DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. SHIKSHANA PRASARAKA MANDALI,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Charitable Trust Act and is running 61 educational institutions. The assessee runs reputed educational institutions one amongst them is L N Welingkar Institute of Management Development and Research. A search was conducted on 20- 11-2010 in the case of Dr. Uday Salunkhe, Director of L N Welingkar Institute of Management Development and Research. During search certain documents/loose papers belonging

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. SHIKSHANA PRASARAKA MANDALI,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Charitable Trust Act and is running 61 educational institutions. The assessee runs reputed educational institutions one amongst them is L N Welingkar Institute of Management Development and Research. A search was conducted on 20- 11-2010 in the case of Dr. Uday Salunkhe, Director of L N Welingkar Institute of Management Development and Research. During search certain documents/loose papers belonging

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. SHIKSHANA PRASARAKA MANDALI,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Charitable Trust Act and is running 61 educational institutions. The assessee runs reputed educational institutions one amongst them is L N Welingkar Institute of Management Development and Research. A search was conducted on 20- 11-2010 in the case of Dr. Uday Salunkhe, Director of L N Welingkar Institute of Management Development and Research. During search certain documents/loose papers belonging

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. SHIKSHANA PRASARAKA MANDALI,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Charitable Trust Act and is running 61 educational institutions. The assessee runs reputed educational institutions one amongst them is L N Welingkar Institute of Management Development and Research. A search was conducted on 20- 11-2010 in the case of Dr. Uday Salunkhe, Director of L N Welingkar Institute of Management Development and Research. During search certain documents/loose papers belonging

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. SHIKSHANA PRASARAKA MANDALI,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Charitable Trust Act and is running 61 educational institutions. The assessee runs reputed educational institutions one amongst them is L N Welingkar Institute of Management Development and Research. A search was conducted on 20- 11-2010 in the case of Dr. Uday Salunkhe, Director of L N Welingkar Institute of Management Development and Research. During search certain documents/loose papers belonging

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. SHIKSHANA PRASARAKA MANDALI,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Charitable Trust Act and is running 61 educational institutions. The assessee runs reputed educational institutions one amongst them is L N Welingkar Institute of Management Development and Research. A search was conducted on 20- 11-2010 in the case of Dr. Uday Salunkhe, Director of L N Welingkar Institute of Management Development and Research. During search certain documents/loose papers belonging

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. SHIKSHANA PRASARAKA MANDALI,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Charitable Trust Act and is running 61 educational institutions. The assessee runs reputed educational institutions one amongst them is L N Welingkar Institute of Management Development and Research. A search was conducted on 20- 11-2010 in the case of Dr. Uday Salunkhe, Director of L N Welingkar Institute of Management Development and Research. During search certain documents/loose papers belonging

NINAIDEVI SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL,,SANGLI vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION), WARD,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

charitable trust registered u/s. 12A of the I. T. Act, 1961 by the Commissioner of Income Tax and it has been carrying out the educational activities by running educational institutes in most rural areas in the District of Sangli and the donations were given by a number of well-wishers of the appellant residing in the rural areas

CHITRA NARENDRA PARMAR ,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

undisclosed income. Therefore, the addition made by the AO of Rs.25,00,000/- for AY 2016-17 and Rs.20,00,000/- for AY 2017-18 are upheld and the ground no.1 of appeal taken by the appellant is dismissed. 4.2.6 Vide letter dated 10.02.2024, the appellant submitted that the Addl. CIT, Central has granted approval u/s 153D

RAMANLAL BHIKULAL SHAH,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

undisclosed income. Therefore, the addition made by the AO of Rs.25,00,000/- for AY 2016-17 and Rs.20,00,000/- for AY 2017-18 are upheld and the ground no.1 of appeal taken by the appellant is dismissed. 4.2.6 Vide letter dated 10.02.2024, the appellant submitted that the Addl. CIT, Central has granted approval u/s 153D

RAMLAL BHIKULAL SHAH,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

undisclosed income. Therefore, the addition made by the AO of Rs.25,00,000/- for AY 2016-17 and Rs.20,00,000/- for AY 2017-18 are upheld and the ground no.1 of appeal taken by the appellant is dismissed. 4.2.6 Vide letter dated 10.02.2024, the appellant submitted that the Addl. CIT, Central has granted approval u/s 153D

ASHOK BHARTI GOSWAMI,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

undisclosed income. Therefore, the addition made by the AO of Rs.25,00,000/- for AY 2016-17 and Rs.20,00,000/- for AY 2017-18 are upheld and the ground no.1 of appeal taken by the appellant is dismissed. 4.2.6 Vide letter dated 10.02.2024, the appellant submitted that the Addl. CIT, Central has granted approval u/s 153D

CHITRA NARENDRA PARMAR,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

undisclosed income. Therefore, the addition made by the AO of Rs.25,00,000/- for AY 2016-17 and Rs.20,00,000/- for AY 2017-18 are upheld and the ground no.1 of appeal taken by the appellant is dismissed. 4.2.6 Vide letter dated 10.02.2024, the appellant submitted that the Addl. CIT, Central has granted approval u/s 153D

ASHISH RAMESH OSWAL,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

undisclosed income. Therefore, the addition made by the AO of\nRs.25,00,000/- for AY 2016-17 and Rs.20,00,000/- for AY 2017-18 are upheld and\nthe ground no.1 of appeal taken by the appellant is dismissed.\n\n4.2.6 Vide letter dated 10.02.2024, the appellant submitted that the Addl. CIT,\nCentral has granted approval u/s 153D

DEEPAK KANTILAL JAIN,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

undisclosed income. Therefore, the addition made by the AO of\nRs.25,00,000/- for AY 2016-17 and Rs.20,00,000/- for AY 2017-18 are upheld and\nthe ground no.1 of appeal taken by the appellant is dismissed.\n4.2.6 Vide letter dated 10.02.2024, the appellant submitted that the Addl. CIT,\nCentral has granted approval u/s 153D

ASHISH RAMESH OSWAL,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

undisclosed income. Therefore, the addition made by the AO of\nRs.25,00,000/- for AY 2016-17 and Rs.20,00,000/- for AY 2017-18 are upheld and\nthe ground no.1 of appeal taken by the appellant is dismissed.\n4.2.6 Vide letter dated 10.02.2024, the appellant submitted that the Addl. CIT,\nCentral has granted approval u/s 153D

ASHOK BHARTI GOSWAMI ,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

undisclosed income. Therefore, the addition made by the AO of\nRs.25,00,000/- for AY 2016-17 and Rs.20,00,000/- for AY 2017-18 are upheld and\nthe ground no.1 of appeal taken by the appellant is dismissed.\n4.2.6 Vide letter dated 10.02.2024, the appellant submitted that the Addl. CIT,\nCentral has granted approval u/s 153D

ADISH SHANTILAL SOLANKI,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), PUNE, PUNE

undisclosed income. Therefore, the addition made by the AO of\nRs.25,00,000/- for AY 2016-17 and Rs.20,00,000/- for AY 2017-18 are upheld and\nthe ground no.1 of appeal taken by the appellant is dismissed.\n4.2.6 Vide letter dated 10.02.2024, the appellant submitted that the Addl. CIT,\nCentral has granted approval u/s 153D