DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

trust. He submitted that in the present case, the Assessing Officer has returned a finding that the assessee has neither applied 85% of its income for charitable purpose nor exercised the option in writing for the accumulation of income as per the provisions of Section 11(2) of the Act. Further, the said finding and computation by the Assessing Officer

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

trust. He submitted that in the present case, the Assessing Officer has returned a finding that the assessee has neither applied 85% of its income for charitable purpose nor exercised the option in writing for the accumulation of income as per the provisions of Section 11(2) of the Act. Further, the said finding and computation by the Assessing Officer

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

trust. He submitted that in the present case, the Assessing Officer has returned a finding that the assessee has neither applied 85% of its income for charitable purpose nor exercised the option in writing for the accumulation of income as per the provisions of Section 11(2) of the Act. Further, the said finding and computation by the Assessing Officer

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

trust. He submitted that in the present case, the Assessing Officer has returned a finding that the assessee has neither applied 85% of its income for charitable purpose nor exercised the option in writing for the accumulation of income as per the provisions of Section 11(2) of the Act. Further, the said finding and computation by the Assessing Officer

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

trust. He submitted that in the present case, the Assessing Officer has returned a finding that the assessee has neither applied 85% of its income for charitable purpose nor exercised the option in writing for the accumulation of income as per the provisions of Section 11(2) of the Act. Further, the said finding and computation by the Assessing Officer

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

trust. He submitted that in the present case, the Assessing Officer has returned a finding that the assessee has neither applied 85% of its income for charitable purpose nor exercised the option in writing for the accumulation of income as per the provisions of Section 11(2) of the Act. Further, the said finding and computation by the Assessing Officer

SHRI SWAMI SAMARTH ADHYATMIK SANSHODHAN SANSTHA,AURANGABAD vs. CIT(E), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

31-10-2025 Pronouncement : आदेश / ORDER PER ASTHA CHANDRA, JM : The appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 16.11.2024 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune [“CIT(E)”] whereby he rejected the application of the assessee filed before him in Form No. 10AB under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section

NAVALMAL FIRODIA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL TRUST,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD 1(2), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: the learned CIT(A), the same has neither been taken note of or distinguished in any manner. Not following the binding Judicial precedent of the Jurisdictional ITAT Pune is gross impropriety in law. Ground No. 2: The Appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend or withdraw all or any of the Grounds of Appeal herein and to submit such statements, documents and papers as may be considered necessary either at or before the appeal hearing.”

31- 3-2013 cannot become deemed income of the assessee for the assessment year 2013-14. 3. That the learned CIT(A) has failed to take note of the AO assessment order u/s.143(3) of the Act, dated 26.12,2016 for the A Y 2014-15, Wherein the learned.A0 has concluded the assessment after considering the bonafide explanation offered

YASHWANTRAO CHAVAN MAHARASHTRA OPEN UNIVERSITY,NASHIK vs. EXEMPTION CIRCLE,A BAD, AURANGABAD

trust in financial year 2022-23. It was\nsubmitted that as per section 11(3) of the Act as stood at that time (at the time of\naccumulation i.e. as on 31.03.2017), accumulated amount of Rs.90,70,20,511/- was\nrequired to be utilized by 31.03.2022. In case the same is not utilized, then the\namount was taxable

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PUNE BRANCH,SHUKRAWAR PETH vs. DCIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE, PUNE, SWARGATE

In the result, all the 5 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

3. In appeal the Ld. Addl. / JCIT(A) upheld the action of the Assessing Officer by observing as under: “6. Decision 6.1 The present appeal has been filed by the appellant, Indian Medical Association, a public charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, bearing registration No. F-166 (Pune). The trust has been filing its income

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PUNE BRANCH,SHUKRAWAR PETH vs. DCIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE, PUNE, SWARGATE

In the result, all the 5 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

3. In appeal the Ld. Addl. / JCIT(A) upheld the action of the Assessing Officer by observing as under: “6. Decision 6.1 The present appeal has been filed by the appellant, Indian Medical Association, a public charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, bearing registration No. F-166 (Pune). The trust has been filing its income

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PUNE BRANCH,SHUKRAWAR PETH vs. DCIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE, PUNE, SWARGATE

In the result, all the 5 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

3. In appeal the Ld. Addl. / JCIT(A) upheld the action of the Assessing Officer by observing as under: “6. Decision 6.1 The present appeal has been filed by the appellant, Indian Medical Association, a public charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, bearing registration No. F-166 (Pune). The trust has been filing its income

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PUNE BRANCH,SHUKRAWAR PETH vs. DCIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE, PUNE, SWARGATE

In the result, all the 5 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

3. In appeal the Ld. Addl. / JCIT(A) upheld the action of the Assessing Officer by observing as under: “6. Decision 6.1 The present appeal has been filed by the appellant, Indian Medical Association, a public charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, bearing registration No. F-166 (Pune). The trust has been filing its income

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PUNE BRANCH,SHUKRAWAR PETH vs. DCIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE PUNE, SWARGATE

In the result, all the 5 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

3. In appeal the Ld. Addl. / JCIT(A) upheld the action of the Assessing Officer by observing as under: “6. Decision 6.1 The present appeal has been filed by the appellant, Indian Medical Association, a public charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, bearing registration No. F-166 (Pune). The trust has been filing its income

SHRI VASUPUJYA SWAMI MAHARAJ TEMPLE TRUST,PUNE vs. ITO (EXEMPTION) WARD 1(2), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad

charitable or religious purposes as aforesaid or ceases to be accumulated or set apart for application thereto, or (b) ceases to remain invested or deposited in any of the forms or modes specified in sub-section (5), or (c) is not utilised for the purpose for which it is so accumulated or set apart during the period referred

SHRI ISHWARLAL GULABCHAND VARDHAMANTAP AYAMBIL TRUST,PUNE vs. ITO WARD 7(1), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad

charitable or religious purposes as aforesaid or ceases to be accumulated or set apart for application thereto, or (b) ceases to remain invested or deposited in any of the forms or modes specified in sub-section (5), or (c) is not utilised for the purpose for which it is so accumulated or set apart during the period referred

DWARAKA CHARITABLE TRUST,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,,

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

section 13(3)(b) of the Act in the facts and circumstances of the case. 3. Brief facts of the case on hand are that, the assessee is a charitable Trust registered u/s. 12A of the Act and its main objective is to provide medical relief and facilities by running a hospital, Trust Deed dated 18-04- 1974 at Page

BRAHMAN SABHA KARVEER,KOLHAPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

31 after exhaustively referring to the earlier precedent, held that where the objects of a trust are both charitable and religious, the trust shall be eligible for registration u/s 12AA of the Act. The section only requires to be established that such charitable purpose is not for the benefit of a particular religious community or caste. That