JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable religious trust or institution is expected to file auditor’s report along with the return but in cases where for reasons beyond the control of the assessee some delay has occurred in filing the said report, the ITO, for reasons to be recorded, has been authorised to condone the delay in furnishing the auditor’s report and accepting

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable religious trust or institution is expected to file auditor’s report along with the return but in cases where for reasons beyond the control of the assessee some delay has occurred in filing the said report, the ITO, for reasons to be recorded, has been authorised to condone the delay in furnishing the auditor’s report and accepting

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable religious trust or institution is expected to file auditor’s report along with the return but in cases where for reasons beyond the control of the assessee some delay has occurred in filing the said report, the ITO, for reasons to be recorded, has been authorised to condone the delay in furnishing the auditor’s report and accepting

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable religious trust or institution is expected to file auditor’s report along with the return but in cases where for reasons beyond the control of the assessee some delay has occurred in filing the said report, the ITO, for reasons to be recorded, has been authorised to condone the delay in furnishing the auditor’s report and accepting

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable religious trust or institution is expected to file auditor’s report along with the return but in cases where for reasons beyond the control of the assessee some delay has occurred in filing the said report, the ITO, for reasons to be recorded, has been authorised to condone the delay in furnishing the auditor’s report and accepting

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable religious trust or institution is expected to file auditor’s report along with the return but in cases where for reasons beyond the control of the assessee some delay has occurred in filing the said report, the ITO, for reasons to be recorded, has been authorised to condone the delay in furnishing the auditor’s report and accepting

AGRA OBSTETRICAL AND GYNAECOLOGICAL SOCIETY,AGRA vs. PCIT, CENTRAL, PUNE

charitable\ntrust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950. It\nwas formed on 27.01.1977 and firstly it was granted registered\nunder the regulatory law on 30.09.1977 and thereafter\nregistration under the old regime was granted u/s.12A on\n04.12.1982. Main objects of POGS from its Memorandum of\nAssociation are to promote (i) professional Fellowship amongst the\nmembers; (ii) to encourage

THE MUMBAI OBSTETRIC GYNAECOLOGICAL SOCIETY,LOW PAREL (W) vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), PUNE, PUNE

charitable\ntrust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950. It\nwas formed on 27.01.1977 and firstly it was granted registered\nunder the regulatory law on 30.09.1977 and thereafter\nregistration under the old regime was granted u/s.12A on\n04.12.1982. Main objects of POGS from its Memorandum of\nAssociation are to promote (i) professional Fellowship amongst the\nmembers; (ii) to encourage

PUNE MATHADI HAMAL AND OTHER MANUAL WORKERS BOARD,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1012/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Pune Mathadihamal & Other The Income Tax Manual Workers Board, V Officer, Shramashakti Bhavan, S Ward-5(1), Pune. Coomercial Plot No.1, Market Yard, Pune – 411037. Pan: Aaalp0097L Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Vipul Joshi – Ar Revenue By Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari & Shri Rajesh Gawali– Dr’S Date Of Hearing 17/04/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 27/06/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Orders Of Ld.Commissionerof Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Under Section 250 Of The Act Dated 14.07.2023 :

Charitable Trust v. ITO [2005] 3 SOT 229 (Delhi)] SambandhOrganisation v. CIT [(2006) 156 Taxman 183 (Delhi)] 5 Pune Mathadi Hamal and Other Manual Workers Board [A] CIT v. Society for Promn. Of Edn. Allahabad [(2016)382 ITR 6 (SC)] CIT v. Sahitya sadawart Samiti Jaipur [(2017) 396 ITR 46 (Rajasthan)] CIT v. TBI Education Trust [(2018) 96 Taxmann.com

CAPGEMINI TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INDIA LIMITED,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PUNE

charitable trust or institution. We find that\nrecently Co-ordinate Bench of Mumbai Tribunal in DCIT Vs Gabriel India (2025)\n173 taxmann.com 219 (Mum) on similar issue where the assessee-company\nclaimed deduction under section 80G at the rate of 50% of CSR expenses and\nfurnished receipts of donees evidencing eligibility of deduction under section 80G\nallowed claim of such

