INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD HINGOLI CAMP AT PARBHANI, PARBHANI vs. RAJARAM RAMSWARUP JAJU, SELU PARBHANI
In the result, the cross objection filed by the assessee in C
ITA 1882/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune07 Mar 2025AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1882/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2016-17 Ito, Ward Hingoli Camp At Vs. Rajaram Ramswarup Parbhani, Parbhani. Jaju, 223, Jaju Industries Atre Nagar, Selu, Parbhani- 431503. Pan : Aakpj4951H Appellant Respondent C.O. No.35//Pun/2024 (Arising Out Of Ita No.1882/Pun/2024) िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2016-17 Rajaram Ramswarup Jaju, Vs. Ito, Ward Hingoli 223, Jaju Industries Atre Camp At Parbhani, Nagar, Selu, Parbhani. Parbhani- 431503. Pan : Aakpj4951H Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Shri Basavaraj Hiremath Assessee By : Shri Anand R. Partani & Shri Darshan R. Gattani Date Of Hearing : 09.12.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.03.2025 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Dated 15.07.2024 Passed By Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac For The Assessment
For Appellant: Shri Anand R. Partani &For Respondent: Shri Basavaraj Hiremath
Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 69A
condone the delay of 61 days and admit the cross objection for adjudication.
6. Ld. AR appearing from the side of the assessee submitted before us that the order passed by Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC is justified.
However, it was also submitted that the assessee has raised legal ground no.2 before Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC which was not decided
