DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable religious trust or institution is expected to file auditor’s report along with the return but in cases where for reasons beyond the control of the assessee some delay has occurred in filing the said report, the ITO, for reasons to be recorded, has been authorised to condone the delay in furnishing the auditor’s report and accepting

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable religious trust or institution is expected to file auditor’s report along with the return but in cases where for reasons beyond the control of the assessee some delay has occurred in filing the said report, the ITO, for reasons to be recorded, has been authorised to condone the delay in furnishing the auditor’s report and accepting

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable religious trust or institution is expected to file auditor’s report along with the return but in cases where for reasons beyond the control of the assessee some delay has occurred in filing the said report, the ITO, for reasons to be recorded, has been authorised to condone the delay in furnishing the auditor’s report and accepting

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable religious trust or institution is expected to file auditor’s report along with the return but in cases where for reasons beyond the control of the assessee some delay has occurred in filing the said report, the ITO, for reasons to be recorded, has been authorised to condone the delay in furnishing the auditor’s report and accepting

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable religious trust or institution is expected to file auditor’s report along with the return but in cases where for reasons beyond the control of the assessee some delay has occurred in filing the said report, the ITO, for reasons to be recorded, has been authorised to condone the delay in furnishing the auditor’s report and accepting

PUNE MATHADI HAMAL AND OTHER MANUAL WORKERS BOARD,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1012/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Pune Mathadihamal & Other The Income Tax Manual Workers Board, V Officer, Shramashakti Bhavan, S Ward-5(1), Pune. Coomercial Plot No.1, Market Yard, Pune – 411037. Pan: Aaalp0097L Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Vipul Joshi – Ar Revenue By Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari & Shri Rajesh Gawali– Dr’S Date Of Hearing 17/04/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 27/06/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Orders Of Ld.Commissionerof Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Under Section 250 Of The Act Dated 14.07.2023 :

145 taxmann.com 278 (Amritsar - Trib.)] (iii) Alpha Educational Trust v. DCIT (Exemption) - [2023] 150 taxmann.com 20 (Chennai - Trib.) III. Proposition 3: If an Application for Registration is not disposed off within 6 months, then same isdeemed to be accepted/approved, in terms of section 12AA(2). Sardari Lai Oberoi memorial Charitable

ASHWINI SAHAKARI RUNGNALAYA & RESEARCH CENTER,,SOLAPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (EXEMPTIONS),, PUNE

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 714/Pun/2018 Ashwini Sahakari Rugnalaya & Research Centre 7107/1, Plot No. 180, North Sadar Bazar, Solapur-413003. Pan: Aaaja0041K . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant

Trust. (iii) the primary object of assessee society as can be seen from the first registered bye-laws (Pg-153-to-193/PB-1) is running a business of hospital, schools, dispensaries & hostels etc., and there is hardly any whisper or provision relating to object of medical relief/charity (iv) the principal object of the assessee as laid in clause 3

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AURANGABAD vs. VISHWATMAK JANGLIMAHARAJ ASHRAM TRUST, KOPARGAON, AHMEDNAGAR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.58/Pun/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Deputy Commissioner Of V Vishwatmak Janglimaharaj Income Tax, S Ashram Trust, Aurangabad. At Kokamthan, Po. Jeur Kumbhari, Kopargaon, Ahmednagar – 423601. Maharashtra. Pan: Aaatv1688B Appellant/ Revenue Respondent / Assessee Assessee By Shri Abhay A Shastri –Ar Revenue By Shri Arvind Desai – Addl.Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 12/03/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 24/03/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac] Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; Dated 13.11.2024 For Assessment Year 2017-18. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :

charitable purpose. The assessee also submitted that their trust is benefited by the exclusion provided under clause (b) of subsection (2) of section 115BBC of the Act and therefore, the donations received by them cannot be treated as ITA No.58/PUN/2025 [R] anonymous donation as per the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 115BBC of the Act. 6.0 I have

GERIATRIC WELLNESS FOUNDATION,PUNE vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri S.S. Godarageriatric Wellness Foundation Cit (Exemption), Pune Lokmanya Hospital, Mitramandal Vs. 484/6, Mitramandal Colony, Parvati, Pune – 411009 Pan : Aafcg8051M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Rajendra Agiwal Department By : Shri Keyur Patel, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 24-04-2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 12-06-2024 O R D E R Per R. K. Panda, Vp :

3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Id. CIT(E) erred in not taking cognizance of the fact that the appellant trust is a section 8 Company registered under Companies Act, 2013 with a charitable object of providing medical relief to the geriatric population and registered u/s 7(2) of the Companies

ASHISH RAMESH OSWAL,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

3), Pune to record the satisfaction, such 153C notice is\ninvalid.\n\n18.\nReferring to the decision of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of\nAdhiprasakthi Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021)\n277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon'ble High Court in the said\ndecision has held that when application under section 245C

DEEPAK KANTILAL JAIN ,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

3), Pune to record the satisfaction, such 153C notice is\ninvalid.\n18. Referring to the decision of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of\nAdhiprasakthi Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021)\n277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon'ble High Court in the said\ndecision has held that when application under section 245C made

CHITRA NARENDRA PARMAR ,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

3), Pune to record the satisfaction, such 153C notice is invalid. 18. Referring to the decision of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Adhiprasakthi Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021) 277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon’ble High Court in the said decision has held that when application under section 245C made

ASHOK BHARTI GOSWAMI,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

3), Pune to record the satisfaction, such 153C notice is invalid. 18. Referring to the decision of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Adhiprasakthi Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021) 277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon’ble High Court in the said decision has held that when application under section 245C made

CHITRA NARENDRA PARMAR,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

3), Pune to record the satisfaction, such 153C notice is invalid. 18. Referring to the decision of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Adhiprasakthi Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021) 277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon’ble High Court in the said decision has held that when application under section 245C made

RAMLAL BHIKULAL SHAH,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

3), Pune to record the satisfaction, such 153C notice is invalid. 18. Referring to the decision of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Adhiprasakthi Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021) 277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon’ble High Court in the said decision has held that when application under section 245C made

RAMANLAL BHIKULAL SHAH,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

3), Pune to record the satisfaction, such 153C notice is invalid. 18. Referring to the decision of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Adhiprasakthi Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021) 277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon’ble High Court in the said decision has held that when application under section 245C made

ADISH SHANTILAL SOLANKI,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), PUNE, PUNE

3), Pune to record the satisfaction, such 153C notice is\ninvalid.\n18. Referring to the decision of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of\nAdhiprasakthi Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021)\n277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon'ble High Court in the said\ndecision has held that when application under section 245C made

ASHOK BHARTI GOSWAMI ,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

3), Pune to record the satisfaction, such 153C notice is\ninvalid.\n18. Referring to the decision of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of\nAdhiprasakthi Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021)\n277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon'ble High Court in the said\ndecision has held that when application under section 245C made

ASHISH RAMESH OSWAL,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

3), Pune to record the satisfaction, such 153C notice is\ninvalid.\n18. Referring to the decision of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of\nAdhiprasakthi Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021)\n277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon'ble High Court in the said\ndecision has held that when application under section 245C made