BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

259 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 02clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai427Chennai381Kolkata379Delhi274Pune259Ahmedabad208Bangalore189Hyderabad174Jaipur151Visakhapatnam80Lucknow78Surat67Chandigarh63Amritsar60Indore52Cuttack44Raipur41Rajkot34Panaji33Nagpur25Patna24Cochin17Allahabad16Guwahati16Agra9Telangana8Jodhpur6SC6Varanasi5Jabalpur4Karnataka4Calcutta3Orissa2Dehradun2Ranchi2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 234E59Section 200A54Addition to Income53Section 14737Section 14837Section 25035Deduction29Penalty28Section 143(3)27

INCOME TAX OFFICER, BODHI TOWER vs. KUMAR BUILDERS PROJECT PUNE PRIVATE LIMITED, BUND GARDEN

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 199/PUN/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune11 Jun 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil S PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 80ISection 80P

Section 139(3) of the Income Tax Act, it cannot be stated that the delay in filing the return had occurred deliberately or on account of culpable negligence or on account of mala-fides. Further, the petitioner does not stand to benefit by resorting to delay. In fact, they run a serious risk. Moreover, when the petitioner had satisfactorily explained

Showing 1–20 of 259 · Page 1 of 13

...
TDS27
Section 143(1)26
Condonation of Delay25

PRAVIN BABANRAO TAMBE,PUNE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as not maintainable

ITA 692/PUN/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune11 Mar 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.692/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Pravin Babanrao Tambe, Vs. Pcit, Pune-4. Sr. No.14, Shree Datta Colony, Akashwani, Hadapsar, Pune- 411028. Pan : Aimpt5087G Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Smt. Deepa Khare Revenue By : Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari Date Of Hearing : 12.12.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 11.03.2025 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 31.03.2021 Passed By Ld. Pr.Cit, Pune- 4 [‘Ld. Pcit’] U/S 263 Of The It Act For The Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. The Appellant Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1. Ld Cit Erred In Law & On Facts In Invoking Jurisdiction Under Section 263 & Setting Aside Assessment Order For Fresh Assessment On The Ground That Assessment Has Been Framed

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa KhareFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 263Section 48

02,88,286/- towards expenses paid to one Mr. Shevale for acquiring access for entry into the land. Expenses incurred for acquiring access outside the land sold cannot be considered as expenses incurred for the purpose of claiming deduction u/s 48. According to him, the genuineness of the payment of expenses incurred by the assessee is also not verified

SOPAN GAHINAJI LANKE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1218/PUN/2019[2014-15 (26Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Apr 2022
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.G Jasnani (through physical)
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

section should not be levied. However, none appeared. The A.O therefore, found default in filing the returns without sufficient cause and hence referring to the provisions of sec. 272A(2)(k) of the Act has levied penalty of Rs. 56,800/- for delay of 568 days @ Rs. 100/- per day for first quarter and Rs. 47,600/- for delay

SOPAN GAHINAJI LANKE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1215/PUN/2019[2013-14 (24Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Apr 2022
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.G Jasnani (through physical)
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

section should not be levied. However, none appeared. The A.O therefore, found default in filing the returns without sufficient cause and hence referring to the provisions of sec. 272A(2)(k) of the Act has levied penalty of Rs. 56,800/- for delay of 568 days @ Rs. 100/- per day for first quarter and Rs. 47,600/- for delay

SOPAN GAHINAJI LANKE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1233/PUN/2019[2016-17 (26Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Apr 2022
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.G Jasnani (through physical)
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

section should not be levied. However, none appeared. The A.O therefore, found default in filing the returns without sufficient cause and hence referring to the provisions of sec. 272A(2)(k) of the Act has levied penalty of Rs. 56,800/- for delay of 568 days @ Rs. 100/- per day for first quarter and Rs. 47,600/- for delay

SOPAN GAHINAJI LANKE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1220/PUN/2019[2014-15 (26Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Apr 2022
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.G Jasnani (through physical)
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

section should not be levied. However, none appeared. The A.O therefore, found default in filing the returns without sufficient cause and hence referring to the provisions of sec. 272A(2)(k) of the Act has levied penalty of Rs. 56,800/- for delay of 568 days @ Rs. 100/- per day for first quarter and Rs. 47,600/- for delay

SOPAN GAHINAJI LANKE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1222/PUN/2019[2015-16 (24Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Apr 2022
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.G Jasnani (through physical)
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

section should not be levied. However, none appeared. The A.O therefore, found default in filing the returns without sufficient cause and hence referring to the provisions of sec. 272A(2)(k) of the Act has levied penalty of Rs. 56,800/- for delay of 568 days @ Rs. 100/- per day for first quarter and Rs. 47,600/- for delay

SOPAN GAHINAJI LANKE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1231/PUN/2019[2016-17 (26Q-Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Apr 2022
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.G Jasnani (through physical)
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

section should not be levied. However, none appeared. The A.O therefore, found default in filing the returns without sufficient cause and hence referring to the provisions of sec. 272A(2)(k) of the Act has levied penalty of Rs. 56,800/- for delay of 568 days @ Rs. 100/- per day for first quarter and Rs. 47,600/- for delay

