BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

322 results for “charitable trust”+ Natural Justiceclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai404Delhi339Pune322Ahmedabad287Chennai275Jaipur221Bangalore179Hyderabad139Surat91Amritsar69Chandigarh63Kolkata58Visakhapatnam49Lucknow49Indore46Cochin40Nagpur36Rajkot35Allahabad30Agra27Jodhpur27Cuttack25Panaji20Raipur17Patna13Jabalpur12Dehradun9SC8Ranchi6Guwahati4Varanasi3

Key Topics

Section 12A274Section 80G120Section 234E117Section 12A(1)(ac)89Exemption86Section 80G(5)70Charitable Trust47Natural Justice43Section 200A39Section 143(1)

SHRI MUKUND BHAVAN TRUST,PUNE vs. CIT(E), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1552/PUN/2024[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandrashri Mukund Bhavan Trust Cit (Exemption), Pune 1105, Raviwar Peth, Mukund Vs. Bhavan, Pune – 411002 Pan: Aaats5170R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri V.L. Jain Department By : Shri Mallikarjun Utture, Cit Date Of Hearing : 05-02-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 29-04-2025 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri V.L. JainFor Respondent: Shri Mallikarjun Utture, CIT
Section 12ASection 13(1)(a)

Charitable activities. Therefore, the same is violation of section 12AB(1)(b)(i)(B) By not registering itself with the Charity Commissioner or any other relevant law applicable to the Public Trust, the assessee is found to be involved in specific violation under clause 'f of explanation to sub-section 12AB(4) ……....As per discussions in para

GOLDEN CHARITABLE TRUST,SANGLI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION PUNE, PUNE

Showing 1–20 of 322 · Page 1 of 17

...
17
Section 1115
TDS14

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 933/PUN/2023[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Apr 2024

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.933/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :- Golden Charitable Trust, The Cit Exemption, 2349, Guruwar Peth, Miraj, V Pune. Maharashtra – 416410. S Pan: Aactg0998H Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Kishor B Phadke – Ar Revenue By Shri Keyur Patel – Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 24/01/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 12/04/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemption), Pune Under Section 12Ab Of The Income Tax Act, 1961, Passed On 30.06.2023.The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal : “1. Learned Cit (Exemption) Has Erred In Fact & In Law In Rejecting The Application For The Registration Of The Trust U/S. 12A(1) (Ac) Despite The Fact That Appellant Trust Is Engaged In Pursuing Purely Charitable Objects Such As Providing Medical & Educational Aid To Needy Beneficiaries & The Trust Activities Are Genuine & There Is No Contrary Finding To It. Thus The Rejection Order Is Patently Illegal & Golden Charitable Trust [A]

Section 119(2)(b)Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)Section 80G

charitable objects and the violations of Trust Act mentioned by CIT (exemption) which is non obtaining of permission of charity commissioner is technical in nature and curable one and appellant did inform that it will seek the permission and hence the order is in gross violation of principles of natural justice

SHRI GAYATRI SANSHODHAN SEVA MANDAL,PUNE vs. CIT EXEMPTIONS, CIT EXEMPTION PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1361/PUN/2023[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 Jun 2024AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Sharad A. ShahFor Respondent: Shri Keyur Patel
Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

Justice Denied: The show cause notice was received dated 05th October 2023 and response due date 10th October to which the trust has replied within due date where in was stated that the activities during the past three years were of religious nature however now onwards after change of object clause the activity of the trust will be of educational

MAHARASHTRA CRICKET ASSOCIATION,PUNE vs. ACIT(E), PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1387/PUN/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune11 Apr 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Astha Chandraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1387 & 975/Pun/2024 धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Years : 2011-12 & 2012-13 Maharashtra Cricket Association, Acit(E), Pune Gahunje Stadium, At Post Gahunje, Thehsil-Maval, Pune-412101 Vs. Pan : Aaatm2192D अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Assessee By : Shri C.H. Naniwadekar & Kiran Sanmane Department By : Shri Amol Khairnar Date Of Hearing : 16-01-2025 Date Of 11-04-2025 Pronouncement : आदेश / Order Per Astha Chandra, Jm : Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Two Separate Orders Dated 22.04.2024 & 12.03.2024 Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/Nfac, Delhi [“Cit(A)”] Pertaining To Assessment Years (“Ays”) 2011-12 & 2012-13. Since The Issue(S) Involved Are Identical, These Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Shri C.H. Naniwadekar &For Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 11Section 2(15)

charitable but commercial in nature and denied the assessee’s claim of exemption by applying the amended provisions of section 2(15) of the Act which has been upheld by the Ld. CIT(A). Before us, the Ld. AR has contended that the issue pertaining to cancellation of registration of the assessee trust u/s 12A of the Act is pending

