijapur, Aurangabad–423701. . . . . . . . अपऩलधथी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(5), Aurangabad. . . . . . . . प्रत्यथी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Shri Hari Krishan Revenue By : Shri M. G. Jasnani सपिवधई की तधरऩख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 08/09/2022 घोर्णध की तधरऩख / Date Of Pronouncement : 09/09/2022 आदेश / Order Per G. D. Padmahshali, Am; This Appeal Challenges The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Aurangabad [For Short “Cit(A)”] Dt. 19/07/2019 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which Ascended Out Of Assessment Order Dt. 31/12/2018 Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S 147By The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(5) Aurangabad [For Short “Ao”] For Assessment Year [For Short “Ay”] 2011-12. Itat-Pune Page 1 Of 20

For Appellant: Shri Hari KrishanFor Respondent: Shri M. G. Jasnani
Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147

Showing 1–20 of 50 · Page 1 of 3

24
Limitation/Time-bar18
Section 271E13
Section 5710
Section 148
Section 250

173 ITD 606. 6. Per contra, the learned departmental representative [for short “DR”] taken us through each of the decision relied by the appellant, and has submitted that, in so far as the decision in “CIT Vs Premkumar Arjundas Luthra” (Supra) is concerned it was originated out of the order co- ordinate Pune Bench wherein the Ld. CIT(A) while

PRASANNA SHRIKANT PATANKAR,SATARA vs. ITO WD NO - 04, SATARA

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1693/PUN/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No.1693/Pun/2025 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2015-16 Prasanna Shrikant Patankar V The Income Tax Officer, No.35, Raviwar Peth, S. Ward-4, Satara. Azad Chowk, Karad, Satara – 415110. Maharashtra. Pan: Alypp1014A Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Sachin P. Kumar Revenue By Shri Aviyogi Ambadkar – Addl.Cit Date Of Hearing 13/11/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 28/11/2025

Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250

173/-. Aggrieved by the assessment order, Assessee filed appeal before the ld.CIT(A) on 07.12.2024 as evident from Form No.35. 3. Ld.CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee on account of delay of 604 days. 3 ITA No.1693/PUN/2025 [A] 3.1 Assessee had filed an Affidavit before ld.CIT(A) for condonation of Delay part of which has been reproduced

GENERAL INDUSTRIAL CONTROS LTD.,PUNE vs. DCIT CIRCLE 8, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the order of the CIT(A) is set aside, and the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 38/PUN/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Apr 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamore

Section 115BSection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)

section 115BAA of the Income Tax Act. The said fact was mentioned by the Assessee in the Audit Report also. These details were filed in response to the notice issued by CPC. However, CPC passed an order on 13.11.2022 ignoring the Assessee’s submission. Assessee filed a rectification application which was rejected. Assessee filed Form-10-IC electronically

M/S JYOTI SOLUTIONWORKS PVT. LTD,,PUNE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 8, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2317/PUN/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Jul 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2317/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2009-10

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B PhadkeFor Respondent: Date of hearing
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 5

section 5 of the Limitation Act may also look into the prima facie merits of an appeal. A liberal approach may be adopted when some plausible cause for delay is shown. Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Inder Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 21.03.2025 (2025 INSC 382) condoned delay of 1537 days sub-serving

SHAHU SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL, LATUR,LATUR vs. ACIT (EXMP.) CIRCLE, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 951/PUN/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 Jan 2025AY 2020-21
For Appellant: \nDepartment by
Section 10Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 56Section 57

delay condonation application with\nHon'ble Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune.\nTechnical Mistake in submission of ITR:\nAssessee trust is a charitable trust exclusively engaged in imparting\nof recognized educational courses. Moreover, the institution is\nsubstantially financed by the Government, therefore, whole of the\nincome of the trust is exempted u/s. 10(23C) (iiiab) of the Act.\nTherefore

NIKITA RAMESHCHANDRA SHANKARWALA,SANGLI vs. ITO WARD 5, SANGLI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1379/PUN/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Jul 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Dr. Manish Boradआयकर अपील सं. /Ita No.1379/Pun/2025 धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2022-2023 Vs Ito, Ward 5, Nikita Rameshchandra Shankarwala, Sangli B/9 Block No. 4, Ratanshinagar, Near Amarai Garden, Sangli- 416416 Maharashtra Pan-Bnips8905A Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Kishore PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Deepak Kumar
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250Section 89

173 on account of delay in filing Form 10E by the appellant. 2. The learned IT authorities erred in law and on facts in denying the relief u/s 89 solely on account of non-filing of Form 10E in time. Appellant contend that Income Tax Act, 1961 does not specify any strict time limit for filing Form 10E thereby action