SOPAN GAHINAJI LANKE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1228/PUN/2019[2015-16 (26Q-Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Apr 2022
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.G Jasnani (through physical)
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

section should not be levied. However, none appeared. The A.O therefore, found default in filing the returns without sufficient cause and hence referring to the provisions of sec. 272A(2)(k) of the Act has levied penalty of Rs. 56,800/- for delay of 568 days @ Rs. 100/- per day for first quarter and Rs. 47,600/- for delay

SOPAN GAHINAJI LANKE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1216/PUN/2019[2014-15 (24Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Apr 2022
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.G Jasnani (through physical)
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

section should not be levied. However, none appeared. The A.O therefore, found default in filing the returns without sufficient cause and hence referring to the provisions of sec. 272A(2)(k) of the Act has levied penalty of Rs. 56,800/- for delay of 568 days @ Rs. 100/- per day for first quarter and Rs. 47,600/- for delay

SOPAN GAHINAJI LANKE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1229/PUN/2019[2015-16 (26Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Apr 2022
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.G Jasnani (through physical)
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

section should not be levied. However, none appeared. The A.O therefore, found default in filing the returns without sufficient cause and hence referring to the provisions of sec. 272A(2)(k) of the Act has levied penalty of Rs. 56,800/- for delay of 568 days @ Rs. 100/- per day for first quarter and Rs. 47,600/- for delay

SOPAN GAHINAJI LANKE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1223/PUN/2019[2015-16 (24Q-Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Apr 2022
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.G Jasnani (through physical)
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

section should not be levied. However, none appeared. The A.O therefore, found default in filing the returns without sufficient cause and hence referring to the provisions of sec. 272A(2)(k) of the Act has levied penalty of Rs. 56,800/- for delay of 568 days @ Rs. 100/- per day for first quarter and Rs. 47,600/- for delay

SOPAN GAHINAJI LANKE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1221/PUN/2019[2015-16 (24Q-Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Apr 2022
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.G Jasnani (through physical)
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

section should not be levied. However, none appeared. The A.O therefore, found default in filing the returns without sufficient cause and hence referring to the provisions of sec. 272A(2)(k) of the Act has levied penalty of Rs. 56,800/- for delay of 568 days @ Rs. 100/- per day for first quarter and Rs. 47,600/- for delay

SOPAN GAHINAJI LANKE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1214/PUN/2019[2011-12 (26Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Apr 2022
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.G Jasnani (through physical)
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

section should not be levied. However, none appeared. The A.O therefore, found default in filing the returns without sufficient cause and hence referring to the provisions of sec. 272A(2)(k) of the Act has levied penalty of Rs. 56,800/- for delay of 568 days @ Rs. 100/- per day for first quarter and Rs. 47,600/- for delay

SOPAN GAHINAJI LANKE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1224/PUN/2019[2015-16 (24Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Apr 2022
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.G Jasnani (through physical)
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

section should not be levied. However, none appeared. The A.O therefore, found default in filing the returns without sufficient cause and hence referring to the provisions of sec. 272A(2)(k) of the Act has levied penalty of Rs. 56,800/- for delay of 568 days @ Rs. 100/- per day for first quarter and Rs. 47,600/- for delay

SOPAN GAHINAJI LANKE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1219/PUN/2019[2014-15 (26Q-Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Apr 2022
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.G Jasnani (through physical)
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

section should not be levied. However, none appeared. The A.O therefore, found default in filing the returns without sufficient cause and hence referring to the provisions of sec. 272A(2)(k) of the Act has levied penalty of Rs. 56,800/- for delay of 568 days @ Rs. 100/- per day for first quarter and Rs. 47,600/- for delay

SOPAN GAHINAJI LANKE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1217/PUN/2019[2014-15 (26Q-Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Apr 2022
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.G Jasnani (through physical)
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

section should not be levied. However, none appeared. The A.O therefore, found default in filing the returns without sufficient cause and hence referring to the provisions of sec. 272A(2)(k) of the Act has levied penalty of Rs. 56,800/- for delay of 568 days @ Rs. 100/- per day for first quarter and Rs. 47,600/- for delay

SOPAN GAHINAJI LANKE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1225/PUN/2019[2015-16 (26Q-Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Apr 2022
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.G Jasnani (through physical)
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

section should not be levied. However, none appeared. The A.O therefore, found default in filing the returns without sufficient cause and hence referring to the provisions of sec. 272A(2)(k) of the Act has levied penalty of Rs. 56,800/- for delay of 568 days @ Rs. 100/- per day for first quarter and Rs. 47,600/- for delay

SOPAN GAHINAJI LANKE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1230/PUN/2019[2016-17 (24Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Apr 2022
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.G Jasnani (through physical)
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

section should not be levied. However, none appeared. The A.O therefore, found default in filing the returns without sufficient cause and hence referring to the provisions of sec. 272A(2)(k) of the Act has levied penalty of Rs. 56,800/- for delay of 568 days @ Rs. 100/- per day for first quarter and Rs. 47,600/- for delay

SOPAN GAHINAJI LANKE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

The appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1232/PUN/2019[2016-17 (26Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Apr 2022
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.G Jasnani (through physical)
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

section should not be levied. However, none appeared. The A.O therefore, found default in filing the returns without sufficient cause and hence referring to the provisions of sec. 272A(2)(k) of the Act has levied penalty of Rs. 56,800/- for delay of 568 days @ Rs. 100/- per day for first quarter and Rs. 47,600/- for delay