BHANSILAL RAMNATH AGARWAL CHARITABLE TRUST vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita Nos.1147, 1133, 1134 & 1136/Pun/2016 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10 & 2011-12 वष"

charitable and therefore, the claim of exemption u/s.11 of the Act are to be decided against the assessee. or carrying out of the same in accordance with objects of the Trust are concerned, we find, the Revenue did not make out any case for denying the said exemption, in principle. In effect, there is no damage to the objects

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. SINHAGAD TECHNICAL EDUCATION SOCIETY,, PUNE

Accordingly, additional ground No.3 by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 2075 To 2077 & 2110/Pun/2014 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2007-08 To 2009-10 Sinhgad Technical Education Society, S. No. 44/1, Vadgaon ( Budruk), Off. Sinhagad Road, Pune-411 041. Pan : Aabts9900Q. …....अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

charitable trust ensures or is used or applied for the benefit of a person specified under section 13(3), the entire income of the trust is denied exemption. Considering the legal position emerging from the clear language of the statute as well as the case laws referred to, this contention of the appellant is also hereby rejected

SINHGAD TECHNICAL EDUCATION SOCIETY,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

Accordingly, additional ground No.3 by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 2075 To 2077 & 2110/Pun/2014 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2007-08 To 2009-10 Sinhgad Technical Education Society, S. No. 44/1, Vadgaon ( Budruk), Off. Sinhagad Road, Pune-411 041. Pan : Aabts9900Q. …....अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

charitable trust ensures or is used or applied for the benefit of a person specified under section 13(3), the entire income of the trust is denied exemption. Considering the legal position emerging from the clear language of the statute as well as the case laws referred to, this contention of the appellant is also hereby rejected

SINHGAD TECHNICAL EDUCATION SOCIETY,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

Accordingly, additional ground No.3 by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 2075 To 2077 & 2110/Pun/2014 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2007-08 To 2009-10 Sinhgad Technical Education Society, S. No. 44/1, Vadgaon ( Budruk), Off. Sinhagad Road, Pune-411 041. Pan : Aabts9900Q. …....अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

charitable trust ensures or is used or applied for the benefit of a person specified under section 13(3), the entire income of the trust is denied exemption. Considering the legal position emerging from the clear language of the statute as well as the case laws referred to, this contention of the appellant is also hereby rejected

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. SINHAGAD TECHNICAL EDUCATION SOCIETY,, PUNE

Accordingly, additional ground No.3 by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 2075 To 2077 & 2110/Pun/2014 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2007-08 To 2009-10 Sinhgad Technical Education Society, S. No. 44/1, Vadgaon ( Budruk), Off. Sinhagad Road, Pune-411 041. Pan : Aabts9900Q. …....अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

charitable trust ensures or is used or applied for the benefit of a person specified under section 13(3), the entire income of the trust is denied exemption. Considering the legal position emerging from the clear language of the statute as well as the case laws referred to, this contention of the appellant is also hereby rejected

SINHGAD TECHNICAL EDUCATION SOCIETY,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

Accordingly, additional ground No.3 by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 2075 To 2077 & 2110/Pun/2014 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2007-08 To 2009-10 Sinhgad Technical Education Society, S. No. 44/1, Vadgaon ( Budruk), Off. Sinhagad Road, Pune-411 041. Pan : Aabts9900Q. …....अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

charitable trust ensures or is used or applied for the benefit of a person specified under section 13(3), the entire income of the trust is denied exemption. Considering the legal position emerging from the clear language of the statute as well as the case laws referred to, this contention of the appellant is also hereby rejected

SINHGAD TECHNICAL EDUCATION SOCIETY,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

Accordingly, additional ground No.3 by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos. 2075 To 2077 & 2110/Pun/2014 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2007-08 To 2009-10 Sinhgad Technical Education Society, S. No. 44/1, Vadgaon ( Budruk), Off. Sinhagad Road, Pune-411 041. Pan : Aabts9900Q. …....अपीलाथ" / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

charitable trust ensures or is used or applied for the benefit of a person specified under section 13(3), the entire income of the trust is denied exemption. Considering the legal position emerging from the clear language of the statute as well as the case laws referred to, this contention of the appellant is also hereby rejected

ADISH SHANTILAL SOLANKI,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), PUNE, PUNE

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021) 277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon'ble High Court in the said decision has held that when application under section 245C made by trust is allowed to be proceeded with Settlement Commission (ITSC), then ITSC alone would have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as provided

ASHISH RAMESH OSWAL,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021) 277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon'ble High Court in the said decision has held that when application under section 245C made by trust is allowed to be proceeded with Settlement Commission (ITSC), then ITSC alone would have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as provided

DEEPAK KANTILAL JAIN ,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

The appeal stands dismissed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021) 277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon'ble High Court in the said decision has held that when application under section 245C made by trust is allowed to be proceeded with Settlement Commission (ITSC), then ITSC alone would have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as provided

DEEPAK KANTILAL JAIN,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

The appeal stands dismissed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021) 277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon'ble High Court in the said decision has held that when application under section 245C made by trust is allowed to be proceeded with Settlement Commission (ITSC), then ITSC alone would have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as provided

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT.LTD,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC,GAZIABAD, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

220(2) of the Act of Rs 29,675/- which may please be deleted. C. OTHER GROUNDS: 5. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, alter, revise, substitute, or withdraw any or all grounds of the 6 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 appeal at the time of hearing of the appeal, if deemed necessary, in the interest of justice

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

220(2) of the Act of Rs 29,675/- which may please be deleted. C. OTHER GROUNDS: 5. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, alter, revise, substitute, or withdraw any or all grounds of the 6 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 appeal at the time of hearing of the appeal, if deemed necessary, in the interest of justice

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT. LTD. ,NASHIK vs. DCIT-CPC, GAZIABAD/ ITO WARD 2(1)-NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

220(2) of the Act of Rs 29,675/- which may please be deleted. C. OTHER GROUNDS: 5. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, alter, revise, substitute, or withdraw any or all grounds of the 6 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 appeal at the time of hearing of the appeal, if deemed necessary, in the interest of justice

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT. LTD. ,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC, GAZIABAD/ ITO WARD 2(1)-NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

220(2) of the Act of Rs 29,675/- which may please be deleted. C. OTHER GROUNDS: 5. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, alter, revise, substitute, or withdraw any or all grounds of the 6 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 appeal at the time of hearing of the appeal, if deemed necessary, in the interest of justice

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT. LTD. ,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC, GAZIABAD/ ITO WARD 2(1)-NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

220(2) of the Act of Rs 29,675/- which may please be deleted. C. OTHER GROUNDS: 5. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, alter, revise, substitute, or withdraw any or all grounds of the 6 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 appeal at the time of hearing of the appeal, if deemed necessary, in the interest of justice

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT. LTD. ,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC, GAZIABAD/ ITO WARD 2(1)-NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

220(2) of the Act of Rs 29,675/- which may please be deleted. C. OTHER GROUNDS: 5. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, alter, revise, substitute, or withdraw any or all grounds of the 6 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 appeal at the time of hearing of the appeal, if deemed necessary, in the interest of justice

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT.LTD,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC,GAZIABAD, NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

220(2) of the Act of Rs 29,675/- which may please be deleted. C. OTHER GROUNDS: 5. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, alter, revise, substitute, or withdraw any or all grounds of the 6 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 appeal at the time of hearing of the appeal, if deemed necessary, in the interest of justice