BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “charitable trust”+ Demonetizationclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur20Chandigarh12Chennai10Amritsar7Mumbai7Delhi7Indore7Hyderabad6Kolkata5Pune5Bangalore4Ahmedabad4Lucknow3Visakhapatnam2Guwahati1Cuttack1Dehradun1Agra1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 115B8Addition to Income5Section 143(3)4Section 684Cash Deposit4Demonetization4Charitable Trust4Exemption4Section 69A3Section 142(1)

GUNAI SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL,UDGIR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, AURANGABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1421/PUN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI R. K. PANDA (Vice President), SHRI VINAY BHAMORE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Tanaji Chavan
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 68

charitable trust with main object of running educational institution and has filed the return of income for the year under consideration on 31.03.2018 declaring income as Nil. Subsequently, the case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny and accordingly, statutory notices issued to the assessee in order to verify the anonymous donations received by the assessee and also to verify

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS CIRCLE, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD. vs. GUNAI SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL, LATUR

3
Section 1443
Section 2632

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1370/PUN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI R. K. PANDA (Vice President), SHRI VINAY BHAMORE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Tanaji Chavan
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 68

charitable trust with main object of running educational institution and has filed the return of income for the year under consideration on 31.03.2018 declaring income as Nil. Subsequently, the case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny and accordingly, statutory notices issued to the assessee in order to verify the anonymous donations received by the assessee and also to verify

SHRI SEVAGIRI MAHARAJ DEOSTHAN,SATARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - EXEMPTION WARD 1(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1348/PUN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad

For Appellant: Shri Kaushal JainFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Dhivare
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250

charitable trust and on the basis of information about cash deposits in Specified Bank Notes (SBNs) during the demonetization period

VASANTARAO SANAS EDUCATION SOCIETY,PUNE vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD 1(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 346/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa KhareFor Respondent: Shri Sourabh Nayak
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 69A

charitable trust carrying activities of school, sports and other activities registered on 19.12.2000. As per the information on Actionable Information Monitoring System (AIMS) of the Department, the assessee had made cash deposits of specified bank notes worth Rs.14,00,000/- in its bank account in Wadgaon Dhayari branch of Jijamata Mahila Sahakari Bank during the demonetization

SONAL SANDEEP SATAV,PUNE vs. PCIT, PUNE-2, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 945/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Astha Chandra & Shree G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Sarang GudhateFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

Charitable Trust (1987) 167 ITR 129 (Raj.). 5.1 Several other decisions have been relied upon by the assessee in the written submissions filed before us. 6. The Ld. DR referred to the relevant paras of the assessment order and pointed out that the Ld. AO has passed the assessment order without carrying out necessary enquiry/verification in relation to the issues