SOMNATH RAMDAS JADHAV,AHMEDNAGAR vs. ITO, WARD 2, AHMEDNAGAR, AHMEDNAGAR

Accordingly, the appeal in ITA No.1092/PUN/2025 for A.Y. 2013-14 involving the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is allowed

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

seizure action at third party & hence, consequential proceedings pertaining to search & requisition ought to have been issued u/s 153C rather than 147 of the ITA, 1961. Place: Ahmednagar Date:11/11/2024 Somnath Ramdas Jadhav 5. The appellant, in addition to filing Additional Grounds, also requested to grant further adjournment. However, this cannot be accepted on the fact that the AO issued

SOMNATH RAMDAS JADHAV,AHMEDNAGAR vs. ITO WARD 2, AHMEDNAGAR

Accordingly, the appeal in ITA No.1092/PUN/2025 for A.Y. 2013-14 involving the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is allowed

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

seizure action at third party & hence, consequential proceedings pertaining to search & requisition ought to have been issued u/s 153C rather than 147 of the ITA, 1961. Place: Ahmednagar Date:11/11/2024 Somnath Ramdas Jadhav 5. The appellant, in addition to filing Additional Grounds, also requested to grant further adjournment. However, this cannot be accepted on the fact that the AO issued

SOMNATH RAMDAS JADHAV,AHMEDNAGAR vs. ITO WARD2, AHMEDNAGAR

Accordingly, the appeal in ITA No.1092/PUN/2025 for A.Y. 2013-14 involving the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is allowed

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

seizure action at third party & hence, consequential proceedings pertaining to search & requisition ought to have been issued u/s 153C rather than 147 of the ITA, 1961. Place: Ahmednagar Date:11/11/2024 Somnath Ramdas Jadhav 5. The appellant, in addition to filing Additional Grounds, also requested to grant further adjournment. However, this cannot be accepted on the fact that the AO issued

SOMNATH RAMDAS JADHAV,AHMEDNAGAR vs. ITO, WARD 2, AHMEDNAGAR, AHMEDNAGAR

Accordingly, the appeal in ITA No.1092/PUN/2025 for A.Y. 2013-14 involving the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is allowed

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

seizure action at third party & hence, consequential proceedings pertaining to search & requisition ought to have been issued u/s 153C rather than 147 of the ITA, 1961. Place: Ahmednagar Date:11/11/2024 Somnath Ramdas Jadhav 5. The appellant, in addition to filing Additional Grounds, also requested to grant further adjournment. However, this cannot be accepted on the fact that the AO issued

SOMNATH RAMDAS JADHAV,AHMEDNAGAR vs. ITO WARD 2, AHMEDNAGAR, AHMEDNAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA\nNo

search & Seizure\naction u/s 132 of the IT Act, 1961 carried out in case of the M/s.\nShri Renuka Mate Multi State Urban Co-operative Credit Society\nLtd. (in short Society/SRMSCS) on 26.05.2017, it was found that\nthe huge money was deposited in the bank accounts maintained\nin the society and during the course of assessment proceedings\nthe society could

SOMNATH RAMDAS JADHAV,AHMEDNAGAR vs. ITO WARD 2, AHMEDNAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA\nNo

search & Seizure\naction u/s 132 of the IT Act, 1961 carried out in case of the M/s.\nShri Renuka Mate Multi State Urban Co-operative Credit Society\nLtd. (in short Society/SRMSCS) on 26.05.2017, it was found that\nthe huge money was deposited in the bank accounts maintained\nin the society and during the course of assessment proceedings\nthe society could

SOPAN DHONDIBA TUPE,PUNE vs. DCIT, CIR 2(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1196/Pun/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2006-07

seizure action u/s.132A of the Act was conducted in Tupe Group on 13.02.2009 wherein the assessee was covered. During the course of search, certain incriminating material in the form of note books, diaries and loose papers were seized which revealed land transactions of the Tupe family and distribution of money among the family members. Consequent to search, the case

