SETH RAMDAS NATHUBHAI DHARMADAYA VISHWASTA NIDHI,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,(EXEMPTIONS) -1,, PUNE

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury"नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Seth Ramdas Nathubhai Dharmadaya Vs. Ito Vishwasta Nidhi, (Exemptions)-1, C/O. Shah Khandelwal Jain & Pune Associates, Chartered Accountants, Level 3, Business Bay, Plot No.84, Wellesley Road, Near Rto, Pune 411 001 Pan : Aaatr6805N Appellant Respondent

12 of the Act was denied by the AO for infringements of provisions of section 29 Seth Ramdas Nathubhai Dharmadaya Vishwasta Nidhi 13(2)/13(l)(c), which were also confirmed by the Hon’ble Courts. The same are as below : 1. Kanhya Lai Punj Charitable Trust

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PUNE BRANCH,SHUKRAWAR PETH vs. DCIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE, PUNE, SWARGATE

In the result, all the 5 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

12 in case of omission to furnish such report in the prescribed form along with the return. 2. Normally, it should be possible for a charitable or religious trust or institution to file the auditor's report along with the return of total income, where such trust or institution claims exemption under sections

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PUNE BRANCH,SHUKRAWAR PETH vs. DCIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE, PUNE, SWARGATE

In the result, all the 5 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

12 in case of omission to furnish such report in the prescribed form along with the return. 2. Normally, it should be possible for a charitable or religious trust or institution to file the auditor's report along with the return of total income, where such trust or institution claims exemption under sections

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PUNE BRANCH,SHUKRAWAR PETH vs. DCIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE, PUNE, SWARGATE

In the result, all the 5 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

12 in case of omission to furnish such report in the prescribed form along with the return. 2. Normally, it should be possible for a charitable or religious trust or institution to file the auditor's report along with the return of total income, where such trust or institution claims exemption under sections

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PUNE BRANCH,SHUKRAWAR PETH vs. DCIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE PUNE, SWARGATE

In the result, all the 5 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

12 in case of omission to furnish such report in the prescribed form along with the return. 2. Normally, it should be possible for a charitable or religious trust or institution to file the auditor's report along with the return of total income, where such trust or institution claims exemption under sections

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PUNE BRANCH,SHUKRAWAR PETH vs. DCIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE, PUNE, SWARGATE

In the result, all the 5 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

12 in case of omission to furnish such report in the prescribed form along with the return. 2. Normally, it should be possible for a charitable or religious trust or institution to file the auditor's report along with the return of total income, where such trust or institution claims exemption under sections

SHRI MUKUND BHAVAN TRUST,PUNE vs. CIT(E), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrashri Mukund Bhavan Trust Cit (Exemption), Pune 1105, Raviwar Peth, Mukund Vs. Bhavan, Pune – 411002 Pan: Aaats5170R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri V.L. Jain Department By : Shri Mallikarjun Utture, Cit Date Of Hearing : 05-02-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 29-04-2025 O R D E R

2 of the Deed, the settlor has imposed restrictions on the trust properties transferred by him to the trust for donating the same to any other person and has further imposed a condition that some part of these trust properties are to be allowed to be utilized by the settlor and his heirs without any rent or other charges

ASSISTANT OINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. PYC HINDU GYMKHANA,, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical

Bench: Shri "याियक सद"य के सम" D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.179/Pun/2015 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11 िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष"

charitable trust. Assessee trust is also engaged in the activity of running restaurant, bar, card club, venue hall and sport activity. Assessee claimed that all these activities are covered u/s.2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1962. Assessee claimed that the main object of the assessee relates to promotion of sports. Assessee filed the return of income declaring ‘Nil’. During

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable or religious purpose has been exempted from payment of tax. Section 12A provides that the provisions of Sections 11 and 12 shall not apply in relation to the income of any trust or institution unless the two conditions provided in Clauses (a) and (b) of this section are fulfilled. Clause (b) of Section 12A which is relevant

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable or religious purpose has been exempted from payment of tax. Section 12A provides that the provisions of Sections 11 and 12 shall not apply in relation to the income of any trust or institution unless the two conditions provided in Clauses (a) and (b) of this section are fulfilled. Clause (b) of Section 12A which is relevant

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable or religious purpose has been exempted from payment of tax. Section 12A provides that the provisions of Sections 11 and 12 shall not apply in relation to the income of any trust or institution unless the two conditions provided in Clauses (a) and (b) of this section are fulfilled. Clause (b) of Section 12A which is relevant

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable or religious purpose has been exempted from payment of tax. Section 12A provides that the provisions of Sections 11 and 12 shall not apply in relation to the income of any trust or institution unless the two conditions provided in Clauses (a) and (b) of this section are fulfilled. Clause (b) of Section 12A which is relevant

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable or religious purpose has been exempted from payment of tax. Section 12A provides that the provisions of Sections 11 and 12 shall not apply in relation to the income of any trust or institution unless the two conditions provided in Clauses (a) and (b) of this section are fulfilled. Clause (b) of Section 12A which is relevant

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

charitable or religious purpose has been exempted from payment of tax. Section 12A provides that the provisions of Sections 11 and 12 shall not apply in relation to the income of any trust or institution unless the two conditions provided in Clauses (a) and (b) of this section are fulfilled. Clause (b) of Section 12A which is relevant

POONA OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGICAL SOCIETY,PUNE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL, PUNE, PUNE

12 of the Act\nand hence even as per subsection (4) of section 12AA of the Act,\nregistration granted to the assessee trust is liable to be cancelled.\n15. With regard to the cancellation of registration of trust, the Hon'ble\nSupreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Jagannath Gupta Family Trust\nreported

DHARMBHASKAR RASHTRASANT SHRIPACHLEGAVKAR MAHARJ PRATISHTAN,PUNE vs. EXEMPTION WARD 1(2), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

12\nupon subsequent registration viz-a-viz the trusts whose assessments are\nfinalized, the Ld. AR submitted as under :\n\"1. Legislative Intent and Fairness:\nThe proviso to Section 12A(2), introduced by the Finance (No. 2) Act,\n2014 (w.e.f. 01/10/2014), aims to provide relief to trusts facing tax\nliability due to delayed registration despite fulfilling substantive\ncharitable conditions

DHARMBHASKAR RASHTRASANT SHRIPACHLEGAVKAR MAHARJ PRATISHTAN,PUNE vs. EXEMPTION WARD 1(2), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

12\nupon subsequent registration viz-a-viz the trusts whose assessments are\nfinalized, the Ld. AR submitted as under :\n\"1. Legislative Intent and Fairness:\nΟ\nThe proviso to Section 12A(2), introduced by the Finance (No. 2) Act,\n2014 (w.e.f. 01/10/2014), aims to provide relief to trusts facing tax\nliability due to delayed registration despite fulfilling substantive\ncharitable conditions

CREDAI - PUNE METRO,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, PUNE

charitable trust advancing work of general public utility and certainly not hit by the first proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act. Since the Assessing Officer has denied the benefit of sections 11 and 12

INCOME TAX OFFICERV(EXEMPTION) WARD 2, PUNE vs. CREDIA PUNE METRO , PUNE

charitable trust advancing work of general public utility and certainly not hit by the first proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act. Since the Assessing Officer has denied the benefit of sections 11 and 12