AUDUMBAR SADGURU NIWAS FOUNDATION,PUNE vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PUNE

In the result, both the appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 1034/PUN/2025[2026-27]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Oct 2025AY 2026-27

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Shubham N. RathiFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G

173 days in filing of this appeal before the Tribunal for which the assessee has filed an affidavit explaining the reasons for such delay. On perusal of the same, we are satisfied that the delay in filing of appeal is not intentional or deliberate but has occurred for the reasons mentioned in the affidavit. After hearing both the sides

AUDUMBAR SADGURU NIWAS FOUNDATION,PARBHANI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PUNE

In the result, both the appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 1035/PUN/2025[2026-27]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Oct 2025AY 2026-27

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Shubham N. RathiFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G

173 days in filing of this appeal before the Tribunal for which the assessee has filed an affidavit explaining the reasons for such delay. On perusal of the same, we are satisfied that the delay in filing of appeal is not intentional or deliberate but has occurred for the reasons mentioned in the affidavit. After hearing both the sides

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALGOAN vs. SUNIL RAMNARAYAN MANTRI, JALGAON

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 269/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Nov 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Sanket M. JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 143(3)Section 269TSection 271ESection 275(1)(c)

173, Navi Peth, 2nd Floor, of Income Tax, Saraswati Bhavan, M.G. Road, Vs. Circle -1, Jalgaon Jalgaon – 425001 PAN : AAQPM9214J अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Assessee by : Shri Sanket M. Joshi Department by : Shri Arvind Desai Date of hearing : 24-10-2024 Date of 29-11-2024 Pronouncement : आदेश / ORDER PER ASTHA CHANDRA, JM : The appeal filed by the Revenue

DADASAHEB VITTHALRAO URHE,PUNE vs. INCOM TAX OFFICER, TDS, PUNE, PUNE

ITA 1299/PUN/2023[2014-15 (Q2-26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Feb 2024

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीलसं. / Ita No. 1286 To 1309/Pun/2023 / Assessment Year : 2013-14 To 2015-16 Dadasaheb Vittalrao Urhe 5, Abhijeet Engineers, Panchwati Colony, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune-410506 Pan:Aaapu9881D . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Income Tax Officer, Tds, Pune. . . . . . . .प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. Dr’] सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 28/02/2024 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 29/02/2024 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Twenty Four Appeals Of The Assessee Are Assailed Against Respective Orders Of First Appellate Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [For Short ‘Nfac’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short ‘The Act’], Which Ascended Out Of Respective Orders Of Intimation/Rectification Processed By The Cit/Cpc-Tds, Pune [For Short ‘Ao’] For Various Quarters Pertaining To The Assessment Years [For Short ‘Ay’] 2013-14 To 2015-16. 2. Since The Facts & Solitary Issue Involved In This Bunch Of Appeals Are Identical, On The Request Of Rival Parties, For The Sake Of Brevity These Are Heard Together For A Common & Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 250

condone the delay holding that ‘none should be deprived of an adjudication on merits unless it is found that the litigant deliberately delayed the filing of appeal.’ 2. Without reproducing the grounds of appeal, it shall suffice to state that, the present bunch of appeal seeks to adjudicate dual issue of authorisation of levy of fees u/s 234E for default

DADASAHEB VITTHALRAO URHE,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, PUNE, PUNE

ITA 1306/PUN/2023[2015-16 (Q4-26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Feb 2024

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीलसं. / Ita No. 1286 To 1309/Pun/2023 / Assessment Year : 2013-14 To 2015-16 Dadasaheb Vittalrao Urhe 5, Abhijeet Engineers, Panchwati Colony, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune-410506 Pan:Aaapu9881D . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Income Tax Officer, Tds, Pune. . . . . . . .प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. Dr’] सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 28/02/2024 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 29/02/2024 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Twenty Four Appeals Of The Assessee Are Assailed Against Respective Orders Of First Appellate Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [For Short ‘Nfac’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short ‘The Act’], Which Ascended Out Of Respective Orders Of Intimation/Rectification Processed By The Cit/Cpc-Tds, Pune [For Short ‘Ao’] For Various Quarters Pertaining To The Assessment Years [For Short ‘Ay’] 2013-14 To 2015-16. 2. Since The Facts & Solitary Issue Involved In This Bunch Of Appeals Are Identical, On The Request Of Rival Parties, For The Sake Of Brevity These Are Heard Together For A Common & Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 250

condone the delay holding that ‘none should be deprived of an adjudication on merits unless it is found that the litigant deliberately delayed the filing of appeal.’ 2. Without reproducing the grounds of appeal, it shall suffice to state that, the present bunch of appeal seeks to adjudicate dual issue of authorisation of levy of fees u/s 234E for default