BALU VITHAL PAWALE,PUNE vs. ITO WD- 2(4), PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Ms.Astha Chandra & Dr.Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No.2869/Pun/2025 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Balu Vithal Pawale, V Assessing Officer, Village-Kasarsai, S National Faceless Taluka-Mulsi, Assessment Centre, Dist-Pune – 410506. Delhi Pan:Bfcpp7170L Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri B.S.Rajpurohit Revenue By Shri Madhukar Anand-Jcit(Through Virtual) Date Of Hearing 08/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement 14/01/2026 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeal)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For The A.Y.2017-18 Dated 16.10.2024 Emanating From The Assessment Order Passed Under Section 147R.W.S 144 Read With Section 144B Of The Act, Dated 27.03.2022. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :

condoned. Findings & Analysis : 3. We have heard both the parties and perused the records. In this case, ld.CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee as assessee failed to file any reply to notices issued by ld.CIT(A). Ld.CIT(A) has not adjudicated the grounds raised by the 2 ITA No.2869/PUN/2025 [A] Assessee.Ld.AR submitted that one more opportunity

SHRI MANOJ MADANLAL CHHAJED,PUNE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), PUNE

seizure\naction carried out in the premises of Shri Naresh Jain, it was stated that\ninformation showed that Petitioner had traded in the shares of M/s. Scan Steels\nLtd., and was in receipt of Rs.23,98,014.00 and therefore, Respondent No. 2\nconcluded that he had reasons to believe that this amount had escaped assessment\nwithin the meaning of section

MANOJ MADANLAL CHHAJED,PUNE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), PUNE

seizure\naction carried out in the premises of Shri Naresh Jain, it was stated that\ninformation showed that Petitioner had traded in the shares of M/s. Scan Steels\nLtd., and was in receipt of Rs.23,98,014.00 and therefore, Respondent No. 2\nconcluded that he had reasons to believe that this amount had escaped assessment\nwithin the meaning of section

SAJID DASTAGIR SAYYED,LATUR vs. WARD 1 LATUR, LATUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

condone the delay and proceed to decide the appeal. 3. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:- “1. The order of the learned CIT(A) confirming the addition of Rs.1,08,70,530/- U/s 69A of I.T. Act. made by the A.O. is erroneous as CIT(A) has not considered any grounds of appeal made by appellant

ARUNDHATI DNYANDEO KALANE,AHILYANAGAR vs. ITO, WARD-1, AHILYANAGAR, AHILYANAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed as per the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.623/Pun/2025 Assessment Year : 2013-14

condone the delay of 363 days in filing of the instant appeal before this Tribunal and admit the appeal for adjudication. 4. Assessee has raised four grounds of appeal of which Ground No.4 is general in nature which needs no adjudication. Ground No.1 has been raised challenging the jurisdiction assumed by the ld. Assessing Officer for carrying the re- assessment

PRIYANVADA AMOL MAHAJAN,JALGAON vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

seizure action u/s 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was conducted on the doctors group at Nashik, Dhule and Jalgaon on 20/02/2019 and the assessees above-mentioned were covered in the said action. All the above assessments were completed by the AO u/s 143(3) r.w.s 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by obtaining approval u/s 153D

AMOL PRAMOD MAHAJAN,JALGAON vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

seizure action u/s 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was conducted on the doctors group at Nashik, Dhule and Jalgaon on 20/02/2019 and the assessees above-mentioned were covered in the said action. All the above assessments were completed by the AO u/s 143(3) r.w.s 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by obtaining approval u/s 153D

AMOL PRAMOD MAHAJAN,JALGAON vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

seizure action u/s 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was conducted on the doctors group at Nashik, Dhule and Jalgaon on 20/02/2019 and the assessees above-mentioned were covered in the said action. All the above assessments were completed by the AO u/s 143(3) r.w.s 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by obtaining approval u/s 153D

PRIYANVADA AMOL MAHAJAN,JALGAON vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

seizure action u/s 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was conducted on the doctors group at Nashik, Dhule and Jalgaon on 20/02/2019 and the assessees above-mentioned were covered in the said action. All the above assessments were completed by the AO u/s 143(3) r.w.s 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by obtaining approval u/s 153D

AMOL PRAMOD MAHAJAN,JALGAON vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

seizure action u/s 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was conducted on the doctors group at Nashik, Dhule and Jalgaon on 20/02/2019 and the assessees above-mentioned were covered in the said action. All the above assessments were completed by the AO u/s 143(3) r.w.s 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by obtaining approval u/s 153D

AMOL PRAMOD MAHAJAN,JALGAON vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

seizure action u/s 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was conducted on the doctors group at Nashik, Dhule and Jalgaon on 20/02/2019 and the assessees above-mentioned were covered in the said action. All the above assessments were completed by the AO u/s 143(3) r.w.s 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by obtaining approval u/s 153D