MAHARASHTRA CRICKET ASSOCIATION,PUNE vs. ACIT(E), PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 975/PUN/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune11 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Astha Chandraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1387 & 975/Pun/2024 धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Years : 2011-12 & 2012-13 Maharashtra Cricket Association, Acit(E), Pune Gahunje Stadium, At Post Gahunje, Thehsil-Maval, Pune-412101 Vs. Pan : Aaatm2192D अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Assessee By : Shri C.H. Naniwadekar & Kiran Sanmane Department By : Shri Amol Khairnar Date Of Hearing : 16-01-2025 Date Of 11-04-2025 Pronouncement : आदेश / Order Per Astha Chandra, Jm : Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Two Separate Orders Dated 22.04.2024 & 12.03.2024 Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/Nfac, Delhi [“Cit(A)”] Pertaining To Assessment Years (“Ays”) 2011-12 & 2012-13. Since The Issue(S) Involved Are Identical, These Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order.

For Appellant: Shri C.H. Naniwadekar &For Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 11Section 2(15)

charitable but commercial in nature and denied the assessee’s claim of exemption by applying the amended provisions of section 2(15) of the Act which has been upheld by the Ld. CIT(A). Before us, the Ld. AR has contended that the issue pertaining to cancellation of registration of the assessee trust u/s 12A of the Act is pending

KAILASWASI NARAYAN ALIAS BAPU PATIL SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL,KOLHAPUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(2), KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 620/PUN/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune11 Mar 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: CA Supriya PowarFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 3Section 68

natural justice. His decision has not legal sanctity. The appeal order is not sustainable. Both the orders be quashed and set aside granting relief to the assessee. 5. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law and in the alternative, if it is presumed that the trust is not registered u/s 12A, then in that

DAR E AQRAM EDUCTAION CHARITABLE TRUST,PUNE vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD 1(2), PUNE

In the result, both the appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 739/PUN/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 Jul 2025AY 2023-24
For Appellant: \nShri Piyush BafnaFor Respondent: \nShri Amol Khairnar
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 36ASection 80G

charitable trust's\nregistration.\nImproper Interpretation of Section 12AB Requirements\n6. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble\nCIT(Exemption), Pune has misinterpreted the provisions of Section 12AB of\nthe Income Tax Act, 1961 and has erroneously concluded that the trust\ndoes not meet the requirements for registration.\nDenial of Natural Justice

DAR E ARQAM EDUCATION CHARITABLE TRUST,PUNE vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD 1(2), PUNE

In the result, both the appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 738/PUN/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 Jul 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Piyush BafnaFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 36ASection 80G

charitable trust's registration. Improper Interpretation of Section 12AB Requirements 6. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble CIT(Exemption), Pune has misinterpreted the provisions of section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and has erroneously concluded that the trust does not meet the requirements for registration. Denial of Natural Justice

KALYANI GORAKSHAN TRUST,SATARA, MAHARASHTRA vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE, MAHARASHTRA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 559/PUN/2025[2025-2026]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Nov 2025AY 2025-2026

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri C.H. NaniwadekarFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 80GSection 80G(5)

charitable nature and genuineness of the activities of the trust (pages 40-96 of the Paper Book refers). He therefore submitted that the assessee is in a position to make further submissions before the Ld. CIT(E) as 4 desired by him to his satisfaction. He accordingly submitted that in the interest of justice

OUR LADY OF HOPE CHURCH,THANE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1239/PUN/2023[--]Status: DisposedITAT Pune11 Mar 2024