DADASAHEB VITTHALRAO URHE,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, PUNE, PUNE

ITA 1305/PUN/2023[2015-16 (Q3-26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Feb 2024

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीलसं. / Ita No. 1286 To 1309/Pun/2023 / Assessment Year : 2013-14 To 2015-16 Dadasaheb Vittalrao Urhe 5, Abhijeet Engineers, Panchwati Colony, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune-410506 Pan:Aaapu9881D . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Income Tax Officer, Tds, Pune. . . . . . . .प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. Dr’] सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 28/02/2024 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 29/02/2024 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Twenty Four Appeals Of The Assessee Are Assailed Against Respective Orders Of First Appellate Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [For Short ‘Nfac’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short ‘The Act’], Which Ascended Out Of Respective Orders Of Intimation/Rectification Processed By The Cit/Cpc-Tds, Pune [For Short ‘Ao’] For Various Quarters Pertaining To The Assessment Years [For Short ‘Ay’] 2013-14 To 2015-16. 2. Since The Facts & Solitary Issue Involved In This Bunch Of Appeals Are Identical, On The Request Of Rival Parties, For The Sake Of Brevity These Are Heard Together For A Common & Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 250

condone the delay holding that ‘none should be deprived of an adjudication on merits unless it is found that the litigant deliberately delayed the filing of appeal.’ 2. Without reproducing the grounds of appeal, it shall suffice to state that, the present bunch of appeal seeks to adjudicate dual issue of authorisation of levy of fees u/s 234E for default

DADASAHEB VITTHALRAO URHE ,PUNE vs. ITO, TDS PUNE , PUNE

ITA 1307/PUN/2023[2015-16 Q1 (FORM 24Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Feb 2024

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीलसं. / Ita No. 1286 To 1309/Pun/2023 / Assessment Year : 2013-14 To 2015-16 Dadasaheb Vittalrao Urhe 5, Abhijeet Engineers, Panchwati Colony, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune-410506 Pan:Aaapu9881D . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Income Tax Officer, Tds, Pune. . . . . . . .प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. Dr’] सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 28/02/2024 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 29/02/2024 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Twenty Four Appeals Of The Assessee Are Assailed Against Respective Orders Of First Appellate Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [For Short ‘Nfac’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short ‘The Act’], Which Ascended Out Of Respective Orders Of Intimation/Rectification Processed By The Cit/Cpc-Tds, Pune [For Short ‘Ao’] For Various Quarters Pertaining To The Assessment Years [For Short ‘Ay’] 2013-14 To 2015-16. 2. Since The Facts & Solitary Issue Involved In This Bunch Of Appeals Are Identical, On The Request Of Rival Parties, For The Sake Of Brevity These Are Heard Together For A Common & Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 250

condone the delay holding that ‘none should be deprived of an adjudication on merits unless it is found that the litigant deliberately delayed the filing of appeal.’ 2. Without reproducing the grounds of appeal, it shall suffice to state that, the present bunch of appeal seeks to adjudicate dual issue of authorisation of levy of fees u/s 234E for default

DADASAHEB VITTHALRAO URHE PROPRIETOR ABHIJEET ENGINEERS ,PUNE vs. ITO, TDS PUNE , PUNE

ITA 1308/PUN/2023[2015-16 Q2 (FORM 24Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Feb 2024

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीलसं. / Ita No. 1286 To 1309/Pun/2023 / Assessment Year : 2013-14 To 2015-16 Dadasaheb Vittalrao Urhe 5, Abhijeet Engineers, Panchwati Colony, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune-410506 Pan:Aaapu9881D . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Income Tax Officer, Tds, Pune. . . . . . . .प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. Dr’] सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 28/02/2024 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 29/02/2024 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Twenty Four Appeals Of The Assessee Are Assailed Against Respective Orders Of First Appellate Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [For Short ‘Nfac’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short ‘The Act’], Which Ascended Out Of Respective Orders Of Intimation/Rectification Processed By The Cit/Cpc-Tds, Pune [For Short ‘Ao’] For Various Quarters Pertaining To The Assessment Years [For Short ‘Ay’] 2013-14 To 2015-16. 2. Since The Facts & Solitary Issue Involved In This Bunch Of Appeals Are Identical, On The Request Of Rival Parties, For The Sake Of Brevity These Are Heard Together For A Common & Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 250

condone the delay holding that ‘none should be deprived of an adjudication on merits unless it is found that the litigant deliberately delayed the filing of appeal.’ 2. Without reproducing the grounds of appeal, it shall suffice to state that, the present bunch of appeal seeks to adjudicate dual issue of authorisation of levy of fees u/s 234E for default

