GOLDEN CHARITABLE TRUST,SANGLI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.933/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :- Golden Charitable Trust, The Cit Exemption, 2349, Guruwar Peth, Miraj, V Pune. Maharashtra – 416410. S Pan: Aactg0998H Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Kishor B Phadke – Ar Revenue By Shri Keyur Patel – Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 24/01/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 12/04/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemption), Pune Under Section 12Ab Of The Income Tax Act, 1961, Passed On 30.06.2023.The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal : “1. Learned Cit (Exemption) Has Erred In Fact & In Law In Rejecting The Application For The Registration Of The Trust U/S. 12A(1) (Ac) Despite The Fact That Appellant Trust Is Engaged In Pursuing Purely Charitable Objects Such As Providing Medical & Educational Aid To Needy Beneficiaries & The Trust Activities Are Genuine & There Is No Contrary Finding To It. Thus The Rejection Order Is Patently Illegal & Golden Charitable Trust [A]

VIII of 1871) or the Indian Registration Act, 1877 (III of 1877) or this Act came or comes into force, namely:- (a) instruments of gift of immoveable property; (b) other non-testamentary instruments which purport or operate, create, declare, assign, limit or extinguish, whether in present or in future any right, title or interest, whether vested or contingent

SHETH CHIMANLAL GOVINDDAS MEMORIAL TRUST,PUNE vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

viii) of sub-section (1)\nof section 36;\n(ixa) deposits with or investment in any bonds issued by a public\ncompany formed and registered in India with the main object of\ncarrying on the business of providing long-term finance for urban\ninfrastructure in India.\nExplanation.—For the purposes of this clause,—\n(a) \"long-term finance\" means

RAJARSHI SHAHU SHIKSHAN SANSTHA INAM DHAMANI,SANGLI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the appellant is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

Charitable Trust reported in (2013) 35 taxmann.com 295 (Punjab & Haryana). 10. We have considered the rival contentions and perused the record placed before us and carefully gone through the decisions relied on by both the parties. The sole issue raised before us is that ld.PCIT erred in rejecting the application for grant of regular registration u/s.12A r.w.s 12AB

THE MUMBAI OBSTETRIC GYNAECOLOGICAL SOCIETY,LOW PAREL (W) vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), PUNE, PUNE

36-38 of Bundle No 05 have been\nreproduced in reference of the Assessing Officer. These documents\ncontain a list of the doctors who were nominated by Emcure Pharma and\nthe nominations were accepted by the assessee trust. Arrangements for\naccommodation of the nominated doctors are also found to be made.\nFrom the aforesaid factual background it is clear that

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2(2),, PUNE vs. M/S SINHGAD TECHNICAL EDUCATION SOCIETY (TRUST), PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl. It(Ss)A No./ Name Of Appellant Name Of Respondent Asst. No.

Charitable Institutions, 363 ITR 230. (E). As regards to the allegation of violation of provisions of section 13(1)(c) by providing rent free accommodation to Shri Maruti N. Navale, it is submitted that the said Shri Maruti N. Navale had not been paid any remuneration by the appellant society for the following services rendered by him :- “a. Complete administration

ASHWINI SAHAKARI RUNGNALAYA & RESEARCH CENTER,,SOLAPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (EXEMPTIONS),, PUNE

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 714/Pun/2018 Ashwini Sahakari Rugnalaya & Research Centre 7107/1, Plot No. 180, North Sadar Bazar, Solapur-413003. Pan: Aaaja0041K . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant

viii) the benefit of section 11(1) of the Act is available only to trust whereas, the assessee is a co-operative society and not a trust, hence, there is no binding legal obligation on the assessee society to apply its income for charitable purpose (x) the fees charged from patients cannot be characterised as voluntary contribution for the purpose

SONAL SANDEEP SATAV,PUNE vs. PCIT, PUNE-2, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Ms. Astha Chandra & Shree G.D. Padmahshali

36. In Malabar Industrial Co Ltd. (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the revision jurisdiction under section 263 of the IT Act cannot be Invoked to correct each and every type of mistake or error committed by the AG. It is only when an order is erroneous that the section will be attracted. An incorrect assumption