ASHISH RAMESH OSWAL,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021)\n277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon'ble High Court in the said\ndecision has held that when application under section 245C made by trust is\nallowed to be proceeded with Settlement Commission (ITSC), then ITSC alone\nwould have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as\nprovided

ASHOK BHARTI GOSWAMI ,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021)\n277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon'ble High Court in the said\ndecision has held that when application under section 245C made by trust is\nallowed to be proceeded with Settlement Commission (ITSC), then ITSC alone\nwould have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as\nprovided

DEEPAK KANTILAL JAIN ,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021)\n277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon'ble High Court in the said\ndecision has held that when application under section 245C made by trust is\nallowed to be proceeded with Settlement Commission (ITSC), then ITSC alone\nwould have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as\nprovided

ASHISH RAMESH OSWAL,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021)\n277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon'ble High Court in the said\ndecision has held that when application under section 245C made by trust is\nallowed to be proceeded with Settlement Commission (ITSC), then ITSC alone\nwould have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as\nprovided

ADISH SHANTILAL SOLANKI,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), PUNE, PUNE

Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021)\n277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon'ble High Court in the said\ndecision has held that when application under section 245C made by trust is\nallowed to be proceeded with Settlement Commission (ITSC), then ITSC alone\nwould have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as\nprovided

DEEPAK KANTILAL JAIN,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021)\n277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon'ble High Court in the said\ndecision has held that when application under section 245C made by trust is\nallowed to be proceeded with Settlement Commission (ITSC), then ITSC alone\nwould have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as\nprovided

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT. LTD. ,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC, GAZIABAD/ ITO WARD 2(1)-NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

220(2) of the Act of Rs 29,675/- which may please be deleted. C. OTHER GROUNDS: 5. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, alter, revise, substitute, or withdraw any or all grounds of the 6 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 appeal at the time of hearing of the appeal, if deemed necessary, in the interest of justice

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

220(2) of the Act of Rs 29,675/- which may please be deleted. C. OTHER GROUNDS: 5. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, alter, revise, substitute, or withdraw any or all grounds of the 6 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 appeal at the time of hearing of the appeal, if deemed necessary, in the interest of justice

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-GAZIABAD, NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

220(2) of the Act of Rs 29,675/- which may please be deleted. C. OTHER GROUNDS: 5. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, alter, revise, substitute, or withdraw any or all grounds of the 6 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 appeal at the time of hearing of the appeal, if deemed necessary, in the interest of justice

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

220(2) of the Act of Rs 29,675/- which may please be deleted. C. OTHER GROUNDS: 5. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, alter, revise, substitute, or withdraw any or all grounds of the 6 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 appeal at the time of hearing of the appeal, if deemed necessary, in the interest of justice

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT.LTD,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC,GAZIABAD, NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

220(2) of the Act of Rs 29,675/- which may please be deleted. C. OTHER GROUNDS: 5. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, alter, revise, substitute, or withdraw any or all grounds of the 6 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 appeal at the time of hearing of the appeal, if deemed necessary, in the interest of justice

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

220(2) of the Act of Rs 29,675/- which may please be deleted. C. OTHER GROUNDS: 5. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, alter, revise, substitute, or withdraw any or all grounds of the 6 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 appeal at the time of hearing of the appeal, if deemed necessary, in the interest of justice

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT.LTD,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC,GAZIABAD, NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

220(2) of the Act of Rs 29,675/- which may please be deleted. C. OTHER GROUNDS: 5. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, alter, revise, substitute, or withdraw any or all grounds of the 6 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 appeal at the time of hearing of the appeal, if deemed necessary, in the interest of justice

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT. LTD. ,NASHIK vs. DCIT-CPC, GAZIABAD/ ITO WARD 2(1)-NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

220(2) of the Act of Rs 29,675/- which may please be deleted. C. OTHER GROUNDS: 5. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, alter, revise, substitute, or withdraw any or all grounds of the 6 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 appeal at the time of hearing of the appeal, if deemed necessary, in the interest of justice

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT. LTD. ,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC, GAZIABAD/ ITO WARD 2(1)-NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

220(2) of the Act of Rs 29,675/- which may please be deleted. C. OTHER GROUNDS: 5. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, alter, revise, substitute, or withdraw any or all grounds of the 6 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 appeal at the time of hearing of the appeal, if deemed necessary, in the interest of justice

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT. LTD. ,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC, GAZIABAD/ ITO WARD 2(1)-NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

220(2) of the Act of Rs 29,675/- which may please be deleted. C. OTHER GROUNDS: 5. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, alter, revise, substitute, or withdraw any or all grounds of the 6 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 appeal at the time of hearing of the appeal, if deemed necessary, in the interest of justice

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT. LTD. ,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC, GAZIABAD/ ITO WARD 2(1)-NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

220(2) of the Act of Rs 29,675/- which may please be deleted. C. OTHER GROUNDS: 5. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, alter, revise, substitute, or withdraw any or all grounds of the 6 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 appeal at the time of hearing of the appeal, if deemed necessary, in the interest of justice

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT. LTD. ,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC, GAZIABAD/ ITO WARD 2(1)-NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

220(2) of the Act of Rs 29,675/- which may please be deleted. C. OTHER GROUNDS: 5. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, alter, revise, substitute, or withdraw any or all grounds of the 6 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 appeal at the time of hearing of the appeal, if deemed necessary, in the interest of justice