SHRI MUKUND BHAVAN TRUST,PUNE vs. CIT(E), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrashri Mukund Bhavan Trust Cit (Exemption), Pune 1105, Raviwar Peth, Mukund Vs. Bhavan, Pune – 411002 Pan: Aaats5170R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri V.L. Jain Department By : Shri Mallikarjun Utture, Cit Date Of Hearing : 05-02-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 29-04-2025 O R D E R

37. We find the procedure for fresh registration (introduced w.e.f. 01.04.2021) for applications made under section 12A(1)(ac) is provided in section 12AB. We find sub-section 12AB(4), inter alia, provides for noticing of specific violations during any previous year. The Explanation thereunder defines specified violation which means, inter alia, under clause (f) - the trust or institution

POONA OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGICAL SOCIETY,PUNE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL, PUNE, PUNE

charitable\ntrust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950. It\nwas formed on 27.01.1977 and firstly it was granted registered\nunder the regulatory law on 30.09.1977 and thereafter\nregistration under the old regime was granted u/s.12A on\n04.12.1982. Main objects of POGS from its Memorandum of\nAssociation are to promote (i) professional Fellowship amongst the\nmembers; (ii) to encourage

AIDS SOCIETY OF INDIA,MUMBAI vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), PUNE

charitable or religious purposes, has been applied, other than for the objects of the trust or institution\n(f) the trust or institution has not complied with the requirement of any other law, as referred to in item (B) of sub-clause (i) of clause (b) of sub- section (1), and the order, direction or decree, by whatever name called

AGRA OBSTETRICAL AND GYNAECOLOGICAL SOCIETY,AGRA vs. PCIT, CENTRAL, PUNE

charitable or religious purposes, has been applied, other than\nfor the objects of the trust or institution\n(f) the trust or institution has not complied with the requirement of any\nother law, as referred to in item (B) of sub-clause (i) of clause (b) of sub-\nsection (1), and the order, direction or decree, by whatever name called

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

Trust Act, 1963. We have also gone through the various judicial decisions relied on by the assessee and are of the view that the issue raised in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by these decisions. Accordingly, we conclude that the activities carried on by the assessee are of charitable nature and come within the definition

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

Trust Act, 1963. We have also gone through the various judicial decisions relied on by the assessee and are of the view that the issue raised in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by these decisions. Accordingly, we conclude that the activities carried on by the assessee are of charitable nature and come within the definition

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

Trust Act, 1963. We have also gone through the various judicial decisions relied on by the assessee and are of the view that the issue raised in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by these decisions. Accordingly, we conclude that the activities carried on by the assessee are of charitable nature and come within the definition

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

Trust Act, 1963. We have also gone through the various judicial decisions relied on by the assessee and are of the view that the issue raised in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by these decisions. Accordingly, we conclude that the activities carried on by the assessee are of charitable nature and come within the definition

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

Trust Act, 1963. We have also gone through the various judicial decisions relied on by the assessee and are of the view that the issue raised in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by these decisions. Accordingly, we conclude that the activities carried on by the assessee are of charitable nature and come within the definition

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

Trust Act, 1963. We have also gone through the various judicial decisions relied on by the assessee and are of the view that the issue raised in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by these decisions. Accordingly, we conclude that the activities carried on by the assessee are of charitable nature and come within the definition

AUDYOGIK NIDHI VISHWAST SANSTHA POONA,PUNE vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE, PMT BUILDING

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraaudyogik Nidhi Vishwast Sanstha The Cit (Exemption), Poona Pune 366, Narayan Peth, Limaye Vs. Building, Laxmi Road, Pune – 411030 Pan: Aaata1619H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Nikhil S Pathak Department By : Shri Amol Khairnar Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 05-02-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 30-04-2025 O R D E R

charitable trust created in the year 1905 by the great freedom fighter late Shri Bal Gangadhar Tilak and other patriots. The main objective of the trust was to generate employment and to make India self sufficient and industrialized. At that time the trust was also named as Audyogik Nidhi alias Paisa Fund. The trustees had literally collected one paisa each

SWASTHIYOG PRATISHTHAN,,SANGLI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Raviआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.1296/Pun/2019 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2015-16 Swasthiyog Pratishthan, Vs. Dcit (Exemptions) C/O. Dr. Gs Kulkarni, Circle, Pune. Orthopedic Hospital, Extension Area, Miraj, Sangli- 416410. Pan : Aaats5400L Appellant Respondent

charitable institution created or established before the commencement of this Act, the provisions of sub- clause (ii) shall not apply to any use or application, whether directly or indirectly, of any part of such income or any property of the trust or institution for the benefit of any person referred to in sub-section (3) in so far as such

