KARMANYE VADHIKARASTE FOUNDATION,PUNE vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose
ITA 1717/PUN/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Nov 2025AY 2023-24
Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1717/Pun/2025 Karmanye Vadhikaraste Vs. Cit, Exemption, Pune. Foundation, Ground Floor, A2-G02, S.No.64, Geras Greens, Villa Soc., Behind Eon It Park, Pune- 411014. Pan : Aaick9637J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Saurabh Jitendra Patil Revenue By : Shri Amol Khairnar Date Of Hearing : 12.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 14.11.2025 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 22.09.2023 Passed By Ld. Cit, Exemption, Pune Rejecting The Application For Registration U/S 12Ab Of The It Act. 2. There Is Delay In Filing Of The Present Appeal. We Are Satisfied With The Reasons Mentioned In The Affidavit For Condonation That The Applicant Was Prevented By Sufficient Cause For Not Filing The Appeal
For Appellant: Shri Saurabh Jitendra PatilFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)
condone the delay and proceed to adjudicate the appeal.
3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a trust applied for registration in Form 10AB u/s 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Act on 15.03.2023. Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune found that the application was furnished u/s 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Act instead
