DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable society under section 139(4A), then its income cannot to be computed in accordance with the provision of the Act. 21. Further, on going through the provisions of section 148, we further note that once the return has been filed in response to the notice issued under section 148, the provisions of this Act shall apply as if such

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable society under section 139(4A), then its income cannot to be computed in accordance with the provision of the Act. 21. Further, on going through the provisions of section 148, we further note that once the return has been filed in response to the notice issued under section 148, the provisions of this Act shall apply as if such

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable society under section 139(4A), then its income cannot to be computed in accordance with the provision of the Act. 21. Further, on going through the provisions of section 148, we further note that once the return has been filed in response to the notice issued under section 148, the provisions of this Act shall apply as if such

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable society under section 139(4A), then its income cannot to be computed in accordance with the provision of the Act. 21. Further, on going through the provisions of section 148, we further note that once the return has been filed in response to the notice issued under section 148, the provisions of this Act shall apply as if such

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable society under section 139(4A), then its income cannot to be computed in accordance with the provision of the Act. 21. Further, on going through the provisions of section 148, we further note that once the return has been filed in response to the notice issued under section 148, the provisions of this Act shall apply as if such

M.M. PATEL PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST,SOLAPUR vs. PCIT- CENTRAL, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Charitable Trust (2022)\n144 taxmann.com 54 (Madras)\n4. Nayyar Patel Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (2022) 137\ntaxmann.com 149 (Kerala)\n5. Bannalal Jat Constructions (P) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of\nIncome-tax (2019) 106 taxтапп.com 128 (SC)\n6. Sri Vidyaranya Seva Sangha Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (2016)\n71 taxmann.com 152 (Bangalore-Trib.)\n7. U.P. Distillers Association

MAHARSHI KARVE STREE SHIKSHAN SAMSTHA vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,,

In the result, both the appeals of assessee and Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.1409/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2008-09 Maharshi Karve Stree Shikshan Samstha Karvenagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411052 …. Pan: Aaatm1969L Vs. The Income Tax Officer, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Ward 11(1), Pune

148 is bad in law since the reasons recorded clearly indicate that the re-opening is made without any tangible material and hence, the re-assessment order passed u/s 147 be declared null and void. 3. The learned C.l.T. (A) has erred in, law and facts in confirming the Assessing Officer's view in denying the exemption U/s.10

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. MAHARSHI KARVE STREE SHIKSHAN SANSTHA,,

In the result, both the appeals of assessee and Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.1409/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2008-09 Maharshi Karve Stree Shikshan Samstha Karvenagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411052 …. Pan: Aaatm1969L Vs. The Income Tax Officer, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Ward 11(1), Pune

148 is bad in law since the reasons recorded clearly indicate that the re-opening is made without any tangible material and hence, the re-assessment order passed u/s 147 be declared null and void. 3. The learned C.l.T. (A) has erred in, law and facts in confirming the Assessing Officer's view in denying the exemption U/s.10

SHREE MARUTI DEVASTHAN,,PUNE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (EXEMPTION),,

In the result, both the appeals of different assessee are allowed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 779/Pun/2016

Charitable Religious Trust. Appellant prays to add after around, modify, clarify and/ or withdraw the ground/s, as accession may demand.” 3. Both the appeals connected to the different assessee on similar issue were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience. However, in order to adjudicate the issue, reference is being made

RAGHAVDAS EDUCATIONAL & MEDICAL FOUNDATION & RESEARCH CENTRE,,PUNE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (EXEMPTION),,

In the result, both the appeals of different assessee are allowed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 779/Pun/2016

Charitable Religious Trust. Appellant prays to add after around, modify, clarify and/ or withdraw the ground/s, as accession may demand.” 3. Both the appeals connected to the different assessee on similar issue were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience. However, in order to adjudicate the issue, reference is being made

PIMPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed and cross objections and appeals of Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.929 To 932/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2005-06 & 2008-09

charitable or religious and hence, would be charged to tax under sub-section (3). As only income disclosed would be eligible for exemption under section 11(1) of the Act, the permitted accumulation of 25% would be calculated with respect to this income. Clause (4) refers to income derived by the trust from house property, interest on securities, capital gains

