BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

44 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 200Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai140Pune44Karnataka22Mumbai15Kolkata10Cochin8Delhi5Amritsar4Bangalore3Jodhpur2Hyderabad1Ahmedabad1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 234E332Section 200(3)72Section 200A66Section 200A(1)(c)52TDS44Rectification u/s 15430Section 15426Section 25024Section 20024Charitable Trust

RAM REFRIGERATION AND ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDNAGAR vs. ITO WARD 1, AHMED NAGAR, AHMEDNAGAR

In the result, all the appeals filed the Assessee are allowed

ITA 887/PUN/2025[26Q - Q3- 2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 May 2025
For Appellant: Shri Piyush Bafna, CA &For Respondent: Shri Manish Mehta, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 220(2)Section 234E

section 200A(1)(c) authorising such levy came into force\nw.e.f. 1\" June, 2015 by Finance Act, 2015, consequently the\nfees levied for any default prior thereto being sine auctoritate\nhence unsustainable in the eyes of law. This position finds\nfortified by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Fatheraj\nSinghvi & Ors Vs UOI reported

Showing 1–20 of 44 · Page 1 of 3

24
Section 220(2)18
Penalty14

RAM REFRIGERATION AND ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDNAGAR vs. ITO WARD 1, AHMED NAGAR, AHMED NAGAR

In the result, all the appeals filed the Assessee are allowed

ITA 885/PUN/2025[24Q - Q4- 2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 May 2025
For Appellant: Shri Piyush Bafna, CA &For Respondent: Shri Manish Mehta, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 220(2)Section 234E

section 200A(1)(c) authorising such levy came into force\nw.e.f. 1\" June, 2015 by Finance Act, 2015, consequently the\nfees levied for any default prior thereto being sine auctoritate\nhence unsustainable in the eyes of law. This position finds\nfortified by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Fatheraj\nSinghvi & Ors Vs UOI reported

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT. LTD. ,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC, GAZIABAD/ ITO WARD 2(1)-NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

ITA 2058/PUN/2024[2015-16 QUARTER 4 24Q]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Aakash Parakh And Shri Piyush BafnaFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 156Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234Section 234ESection 246A

section 200A(1)(c) authorising such levy came into force w.e.f. 1" June, 2015 by Finance Act, 2015, consequently the fees levied for any default prior thereto being sine auctoritate hence 10 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 unsustainable in the eyes of law. This position finds fortified by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Fatheraj Singhvi

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT. LTD. ,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC, GAZIABAD/ ITO WARD 2(1)-NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

ITA 2056/PUN/2024[2015-16 QUARTER 2 24Q]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Aakash Parakh And Shri Piyush BafnaFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 156Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234Section 234ESection 246A

section 200A(1)(c) authorising such levy came into force w.e.f. 1" June, 2015 by Finance Act, 2015, consequently the fees levied for any default prior thereto being sine auctoritate hence 10 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 unsustainable in the eyes of law. This position finds fortified by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Fatheraj Singhvi

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT.LTD,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC,GAZIABAD, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

ITA 2050/PUN/2024[2014-15(Q1-24Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Aakash Parakh And Shri Piyush BafnaFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 156Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234Section 234ESection 246A

section 200A(1)(c) authorising such levy came into force w.e.f. 1" June, 2015 by Finance Act, 2015, consequently the fees levied for any default prior thereto being sine auctoritate hence 10 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 unsustainable in the eyes of law. This position finds fortified by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Fatheraj Singhvi

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

ITA 2062/PUN/2024[2015-16 Q-4 26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Aakash Parakh And Shri Piyush BafnaFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 156Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234Section 234ESection 246A

section 200A(1)(c) authorising such levy came into force w.e.f. 1" June, 2015 by Finance Act, 2015, consequently the fees levied for any default prior thereto being sine auctoritate hence 10 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 unsustainable in the eyes of law. This position finds fortified by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Fatheraj Singhvi

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-GAZIABAD, NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

ITA 2060/PUN/2024[2015-16 (Q2-26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Aakash Parakh And Shri Piyush BafnaFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 156Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234Section 234ESection 246A

section 200A(1)(c) authorising such levy came into force w.e.f. 1" June, 2015 by Finance Act, 2015, consequently the fees levied for any default prior thereto being sine auctoritate hence 10 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 unsustainable in the eyes of law. This position finds fortified by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Fatheraj Singhvi

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT. LTD. ,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC, GAZIABAD/ ITO WARD 2(1)-NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

ITA 2054/PUN/2024[2014-15 QUARTER 3 26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Aakash Parakh And Shri Piyush BafnaFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 156Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234Section 234ESection 246A

section 200A(1)(c) authorising such levy came into force w.e.f. 1" June, 2015 by Finance Act, 2015, consequently the fees levied for any default prior thereto being sine auctoritate hence 10 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 unsustainable in the eyes of law. This position finds fortified by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Fatheraj Singhvi

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

ITA 2061/PUN/2024[2015-16 Q-3 26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Aakash Parakh And Shri Piyush BafnaFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 156Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234Section 234ESection 246A

section 200A(1)(c) authorising such levy came into force w.e.f. 1" June, 2015 by Finance Act, 2015, consequently the fees levied for any default prior thereto being sine auctoritate hence 10 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 unsustainable in the eyes of law. This position finds fortified by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Fatheraj Singhvi

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT.LTD,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC,GAZIABAD, NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

ITA 2052/PUN/2024[2014-15(Q3-24Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Aakash Parakh And Shri Piyush BafnaFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 156Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234Section 234ESection 246A

section 200A(1)(c) authorising such levy came into force w.e.f. 1" June, 2015 by Finance Act, 2015, consequently the fees levied for any default prior thereto being sine auctoritate hence 10 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 unsustainable in the eyes of law. This position finds fortified by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Fatheraj Singhvi

