BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 148Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh5Kolkata4Lucknow4Pune3Bangalore3Delhi2Cochin1Chennai1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 2509Section 1475Section 1483Condonation of Delay3Limitation/Time-bar2

ABDULWAHID ABDULKARIM QURESHI,AHMEDNAGAR vs. ITO, WARD 2, AHMEDNAGAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 894/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Sanket M. JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 147Section 250

condone the delay of 50 days in filing the appeal and admit the appeals for adjudication in light of judgments of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag & Anr. Vs. Mst. Katiji & Ors. reported in (1987) 2 SCC 107 and in the case of Inder Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated

ABDULWAHID ABDULKARIM QURESHI,AHMEDNAGAR vs. ITO, WARD 2,, AHMEDNAGAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 893/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Sanket M. JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 147Section 250

condone the delay of 50 days in filing the appeal and admit the appeals for adjudication in light of judgments of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag & Anr. Vs. Mst. Katiji & Ors. reported in (1987) 2 SCC 107 and in the case of Inder Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated

DEEPAK VASANT MARANE,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 6(3), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, The appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2081/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं / Ita No.2081/Pun/2025 निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Year: 2020-21 Deepak Vasant Marane, Ito, Ward-6(3), Pune Plot No. 84 Ganpati Nagar, Taloda Road, Nandurbar-425412 Vs. Maharashtra Pan-Ahjpm4976D अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Sandeep Lodha (throughFor Respondent: Shri
Section 147Section 148Section 148BSection 151Section 250Section 69Section 69A

148B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 5. On the facts and circumstances of the Appellant's case and in law the Id. CIT(A) erred in confirming the action of Id. AO in making an addition of Rs. 31,07,580/- by invoking provisions of Sec. 69A of the Income Tax Act 1961 being the cash deposits in bank