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE ,, PUNE vs. THE BISHOPS EDUCATION SOCIETY,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

charitable or religious institutions are governed by almost the separate or independent provisions of Section 11,12, 12A, 12AA & 13 and these provisions are independent code in itself in Chapter III of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and claim of depreciation u/s 32 comes under Chapter IV of the Act under the head ‘D’ - Profit and Gains of Business

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE ,, PUNE vs. SHIVNAGAR VIDYA PRASARAK MANDAL,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

charitable or religious institutions are governed by almost the separate or independent provisions of Section 11,12, 12A, 12AA & 13 and these provisions are independent code in itself in Chapter III of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and claim of depreciation u/s 32 comes under Chapter IV of the Act under the head ‘D’ - Profit and Gains of Business

SHAHU SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL, LATUR,LATUR vs. ACIT (EXMP.) CIRCLE, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurposes

section 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act should be\nallowed to the assessee declaring taxable income of the trust at Rs. Nil.\n6.4 He further submitted that both the Ld. AO and the Ld. CIT(A) has\nerred in disallowing the claim of the assessee u/s 57 of the Act for\nexpenditure incurred by the assessee trust on the ground

NYATI BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

charitable institutions, etc.\" These\noutlays are not eligible for 80G deduction.\nMandatory Nature\nIn this regard, Explanatory notes to Finance No. (2) Act, 2014 are being\nreproduced as under :\nCorporate Social Responsibility (CSR)\nUinder the Companies Act, 2013 certain companies (which have net worth of\nRs.500 crore or more, or turnover of Rs.1000 crore or more, or a net profit

SHRI TRIMBAKESHWAR DE vs. THAN TRUST,NASHIKVS.CIT (EXEMPTION) PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1051/Pun/2024

135 ITR 485, this court also has taken the view that taking into account the purpose for which the conditions of s. 11(1)(a) are imposed, it would be clear that the income to be considered will be that which is available in the hands of the assessee subject to any adjustment for any expenses extraneous to the trust

HARMONY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION,PUNE vs. CIT(E), PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is dismissed

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No.1993/Pun/2024 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2025-26 Harmony Educational V The Commissioner Of Foundation, S Income Tax(Exemption), 1430, Satav Vasti, Wagholi Pune. Lohegaon Road, Wagholi, Pune – 411047. Maharashtra. Pan: Aafch1576E Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Ca Abhay A Avchat & Mrs.Ruchi Agarwal(Director) – Ar Revenue By Shri Amol Khairnar – Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 28/10/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 31/10/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemption) Dated 24.07.2024 Rejecting Registration Under Section 12A(1)(Ac) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

charitable nature and the genuineness of activities of the assessee and compliance to requirements of any other law for the time being in force by the trust / institution as are material for the purpose of achieving its objects. Therefore, the application filed by the assessee is hereby rejected and the provisional registration granted on 28/05/2021 under section 12AB read with

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE ,, PUNE vs. VIDYA PRATISHTHAN,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue for A

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.2549 & 2550/Pun/2017 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2008-09 & 2009-10

charitable trust double deduction is allowable. These cases are asunder : (a) CIT v. Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS) (2003) 264 ITR 110 (Bom). A.Ys. 2008-09 & 2009-10 (b) G.K.R. Charities v. Deputy Direcotr of IT (Exemptions)-I (2012) 051 SOT 0538 (Chen Trib). (c) CIT v. Society of The Sisters of St. Anne

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE ,, PUNE vs. VIDYA PRATISHTHAN,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue for A

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.2549 & 2550/Pun/2017 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2008-09 & 2009-10

charitable trust double deduction is allowable. These cases are asunder : (a) CIT v. Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS) (2003) 264 ITR 110 (Bom). A.Ys. 2008-09 & 2009-10 (b) G.K.R. Charities v. Deputy Direcotr of IT (Exemptions)-I (2012) 051 SOT 0538 (Chen Trib). (c) CIT v. Society of The Sisters of St. Anne