DADASAHEB VITTHALRAO URHE,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, PUNE, PUNE

ITA 1298/PUN/2023[2014-15 (Q1-26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Feb 2024

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीलसं. / Ita No. 1286 To 1309/Pun/2023 / Assessment Year : 2013-14 To 2015-16 Dadasaheb Vittalrao Urhe 5, Abhijeet Engineers, Panchwati Colony, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune-410506 Pan:Aaapu9881D . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Income Tax Officer, Tds, Pune. . . . . . . .प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. Dr’] सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 28/02/2024 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 29/02/2024 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Twenty Four Appeals Of The Assessee Are Assailed Against Respective Orders Of First Appellate Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [For Short ‘Nfac’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short ‘The Act’], Which Ascended Out Of Respective Orders Of Intimation/Rectification Processed By The Cit/Cpc-Tds, Pune [For Short ‘Ao’] For Various Quarters Pertaining To The Assessment Years [For Short ‘Ay’] 2013-14 To 2015-16. 2. Since The Facts & Solitary Issue Involved In This Bunch Of Appeals Are Identical, On The Request Of Rival Parties, For The Sake Of Brevity These Are Heard Together For A Common & Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 250

condone the delay holding that ‘none should be deprived of an adjudication on merits unless it is found that the litigant deliberately delayed the filing of appeal.’ 2. Without reproducing the grounds of appeal, it shall suffice to state that, the present bunch of appeal seeks to adjudicate dual issue of authorisation of levy of fees u/s 234E for default

DADASAHEB VITTHALRAO URHE,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, PUNE, PUNE

ITA 1300/PUN/2023[2014-15 (Q3-26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Feb 2024

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीलसं. / Ita No. 1286 To 1309/Pun/2023 / Assessment Year : 2013-14 To 2015-16 Dadasaheb Vittalrao Urhe 5, Abhijeet Engineers, Panchwati Colony, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune-410506 Pan:Aaapu9881D . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Income Tax Officer, Tds, Pune. . . . . . . .प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. Dr’] सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 28/02/2024 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 29/02/2024 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Twenty Four Appeals Of The Assessee Are Assailed Against Respective Orders Of First Appellate Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [For Short ‘Nfac’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short ‘The Act’], Which Ascended Out Of Respective Orders Of Intimation/Rectification Processed By The Cit/Cpc-Tds, Pune [For Short ‘Ao’] For Various Quarters Pertaining To The Assessment Years [For Short ‘Ay’] 2013-14 To 2015-16. 2. Since The Facts & Solitary Issue Involved In This Bunch Of Appeals Are Identical, On The Request Of Rival Parties, For The Sake Of Brevity These Are Heard Together For A Common & Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 250

condone the delay holding that ‘none should be deprived of an adjudication on merits unless it is found that the litigant deliberately delayed the filing of appeal.’ 2. Without reproducing the grounds of appeal, it shall suffice to state that, the present bunch of appeal seeks to adjudicate dual issue of authorisation of levy of fees u/s 234E for default

DADASAHEB VITTHALRAO URHE,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, PUNE, PUNE

ITA 1304/PUN/2023[2015-16 (Q2-26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Feb 2024

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीलसं. / Ita No. 1286 To 1309/Pun/2023 / Assessment Year : 2013-14 To 2015-16 Dadasaheb Vittalrao Urhe 5, Abhijeet Engineers, Panchwati Colony, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune-410506 Pan:Aaapu9881D . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Income Tax Officer, Tds, Pune. . . . . . . .प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. Dr’] सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 28/02/2024 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 29/02/2024 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Twenty Four Appeals Of The Assessee Are Assailed Against Respective Orders Of First Appellate Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [For Short ‘Nfac’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short ‘The Act’], Which Ascended Out Of Respective Orders Of Intimation/Rectification Processed By The Cit/Cpc-Tds, Pune [For Short ‘Ao’] For Various Quarters Pertaining To The Assessment Years [For Short ‘Ay’] 2013-14 To 2015-16. 2. Since The Facts & Solitary Issue Involved In This Bunch Of Appeals Are Identical, On The Request Of Rival Parties, For The Sake Of Brevity These Are Heard Together For A Common & Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 250

condone the delay holding that ‘none should be deprived of an adjudication on merits unless it is found that the litigant deliberately delayed the filing of appeal.’ 2. Without reproducing the grounds of appeal, it shall suffice to state that, the present bunch of appeal seeks to adjudicate dual issue of authorisation of levy of fees u/s 234E for default