INCOME-TAX OFFICER vs. PIMPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed and cross objections and appeals of Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.929 To 932/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2005-06 & 2008-09

charitable or religious and hence, would be charged to tax under sub-section (3). As only income disclosed would be eligible for exemption under section 11(1) of the Act, the permitted accumulation of 25% would be calculated with respect to this income. Clause (4) refers to income derived by the trust from house property, interest on securities, capital gains

PIMPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed and cross objections and appeals of Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.929 To 932/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2005-06 & 2008-09

charitable or religious and hence, would be charged to tax under sub-section (3). As only income disclosed would be eligible for exemption under section 11(1) of the Act, the permitted accumulation of 25% would be calculated with respect to this income. Clause (4) refers to income derived by the trust from house property, interest on securities, capital gains

PIMPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed and cross objections and appeals of Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.929 To 932/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2005-06 & 2008-09

charitable or religious and hence, would be charged to tax under sub-section (3). As only income disclosed would be eligible for exemption under section 11(1) of the Act, the permitted accumulation of 25% would be calculated with respect to this income. Clause (4) refers to income derived by the trust from house property, interest on securities, capital gains

PIMPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed and cross objections and appeals of Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.929 To 932/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2005-06 & 2008-09

charitable or religious and hence, would be charged to tax under sub-section (3). As only income disclosed would be eligible for exemption under section 11(1) of the Act, the permitted accumulation of 25% would be calculated with respect to this income. Clause (4) refers to income derived by the trust from house property, interest on securities, capital gains

INCOME-TAX OFFICER vs. PIMPRI CHINCHWAD NEW TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed and cross objections and appeals of Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.929 To 932/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2005-06 & 2008-09

charitable or religious and hence, would be charged to tax under sub-section (3). As only income disclosed would be eligible for exemption under section 11(1) of the Act, the permitted accumulation of 25% would be calculated with respect to this income. Clause (4) refers to income derived by the trust from house property, interest on securities, capital gains

BHANSILAL RAMNATH AGARWAL CHARITABLE TRUST vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita Nos.1147, 1133, 1134 & 1136/Pun/2016 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10 & 2011-12 वष"

Charitable Institutions reported in (2014) 227 Taxmann 369 (SC) h. Jamshetji Tata Trust Vs. JCIT (Exemption) reported in (2014) 148 ITD 388 (Mum) i. Maharashtra Academy of Engineering and Educational Research v. DCIT [ITA Nos. 921 – 923/PN/12] 6. The assessee further submits that once the exemption u/s.11 is allowed on a pro-rata basis, the other grounds of appeal raised

BHANSILAL RAMNATH AGARWAL CHARITABLE TRUST vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita Nos.1147, 1133, 1134 & 1136/Pun/2016 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10 & 2011-12 वष"

Charitable Institutions reported in (2014) 227 Taxmann 369 (SC) h. Jamshetji Tata Trust Vs. JCIT (Exemption) reported in (2014) 148 ITD 388 (Mum) i. Maharashtra Academy of Engineering and Educational Research v. DCIT [ITA Nos. 921 – 923/PN/12] 6. The assessee further submits that once the exemption u/s.11 is allowed on a pro-rata basis, the other grounds of appeal raised

BHANSILAL RAMNATH AGARWAL CHARITABLE TRUST vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita Nos.1147, 1133, 1134 & 1136/Pun/2016 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10 & 2011-12 वष"

Charitable Institutions reported in (2014) 227 Taxmann 369 (SC) h. Jamshetji Tata Trust Vs. JCIT (Exemption) reported in (2014) 148 ITD 388 (Mum) i. Maharashtra Academy of Engineering and Educational Research v. DCIT [ITA Nos. 921 – 923/PN/12] 6. The assessee further submits that once the exemption u/s.11 is allowed on a pro-rata basis, the other grounds of appeal raised