DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

127, wherein the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal has held that failure to file the return u/s 139(4A) cannot be interpreted to mean that income cannot be computed in case of a charitable trust u/s 11 of the Act. It has been held that a new clause (ba) has been inserted in section

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

127, wherein the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal has held that failure to file the return u/s 139(4A) cannot be interpreted to mean that income cannot be computed in case of a charitable trust u/s 11 of the Act. It has been held that a new clause (ba) has been inserted in section

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

127, wherein the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal has held that failure to file the return u/s 139(4A) cannot be interpreted to mean that income cannot be computed in case of a charitable trust u/s 11 of the Act. It has been held that a new clause (ba) has been inserted in section

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

127, wherein the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal has held that failure to file the return u/s 139(4A) cannot be interpreted to mean that income cannot be computed in case of a charitable trust u/s 11 of the Act. It has been held that a new clause (ba) has been inserted in section

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

127, wherein the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal has held that failure to file the return u/s 139(4A) cannot be interpreted to mean that income cannot be computed in case of a charitable trust u/s 11 of the Act. It has been held that a new clause (ba) has been inserted in section

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, PUNE vs. MUKUND BHAVAN TRUST,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

127 ITR 378 (A.P.)]. Further, in the case of CIT vs. Baroda Industrial Development Corporation Limited, (1986) 24 Taxman 36, the Gujarat High Court held that the Income Tax liability of a Charitable Trust has to be deducted as a necessary outgoing before the net income capable of obligation for the purpose of the Trust under Section

M.M. PATEL PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST,SOLAPUR vs. PCIT- CENTRAL, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

charitable purpose\ncreated or established after the commencement of this Act, has\napplied any part of its income for the benefit of any particular\nreligious community or caste; or\n(e) any activity being carried out by the trust or institution,-\n(i) is not genuine; or\n(ii) is not being carried out in accordance with

SHRI MULTANCHAND BORA TRUST,PUNE vs. ACIT, EXEMPTION, CIRCLE- AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD

In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No.1312/Pun/2025 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2020-21 Shri Multanchand Bora Trust, V The Assistant/Deputy 132B/2A, Ganeshkhind Road, S. Commissioner Of Income Pune – 411007. Tax, Exemption Circle, Aurangabad. Pan: Aafts3329F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Shrenik Gandhi Revenue By Shri Amit Bobde –Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 11/09/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 09/12/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemption), Pune At Nashik Passed Under Section 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For A.Y.2020-21, Dated 30.03.2025 Emanating From Assessment Order U/S.143(3) Of The I.T.Act, Dated 20.09.2022. The Assessee Has Raised Following Grounds Of Appeal : “1. Ground No. 1: The Learned Cit (Exemption) Seriously Erred On The Facts & Law, In Exercising The Revisionary Powers Under Section

charitable purpose. It is mandatory for the Assessing Officer to follow the CBDT Instructions/Circulars. In this case by not conducting the inquiry regarding activities of the DONEE trusts the Assessing Officer has violated the CBDT instruction. 9.4 In this context, we will like to refer to the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Commissioner

SHRI AKHIL BHARTIYA SAMARTH JAIN SHRAVAK SANGH,NASHIK vs. EXEMPTION WARD 1(1), NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

charitable cum religious activities. 2. On 15/10/2001, appellant trust received the provisional registration certificate under section80G(5)(iv) of ITA, 1961. 3. Further, appellant trust applied for regular registration u/s 80G(5)(iii) of ITA, 1961 on 03/05/2022 by filing Form 10AB. 4. Subsequently healing notices were issued by the learned CIT(E) and said notices were unfortunately and unintentionally

SHRI TRIMBAKESHWAR DE vs. THAN TRUST,NASHIKVS.CIT (EXEMPTION) PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1051/Pun/2024

127 ITR 378, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, while dealing with the scope of s. 11(4) of the Act, had expressed the view that only such of the income which is left after deducting the expenditure or such of the 12 Shri Trimbakeshwar Devsthan Trust money which is left with th trust after meeting all the expenditure, that

CHITRA NARENDRA PARMAR ,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021) 277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon’ble High Court in the said decision has held that when application under section 245C made by trust is allowed to be proceeded with Settlement Commission (ITSC), then ITSC alone would have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as provided

CHITRA NARENDRA PARMAR,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021) 277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon’ble High Court in the said decision has held that when application under section 245C made by trust is allowed to be proceeded with Settlement Commission (ITSC), then ITSC alone would have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as provided

RAMLAL BHIKULAL SHAH,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021) 277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon’ble High Court in the said decision has held that when application under section 245C made by trust is allowed to be proceeded with Settlement Commission (ITSC), then ITSC alone would have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as provided

RAMANLAL BHIKULAL SHAH,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021) 277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon’ble High Court in the said decision has held that when application under section 245C made by trust is allowed to be proceeded with Settlement Commission (ITSC), then ITSC alone would have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as provided

ASHOK BHARTI GOSWAMI,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021) 277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon’ble High Court in the said decision has held that when application under section 245C made by trust is allowed to be proceeded with Settlement Commission (ITSC), then ITSC alone would have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as provided

ASHISH RAMESH OSWAL,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021)\n277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon'ble High Court in the said\ndecision has held that when application under section 245C made by trust is\nallowed to be proceeded with Settlement Commission (ITSC), then ITSC alone\nwould have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as\nprovided

DEEPAK KANTILAL JAIN ,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021)\n277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon'ble High Court in the said\ndecision has held that when application under section 245C made by trust is\nallowed to be proceeded with Settlement Commission (ITSC), then ITSC alone\nwould have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as\nprovided

ADISH SHANTILAL SOLANKI,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), PUNE, PUNE

Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021)\n277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon'ble High Court in the said\ndecision has held that when application under section 245C made by trust is\nallowed to be proceeded with Settlement Commission (ITSC), then ITSC alone\nwould have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as\nprovided

ASHISH RAMESH OSWAL,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), PUNE , PUNE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust vs. DGIT (2021)\n277 Taxman 355 (Mad), he submitted that the Hon'ble High Court in the said\ndecision has held that when application under section 245C made by trust is\nallowed to be proceeded with Settlement Commission (ITSC), then ITSC alone\nwould have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as\nprovided