POONA OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGICAL SOCIETY,PUNE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL, PUNE, PUNE

charitable\ntrust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950. It\nwas formed on 27.01.1977 and firstly it was granted registered\nunder the regulatory law on 30.09.1977 and thereafter\nregistration under the old regime was granted u/s.12A on\n04.12.1982. Main objects of POGS from its Memorandum of\nAssociation are to promote (i) professional Fellowship amongst the\nmembers; (ii) to encourage

SWASTHIYOG PRATISHTHAN,,SANGLI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Raviआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.1296/Pun/2019 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2015-16 Swasthiyog Pratishthan, Vs. Dcit (Exemptions) C/O. Dr. Gs Kulkarni, Circle, Pune. Orthopedic Hospital, Extension Area, Miraj, Sangli- 416410. Pan : Aaats5400L Appellant Respondent

8. The ld. AR submits that the appellant trust was allowed to use the hospital rooms owned by Dr. G.S. Kulkarni to pursue its charitable objects without charging any rent or consideration. Dr. G. S. Kulkarni and his two sons, family members were rendering voluntarily professional services to the appellant trust without charging any fees from the appellant trust. Thus

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, PUNE vs. MUKUND BHAVAN TRUST,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

charitable cum religious trust on the ground that trust violated the terms of the trust deed. Hence, considering the above discussion and several judicial pronouncement it is held that on present fact it cannot be said that the application of income or fund has not been applied towards the object of the trust. Accordingly, the view

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE, PUNE, SWARGATE,PUNE vs. SHRI MUKUND BHAVAN TRUST, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Astha Chandraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.829 & 827/Pun/2025 धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Years : 2017-18 & 2018-19 Dy. Commissioner Of Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust, Income Tax (Exemptions), 1105, Ravivar Peth, Pune-411002 Cirlce – Pune Vs. Pan : Aaats5170R अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Assesseeby : Shri V.L. Jain Department By : Shri Amol Khairnar Date Of Hearing : 24-07-2025 Date Of 08-10-2025 Pronouncement :

charitable institution created or established after the commencement of this Act, any income thereof if the trust or institution is created or established for the benefit of any particular religious community or caste” AYs 2017-18 & 2018-19 29. A perusal of the same would show that the provisions of section 11 not to apply in certain cases if such

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE, PUNE, SWARGATE,PUNE vs. SHRI MUKUND BHAVAN TRUST, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Astha Chandraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.829 & 827/Pun/2025 धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Years : 2017-18 & 2018-19 Dy. Commissioner Of Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust, Income Tax (Exemptions), 1105, Ravivar Peth, Pune-411002 Cirlce – Pune Vs. Pan : Aaats5170R अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Assesseeby : Shri V.L. Jain Department By : Shri Amol Khairnar Date Of Hearing : 24-07-2025 Date Of 08-10-2025 Pronouncement :

charitable institution created or established after the commencement of this Act, any income thereof if the trust or institution is created or established for the benefit of any particular religious community or caste” AYs 2017-18 & 2018-19 29. A perusal of the same would show that the provisions of section 11 not to apply in certain cases if such

GOLDEN CHARITABLE TRUST,SANGLI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.933/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :- Golden Charitable Trust, The Cit Exemption, 2349, Guruwar Peth, Miraj, V Pune. Maharashtra – 416410. S Pan: Aactg0998H Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Kishor B Phadke – Ar Revenue By Shri Keyur Patel – Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 24/01/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 12/04/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemption), Pune Under Section 12Ab Of The Income Tax Act, 1961, Passed On 30.06.2023.The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal : “1. Learned Cit (Exemption) Has Erred In Fact & In Law In Rejecting The Application For The Registration Of The Trust U/S. 12A(1) (Ac) Despite The Fact That Appellant Trust Is Engaged In Pursuing Purely Charitable Objects Such As Providing Medical & Educational Aid To Needy Beneficiaries & The Trust Activities Are Genuine & There Is No Contrary Finding To It. Thus The Rejection Order Is Patently Illegal & Golden Charitable Trust [A]

8 Golden Charitable Trust [A] Violation of The Maharashtra Public Trust Act : 6.6 Assessee is registered under Charity Commissioner, Sangli, Maharashtra. As per Section 36 of Maharashtra Public Trust Act, it is mandatory to seek prior permission from Charity Commissioner before entering into any lease of immovable property for a period more than three years. In the case

