BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 221clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka423Delhi165Mumbai34Ahmedabad34Jaipur25Lucknow21Chennai20Calcutta16Bangalore16Chandigarh14Rajkot10Hyderabad8Kolkata8Amritsar5Varanasi4Indore4Pune3Cuttack3Telangana3Rajasthan2Visakhapatnam1Andhra Pradesh1Jodhpur1Kerala1Raipur1SC1Surat1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 80G(5)16Section 80G10Section 12A9Section 103Exemption3Section 12A(1)(ac)2Section 253(1)(c)2

ASHWINI SAHAKARI RUNGNALAYA & RESEARCH CENTER,,SOLAPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (EXEMPTIONS),, PUNE

ITA 714/PUN/2018[N.A]Status: DisposedITAT Pune07 Mar 2024

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 714/Pun/2018 Ashwini Sahakari Rugnalaya & Research Centre 7107/1, Plot No. 180, North Sadar Bazar, Solapur-413003. Pan: Aaaja0041K . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Shingte [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Keyur Patel [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 10Section 10(23)Section 11Section 12ASection 22Section 253(1)(c)

Trust. (iii) the primary object of assessee society as can be seen from the first registered bye-laws (Pg-153-to-193/PB-1) is running a business of hospital, schools, dispensaries & hostels etc., and there is hardly any whisper or provision relating to object of medical relief/charity (iv) the principal object of the assessee as laid in clause

SANSTHANAM ABHAY DAANAM,NANDURBAR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 949/PUN/2023[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: DisposedITAT Pune24 Jul 2024

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri P.S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Kumar Keshari
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

221 TTJ 0251 (Pune) (copy at pages 77-124 of the paper book) accompanied the said reply. But nothing was considered by the Ld. CIT(E) in his impugned order. 11. On the facts and in the circumstances of the assessee’s case, we are of the opinion that the matter deserves to be set aside and restored back

SANSTHANAM ABHAY DAANAM,NANDURBAR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 950/PUN/2023[Not Applicable]Status: DisposedITAT Pune24 Jul 2024

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri P.S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Kumar Keshari
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

221 TTJ 0251 (Pune) (copy at pages 77-124 of the paper book) accompanied the said reply. But nothing was considered by the Ld. CIT(E) in his impugned order. 11. On the facts and in the circumstances of the assessee’s case, we are of the opinion that the matter deserves to be set aside and restored back