MAHARSHI KARVE STREE SHIKSHAN SAMSTHA vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,,

In the result, both the appeals of assessee and Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.1409/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2008-09 Maharshi Karve Stree Shikshan Samstha Karvenagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411052 …. Pan: Aaatm1969L Vs. The Income Tax Officer, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Ward 11(1), Pune

37,19,866/- for the objects of the trust, but, the amount of Rs.11,00,15,480/- shown under head transferred to reserve, actually debited in income and expenditure a/c has not been further claimed as expenditure in computation of income. In nutshell, the appellant has not claimed deduction of the said amount of Rs.11,00,15,480/- while computing

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. MAHARSHI KARVE STREE SHIKSHAN SANSTHA,,

In the result, both the appeals of assessee and Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.1409/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2008-09 Maharshi Karve Stree Shikshan Samstha Karvenagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411052 …. Pan: Aaatm1969L Vs. The Income Tax Officer, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Ward 11(1), Pune

37,19,866/- for the objects of the trust, but, the amount of Rs.11,00,15,480/- shown under head transferred to reserve, actually debited in income and expenditure a/c has not been further claimed as expenditure in computation of income. In nutshell, the appellant has not claimed deduction of the said amount of Rs.11,00,15,480/- while computing

DHARMBHASKAR RASHTRASANT SHRIPACHLEGAVKAR MAHARJ PRATISHTAN,PUNE vs. EXEMPTION WARD 1(2), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

37,083/-. The\nassessee challenged such assessment order(s) before the Ld. CIT(A) which\nwas confirmed and thereafter on further appeal to the ITAT, Pune, the\nmatter was remanded back the to the file of the Ld. AO with specific\ndirection to consider the fact of grant of registration to the assessee trust\nu/s 12AA of the Act, vide

DHARMBHASKAR RASHTRASANT SHRIPACHLEGAVKAR MAHARJ PRATISHTAN,PUNE vs. EXEMPTION WARD 1(2), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

37,083/-. The\nassessee challenged such assessment order(s) before the Ld. CIT(A) which\nwas confirmed and thereafter on further appeal to the ITAT, Pune, the\nmatter was remanded back the to the file of the Ld. AO with specific\ndirection to consider the fact of grant of registration to the assessee trust\nu/s 12AA of the Act, vide

BHANSILAL RAMNATH AGARWAL CHARITABLE TRUST vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita Nos.1147, 1133, 1134 & 1136/Pun/2016 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10 & 2011-12 वष"

Charitable organization on 16-06-1975 under Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. The main objects of the trust include imparting primary, secondary, higher, university technical education and also to reconstruct temples/hospitals/Dharmashalas etc. Assessee was granted registration u/s.12AA of the Act vide order dated 02-08-1976. Assessee has been consistently claiming exemption u/s.11 of the Act. 4. Assessee submitted that

BHANSILAL RAMNATH AGARWAL CHARITABLE TRUST vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita Nos.1147, 1133, 1134 & 1136/Pun/2016 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10 & 2011-12 वष"

Charitable organization on 16-06-1975 under Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. The main objects of the trust include imparting primary, secondary, higher, university technical education and also to reconstruct temples/hospitals/Dharmashalas etc. Assessee was granted registration u/s.12AA of the Act vide order dated 02-08-1976. Assessee has been consistently claiming exemption u/s.11 of the Act. 4. Assessee submitted that

BHANSILAL RAMNATH AGARWAL CHARITABLE TRUST vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita Nos.1147, 1133, 1134 & 1136/Pun/2016 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10 & 2011-12 वष"

Charitable organization on 16-06-1975 under Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. The main objects of the trust include imparting primary, secondary, higher, university technical education and also to reconstruct temples/hospitals/Dharmashalas etc. Assessee was granted registration u/s.12AA of the Act vide order dated 02-08-1976. Assessee has been consistently claiming exemption u/s.11 of the Act. 4. Assessee submitted that

CAPGEMINI TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INDIA LIMITED,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PUNE

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

37 clarifying that for the purposes of sub-section (1) of the said section, any expenditure incurred by an assessee on the activities relating to Corporate Social Responsibility referred to in section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 shall not be deemed to be an expenditure incurred by the assessee for the purposes of the business or profession. This amendment