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

ITA 2059/PUN/2024[2015-16(Q1) 26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Aakash Parakh And Shri Piyush BafnaFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 156Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234Section 234ESection 246A

section 200A(1)(c) authorising such levy came into force w.e.f. 1" June, 2015 by Finance Act, 2015, consequently the fees levied for any default prior thereto being sine auctoritate hence 10 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 unsustainable in the eyes of law. This position finds fortified by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Fatheraj Singhvi

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT.LTD,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC,GAZIABAD, NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

ITA 2049/PUN/2024[2013-14(Q3-26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Aakash Parakh And Shri Piyush BafnaFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 156Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234Section 234ESection 246A

section 200A(1)(c) authorising such levy came into force w.e.f. 1" June, 2015 by Finance Act, 2015, consequently the fees levied for any default prior thereto being sine auctoritate hence 10 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 unsustainable in the eyes of law. This position finds fortified by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Fatheraj Singhvi

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT.LTD,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC,GAZIABAD, NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

ITA 2051/PUN/2024[2014-15(Q2-24Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Aakash Parakh And Shri Piyush BafnaFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 156Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234Section 234ESection 246A

section 200A(1)(c) authorising such levy came into force w.e.f. 1" June, 2015 by Finance Act, 2015, consequently the fees levied for any default prior thereto being sine auctoritate hence 10 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 unsustainable in the eyes of law. This position finds fortified by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Fatheraj Singhvi

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT. LTD. ,NASHIK vs. DCIT-CPC, GAZIABAD/ ITO WARD 2(1)-NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

ITA 2053/PUN/2024[2014-15 QUARTER 2 26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Aakash Parakh And Shri Piyush BafnaFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 156Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234Section 234ESection 246A

section 200A(1)(c) authorising such levy came into force w.e.f. 1" June, 2015 by Finance Act, 2015, consequently the fees levied for any default prior thereto being sine auctoritate hence 10 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 unsustainable in the eyes of law. This position finds fortified by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Fatheraj Singhvi

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT. LTD. ,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC, GAZIABAD/ ITO WARD 2(1)-NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

ITA 2057/PUN/2024[2015-16 QUARTER 3 24Q]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Aakash Parakh And Shri Piyush BafnaFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 156Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234Section 234ESection 246A

section 200A(1)(c) authorising such levy came into force w.e.f. 1" June, 2015 by Finance Act, 2015, consequently the fees levied for any default prior thereto being sine auctoritate hence 10 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 unsustainable in the eyes of law. This position finds fortified by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Fatheraj Singhvi

PANCHARATNA BUILDCON PVT. LTD. ,PUNE vs. DCIT-CPC, GAZIABAD/ ITO WARD 2(1)-NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

ITA 2055/PUN/2024[2015-16 QUARTER 1 24Q]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Aakash Parakh And Shri Piyush BafnaFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 156Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234Section 234ESection 246A

section 200A(1)(c) authorising such levy came into force w.e.f. 1" June, 2015 by Finance Act, 2015, consequently the fees levied for any default prior thereto being sine auctoritate hence 10 ITA.No.2049 to 2062/PUN./2024 unsustainable in the eyes of law. This position finds fortified by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Fatheraj Singhvi

YASHWANTRAO CHAVAN INSTITUTE OF POLYTECHNIC,BEED vs. ACIT CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL - TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

ITA 2639/PUN/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2637/Pun/2025 Assessment Year : 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Shubham N. RathiFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Dhivare
Section 154Section 200ASection 234E

section 200A(1)(c) authorising such levy came into force w.e.f. 1" June, 2015 by Finance Act, 2015, consequently the fees levied for any default prior thereto being sine auctoritate hence unsustainable in the eyes of law. This position finds fortified by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Fatheraj Singhvi & Ors Vs UOI reported

SHRI SHIVAJI COLLEGE,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL - TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

ITA 2637/PUN/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2637/Pun/2025 Assessment Year : 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Shubham N. RathiFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Dhivare
Section 154Section 200ASection 234E

section 200A(1)(c) authorising such levy came into force w.e.f. 1" June, 2015 by Finance Act, 2015, consequently the fees levied for any default prior thereto being sine auctoritate hence unsustainable in the eyes of law. This position finds fortified by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Fatheraj Singhvi & Ors Vs UOI reported

RAM REFRIGERATION AND ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDNAGAR vs. ITO WARD 1, AHMED NAGAR, AHMEDNAGAR

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

ITA 884/PUN/2025[24Q - Q3- 2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 May 2025

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Piyush Bafna, CA &For Respondent: Shri Manish Mehta, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 220(2)Section 234E

section 200A(1)(c) authorising such levy came into force w.e.f. 1" June, 2015 by Finance Act, 2015, consequently the fees levied for any default prior thereto being sine auctoritate hence unsustainable in the eyes of law. This position finds fortified by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Fatheraj Singhvi & Ors Vs UOI reported

RAM REFRIGERATION AND ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDNAGAR vs. ITO WARD 1, AHMEDNAGAR, AHMEDNAGAR

In the result, ITA.No.2049/PUN

ITA 886/PUN/2025[24Q - Q2- 2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 May 2025

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Piyush Bafna, CA &For Respondent: Shri Manish Mehta, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 220(2)Section 234E

section 200A(1)(c) authorising such levy came into force w.e.f. 1" June, 2015 by Finance Act, 2015, consequently the fees levied for any default prior thereto being sine auctoritate hence unsustainable in the eyes of law. This position finds fortified by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in Fatheraj Singhvi & Ors Vs UOI reported