Search: condonation of delay

85 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 117clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 12A47 Section 10(20)24 Section 1124 Section 143(3)21 Section 12A(1)(ac)16 Section 26313 Addition to Income11 Section 14710 Exemption

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 544/PUN/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda

Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

condone the delay for accepting the auditor’s report at a later date has only been given to the ITO and not thereafter, i.e., at the appellate stage. We find no merit in this submission. The CBDT by issuing the Circular dt. 9th Feb., 1978 has treated the provision regarding furnishing of auditor’s report along with the return

Showing 1–20 of 85 · Page 1 of 5

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

KALIAPERUMAL SELVARAJ,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), PUNE, PUNE

ARJUN BHAIRU BHANGIRE,PUNE vs. ITO WARD 14,, PUNE

ABHIMAYU ARJUN BHANGIRE,PUNE vs. ITO 14(1), PUNE

ABHIMAYU ARJUN BHANGIRE,PUNE vs. ITO 14(1), PUNE

SHREE AYAPPA SEVA SAMAJAM TRUST,NASHIK vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE, PUNE

SKYLINE DEVELOPERS,PUNE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD4(50, PUNE

SHRI MURLI MANOHAR NAGARI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA MARYADIT,MAHAD vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, PANVEL

SHRI SWAMIRAJ BAHUUDDESHIY SANSTHA,DHULE vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD

SHRI SWAMIRAJ BAHUUDDESHIY SANSTHA,DHULE vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD

SHRI CHH SAHU SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,KOLHAPUR vs. DCIT, KOLHAPUR

SHRI VITHAL SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,SOLAPUR vs. DCIT, SOLAPUR

VITHAL RAO SHINDE SSK LTD,SOLAPUR vs. ACIT, SOLAPUR

SHRI DUDHGANGA VEDGANGA SAH: SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,KOLHAPUR vs. ACIT, KOLHAPUR

DY.CIT, CIR.-3(1), DHULE, DHULE vs. SHIRPUR SHETKARI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD.,, DAHIWAD