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteour Lady Of Hope Church, Vs Cit (Exemption), Pune. Ghormal, Naglai Bunder, Thane, Maharashtra Pan: Aaato 1231 B Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Mahendra Gohel, Ca Revenue By : Shri Keyur Patel, Dr Date Of Hearing : 11/03/2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 11/03/2024 Order Per Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm: This Appeal Preferred By The Assessee Emanates From The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax [Exemption], Pune (For Short, „Cit(E)‟), Dated 27.09.2023 As Per The Following Grounds Of Appeal:-

For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gohel, CAFor Respondent: Shri Keyur Patel, DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

charitable activities performed by the trust as per his satisfaction and whether also the trust is abiding by the laws in force at the relevant point of time. The applicant trust is also directed to file all the relevant documents/evidences as and would be called for by the office of ld.CIT(E) and this being the final opportunity given

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1153/MUM/2016[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

Trust Act, 1963. We have also gone through the various judicial decisions relied on by the assessee and are of the view that the issue raised in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by these decisions. Accordingly, we conclude that the activities carried on by the assessee are of charitable nature and come within the definition

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 544/PUN/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

Trust Act, 1963. We have also gone through the various judicial decisions relied on by the assessee and are of the view that the issue raised in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by these decisions. Accordingly, we conclude that the activities carried on by the assessee are of charitable nature and come within the definition

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 543/PUN/2016[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

Trust Act, 1963. We have also gone through the various judicial decisions relied on by the assessee and are of the view that the issue raised in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by these decisions. Accordingly, we conclude that the activities carried on by the assessee are of charitable nature and come within the definition

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1154/MUM/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

Trust Act, 1963. We have also gone through the various judicial decisions relied on by the assessee and are of the view that the issue raised in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by these decisions. Accordingly, we conclude that the activities carried on by the assessee are of charitable nature and come within the definition

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1155/MUM/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

Trust Act, 1963. We have also gone through the various judicial decisions relied on by the assessee and are of the view that the issue raised in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by these decisions. Accordingly, we conclude that the activities carried on by the assessee are of charitable nature and come within the definition

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 545/PUN/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

Trust Act, 1963. We have also gone through the various judicial decisions relied on by the assessee and are of the view that the issue raised in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by these decisions. Accordingly, we conclude that the activities carried on by the assessee are of charitable nature and come within the definition

SHRI GORAKSHAN SANSTHA UDGIR,UDGIR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 265/PUN/2025[202223]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Bharat ShahFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G

Natural Justice. The Appellant is a Charitable Trust engaged cows are being taken care of. Because of cancellation of registration

SHRI GORAKSHAN SANSTHA UDGIR,UDGIR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 264/PUN/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 Jul 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Bharat ShahFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G

Natural Justice. The Appellant is a Charitable Trust engaged cows are being taken care of. Because of cancellation of registration

GERIATRIC WELLNESS FOUNDATION,PUNE vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1346/PUN/2023[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Jun 2024AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri S.S. Godarageriatric Wellness Foundation Cit (Exemption), Pune Lokmanya Hospital, Mitramandal Vs. 484/6, Mitramandal Colony, Parvati, Pune – 411009 Pan : Aafcg8051M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Rajendra Agiwal Department By : Shri Keyur Patel, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 24-04-2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 12-06-2024 O R D E R Per R. K. Panda, Vp :

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra AgiwalFor Respondent: Shri Keyur Patel, CIT-DR
Section 12A

nature. Finally, he submitted that given an opportunity, the assessee is in a position to substantiate its case before the CIT(Exemption) by clarifying whatever doubts he has for allowing the registration u/s 12AA of the Act. 6. The Ld. DR on the other hand, heavily relied on the order of CIT(Exemption) and also filed a paper book containing

RAJARSHI SHAHU SHIKSHAN SANSTHA INAM DHAMANI,SANGLI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the appellant is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1024/PUN/2023[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Apr 2025

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari
Section 10Section 115BSection 119Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)Section 12A(2)

charitable activity under the Income-tax Act. Further, ld. PCIT has not disputed the genuineness of the trust activities or its commitment to public welfare and as such the approach disregarding the substantive nature of the trust operations and its contribution to society. It is settled legal principle that procedural lapse should not override the substantive justice