AIDS SOCIETY OF INDIA,MUMBAI vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), PUNE

charitable trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950. It was formed on 27.01.1977 and firstly it was granted registered under the regulatory law on 30.09.1977 and thereafter registration under the old regime was granted u/s.12A on 04.12.1982. Main objects of POGS from its Memorandum of Association are to promote (i) professional Fellowship amongst the members; (ii) to encourage

DWARAKA CHARITABLE TRUST,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,,

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Charitable Institutions (supra) inter alia, places reliance upon the decision of this Court in DIT v/s. Sheth Mafatlal Gagalbahai Foundation Trust 249 ITR 533 and the Delhi High Court in the case of IT (Exemption) v/s. Agrim Charan 8 ITA No.723/PUN/2015, A.Y. 2007-08 Foundation 253 ITR 593. Moreover, on a plain reading of Sections 11 and 13

AGRA OBSTETRICAL AND GYNAECOLOGICAL SOCIETY,AGRA vs. PCIT, CENTRAL, PUNE

charitable\ntrust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950. It\nwas formed on 27.01.1977 and firstly it was granted registered\nunder the regulatory law on 30.09.1977 and thereafter\nregistration under the old regime was granted u/s.12A on\n04.12.1982. Main objects of POGS from its Memorandum of\nAssociation are to promote (i) professional Fellowship amongst the\nmembers; (ii) to encourage

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

13. The reference is accordingly answered in favour of the assessee and against the Department.” 43. We find the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Shahzadanand Charity Trust reported in 228 ITR 292 (P&H) has also held that as ITA Nos.1153, 1155 & 1154/MUM/2016 per the provisions of section 11 prevailing at that time

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

13. The reference is accordingly answered in favour of the assessee and against the Department.” 43. We find the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Shahzadanand Charity Trust reported in 228 ITR 292 (P&H) has also held that as ITA Nos.1153, 1155 & 1154/MUM/2016 per the provisions of section 11 prevailing at that time

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

13. The reference is accordingly answered in favour of the assessee and against the Department.” 43. We find the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Shahzadanand Charity Trust reported in 228 ITR 292 (P&H) has also held that as ITA Nos.1153, 1155 & 1154/MUM/2016 per the provisions of section 11 prevailing at that time

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

13. The reference is accordingly answered in favour of the assessee and against the Department.” 43. We find the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Shahzadanand Charity Trust reported in 228 ITR 292 (P&H) has also held that as ITA Nos.1153, 1155 & 1154/MUM/2016 per the provisions of section 11 prevailing at that time

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

13. The reference is accordingly answered in favour of the assessee and against the Department.” 43. We find the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Shahzadanand Charity Trust reported in 228 ITR 292 (P&H) has also held that as ITA Nos.1153, 1155 & 1154/MUM/2016 per the provisions of section 11 prevailing at that time

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

13. The reference is accordingly answered in favour of the assessee and against the Department.” 43. We find the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Shahzadanand Charity Trust reported in 228 ITR 292 (P&H) has also held that as ITA Nos.1153, 1155 & 1154/MUM/2016 per the provisions of section 11 prevailing at that time

AUDYOGIK NIDHI VISHWAST SANSTHA POONA,PUNE vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE, PMT BUILDING

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraaudyogik Nidhi Vishwast Sanstha The Cit (Exemption), Poona Pune 366, Narayan Peth, Limaye Vs. Building, Laxmi Road, Pune – 411030 Pan: Aaata1619H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Nikhil S Pathak Department By : Shri Amol Khairnar Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 05-02-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 30-04-2025 O R D E R

8. Further, the trust's claim of the educational fund purportedly set aside also casts doubt on its commitment to its stated charitable objectives. The trust claimed that a sum of Rs 11.45 Lakhs was allocated to facilitate education for poor and deprived children. However, there is no evidence provided to substantiate this claim The trust failed to furnish

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PUNE BRANCH,SHUKRAWAR PETH vs. DCIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE PUNE, SWARGATE

In the result, all the 5 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

8. Referring to the decision of Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Sarvodaya Charitable Trust reported in 125 taxman.com 75, he submitted that the Hon’ble High Court in the said decision has held that the claim of exemption u/s 11 cannot be denied only on the ground that there was a delay in filing the audit

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PUNE BRANCH,SHUKRAWAR PETH vs. DCIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE, PUNE, SWARGATE

In the result, all the 5 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

8. Referring to the decision of Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Sarvodaya Charitable Trust reported in 125 taxman.com 75, he submitted that the Hon’ble High Court in the said decision has held that the claim of exemption u/s 11 cannot be denied only on the ground that there was a delay in filing the audit