DADASAHEB VITTHALRAO URHE,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, PUNE, PUNE

ITA 1295/PUN/2023[2014-15 ( Q1-27EQ)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Feb 2024

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीलसं. / Ita No. 1286 To 1309/Pun/2023 / Assessment Year : 2013-14 To 2015-16 Dadasaheb Vittalrao Urhe 5, Abhijeet Engineers, Panchwati Colony, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune-410506 Pan:Aaapu9881D . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Income Tax Officer, Tds, Pune. . . . . . . .प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. Dr’] सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 28/02/2024 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 29/02/2024 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Twenty Four Appeals Of The Assessee Are Assailed Against Respective Orders Of First Appellate Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [For Short ‘Nfac’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short ‘The Act’], Which Ascended Out Of Respective Orders Of Intimation/Rectification Processed By The Cit/Cpc-Tds, Pune [For Short ‘Ao’] For Various Quarters Pertaining To The Assessment Years [For Short ‘Ay’] 2013-14 To 2015-16. 2. Since The Facts & Solitary Issue Involved In This Bunch Of Appeals Are Identical, On The Request Of Rival Parties, For The Sake Of Brevity These Are Heard Together For A Common & Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 250

condone the delay holding that ‘none should be deprived of an adjudication on merits unless it is found that the litigant deliberately delayed the filing of appeal.’ 2. Without reproducing the grounds of appeal, it shall suffice to state that, the present bunch of appeal seeks to adjudicate dual issue of authorisation of levy of fees u/s 234E for default

DADASAHEB VITTHALRAO URHE,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, PUNE, PUNE

ITA 1296/PUN/2023[2014-15 (Q2-27EQ)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Feb 2024

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीलसं. / Ita No. 1286 To 1309/Pun/2023 / Assessment Year : 2013-14 To 2015-16 Dadasaheb Vittalrao Urhe 5, Abhijeet Engineers, Panchwati Colony, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune-410506 Pan:Aaapu9881D . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Income Tax Officer, Tds, Pune. . . . . . . .प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. Dr’] सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 28/02/2024 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 29/02/2024 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Twenty Four Appeals Of The Assessee Are Assailed Against Respective Orders Of First Appellate Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [For Short ‘Nfac’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short ‘The Act’], Which Ascended Out Of Respective Orders Of Intimation/Rectification Processed By The Cit/Cpc-Tds, Pune [For Short ‘Ao’] For Various Quarters Pertaining To The Assessment Years [For Short ‘Ay’] 2013-14 To 2015-16. 2. Since The Facts & Solitary Issue Involved In This Bunch Of Appeals Are Identical, On The Request Of Rival Parties, For The Sake Of Brevity These Are Heard Together For A Common & Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 250

condone the delay holding that ‘none should be deprived of an adjudication on merits unless it is found that the litigant deliberately delayed the filing of appeal.’ 2. Without reproducing the grounds of appeal, it shall suffice to state that, the present bunch of appeal seeks to adjudicate dual issue of authorisation of levy of fees u/s 234E for default

DADASAHEB VITTHALRAO URHE,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, PUNE, PUNE

ITA 1293/PUN/2023[2013-14 (Q3-27EQ)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Feb 2024

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीलसं. / Ita No. 1286 To 1309/Pun/2023 / Assessment Year : 2013-14 To 2015-16 Dadasaheb Vittalrao Urhe 5, Abhijeet Engineers, Panchwati Colony, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune-410506 Pan:Aaapu9881D . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बनाम / V/S. Income Tax Officer, Tds, Pune. . . . . . . .प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. Dr’] सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 28/02/2024 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 29/02/2024 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Twenty Four Appeals Of The Assessee Are Assailed Against Respective Orders Of First Appellate Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [For Short ‘Nfac’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short ‘The Act’], Which Ascended Out Of Respective Orders Of Intimation/Rectification Processed By The Cit/Cpc-Tds, Pune [For Short ‘Ao’] For Various Quarters Pertaining To The Assessment Years [For Short ‘Ay’] 2013-14 To 2015-16. 2. Since The Facts & Solitary Issue Involved In This Bunch Of Appeals Are Identical, On The Request Of Rival Parties, For The Sake Of Brevity These Are Heard Together For A Common & Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Mr Rohit Tapadiya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 250

condone the delay holding that ‘none should be deprived of an adjudication on merits unless it is found that the litigant deliberately delayed the filing of appeal.’ 2. Without reproducing the grounds of appeal, it shall suffice to state that, the present bunch of appeal seeks to adjudicate dual issue of authorisation of levy of fees u/s 234E for default