Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 11Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai14 Delhi6 Kolkata4 Chennai4 SC4 Nagpur4 Lucknow3 Bangalore3 Chandigarh2 Pune2 VIKRAMAJIT SEN SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1 Hyderabad1 Jabalpur1 Karnataka1 Patna1 Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4 Section 194C4 Deduction2

M/S. ORGANICA,NASHIK vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK -1, NASHIK

In the result, Assessee’s appeal

ITA 465/PUN/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Dec 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri G.D. Padmashali

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Kumar

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 263Section 80I

11A) deduction. 4. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the vehement rival stands and find no merit in the Revenue’s stand supporting the PCIT’s impugned revision directions. This is for the precise reason that the Assessing Officer had taken-up a “limited” scrutiny on the twin issues of sundry creditors and depreciation deduction, which in turn

M/S. ORGANICA,NASHIK vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK -1, NASHIK

M/S. ORGANICA,NASHIK vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK -1, NASHIK

SUYOJIT BOITECH,NASHIK vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE -2, NASHIK