DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALGAON vs. TARADEVI RATANLAL BAFNA, JALGAON

survey on assessee. On revenue's appeal, High Court confirmed\norder of Tribunal. The SLP filed by the Department was dismissed by Hon'ble\nSupreme Court holding that there was no reason to interfere with the order passed by\nHigh Court.\n\n8.8 Among others, the appellant placed his reliance on the decision of Hon'ble\nJurisdictional Bombay High Court

DINESHKUMAR RAMCHANDRA TULSYAN (HUF),,NASHIK vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(5),, NASHIK

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2014-15 Dineshkumar Ramchandra Tulsyan (Huf) Ito, Ward 1(5), 214B, Laxmi Niwas, Mahatma Nagar, Vs. Nashik Nashik – 422007 Pan: Aachd5953R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year : 2014-15 Smt. Sumandevi Dineshkumar Tulsyan Ito, Ward 1(5), 214B, Laxmi Niwas, Mahatma Nagar, Vs. Nashik Nashik – 422007 Pan: Ackpt1322Q (Appellant) (Respondent)

Capital Gains as the same were exempt. He noted that the Investigation Wing, Kolkata passed on the information to Investigation Wing Nashik, who conducted survey u/s 133A

SMT. SUMANDEVI DINESHKUMAR TULSYAN,,NASHIK vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(5),, NASHIK

Capital Gains as the same were exempt. He noted that the\nInvestigation Wing, Kolkata passed on the information to Investigation Wing\nNashik, who conducted survey u/s 133A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALGAON vs. SIDHARTH RATANLAL BAFNA, JALGAON

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

capital gain scam. He submitted that one such action was carried out in the case of M/s PFLIL, a Hyderabad based company on which survey u/s 133A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALGAON vs. TARADEVI RATANLAL BAFNA, JALGAON

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

capital gain scam. He submitted that one such action was carried out in the case of M/s PFLIL, a Hyderabad based company on which survey u/s 133A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALGAON vs. SIDHARTH RATANLAL BAFNA, JALGAON

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

capital gain scam. He submitted that one such action was carried out in the case of M/s PFLIL, a Hyderabad based company on which survey u/s 133A

RAVINDRA JOMA BHAGAT,,RAIGAD vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1,, PANVEL

In the result, the appeal by assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm

u/s 133A of the I.T. Act, 1961 was carried out at the business premises of M/s Apeksha Real Estate, Prop. Shri Ravindra Joma Bhagat situated at Shop No1, Stand View Building, behind S.J. Stand on 02.03.2010. The premises of the survey itself shows that the assessee was running real estate business. 7. In addition to the above, the bank statement

M/S. ARCH HYDRO POWER PROJECTS PVT.LTD,,KOLHAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1(1),, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury

capital gains. A survey action u/s 133A of the Income-tax Act 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) was conducted

RAMCHANDRAUDAYSINGHJADHAVRAO,PUNE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

survey action u/s 133A of the Act, the\nassessee would not have disclosed the above mentioned business income of Rs.79\nlakhs and long term capital gains

AMIT BHASKARRAO SANAP,,AURANGABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE -3, , AURANGABAD

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is Dismissed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.78/Pun/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Amit Bhaskarrao Sanap, The Assistant A-2, N-4, Cidco, Aurangabad, Vs Commissioner Of Income Maharashtra – 431001. Tax, Circle-3, Aurangabad. Pan: Auips 4177 L Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By None. Revenue By Shri S P Walimbe & Shri Arvind Desai – Dr Date Of Hearing 25/07/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 19/10/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-2, Aurangabad, Dated 13.11.2018 For The A.Y. 2015-16. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Order Of The Learned Commissioner (A), Aurangabad Confirming The Addition Of Rs.1,93.17.241/- Made By The A.O. In Computing The Income U/S 56 Instead Of Exempt U S. 10(38) Of The Act Of The Appellant Is Contrary To Law & Facts Of The Case.

survey U/s 133A of the Income Tax Act on the business premises of M/s. Oscar Remedies Pvt. Ltd. on 18.01.2006, the assessee who was admittedly a director, declared additional income of Rs.30 lakhs relatable to unaccounted investment towards construction of the premises of M/s Oscar Remedies Pvt. Ltd. This apart, the assessee declared additional amount of Rs.50 lakhs attributable

RAJARSHI SHAHU SHIKSHAN SANSTHA INAM DHAMANI,SANGLI vs. ITO EXEMPTION, KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1121 To 1126/Pun/2024 Assessment Years : 2012-13 To 2017-18

133A of the Act was conducted on six premises of the assessee on 13/02/2019. Summons was issued to various donors, President and accountant of the assessee. Many statements were recorded. Thereafter, Re-assessment proceedings u/s 147 were initiated against the appellant from AY 2012-13 to AY 2017-18. 4. The learned AO, while concluding the 147 assessments, held that

RAJARSHI SHAHU SHIKSHAN SANSTHA INAM DHAMANI,SANGLI vs. ITO EXEMPTION, KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1121 To 1126/Pun/2024 Assessment Years : 2012-13 To 2017-18

133A of the Act was conducted on six premises of the assessee on 13/02/2019. Summons was issued to various donors, President and accountant of the assessee. Many statements were recorded. Thereafter, Re-assessment proceedings u/s 147 were initiated against the appellant from AY 2012-13 to AY 2017-18. 4. The learned AO, while concluding the 147 assessments, held that

RAJARSHI SHAHU SHIKSHAN SANSTHA INAM DHAMANI,SANGLI vs. ITO EXEMPTION, KOLHAPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1121 To 1126/Pun/2024 Assessment Years : 2012-13 To 2017-18

133A of the Act was conducted on six premises of the assessee on 13/02/2019. Summons was issued to various donors, President and accountant of the assessee. Many statements were recorded. Thereafter, Re-assessment proceedings u/s 147 were initiated against the appellant from AY 2012-13 to AY 2017-18. 4. The learned AO, while concluding the 147 assessments, held that

RAJARSHI SHAHU SHIKSHAN SANSTHA INAM DHAMANI,SANGLI vs. ITO EXEMPTION , KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are\npartly allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

133A of the Act was conducted on six premises of the\nassessee on 13/02/2019. Summons was issued to various donors,\nPresident and accountant of the assessee. Many statements were\nrecorded. Thereafter, Re-assessment proceedings u/s 147 were\ninitiated against the appellant from AY 2012-13 to AY 2017-18.\n4. The learned AO, while concluding the 147 assessments, held that

RAJARSHI SHAHU SHIKSHAN SANSTHA INAM DHAMANI,SANGLI vs. ITO EXEMPTION, KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are\npartly allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

133A of the Act was conducted on six premises of the\nassessee on 13/02/2019. Summons was issued to various donors,\nPresident and accountant of the assessee. Many statements were\nrecorded. Thereafter, Re-assessment proceedings u/s 147 were\ninitiated against the appellant from AY 2012-13 to AY 2017-18.\n4. The learned AO, while concluding the 147 assessments, held that

RAJARSHI SHAHU SHIKSHAN SANSTHA INAM DHAMANI,SANGLI vs. ITO EXEMPTION, KOLHAPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are\npartly allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

133A of the Act was conducted on six premises of the\nassessee on 13/02/2019. Summons was issued to various donors,\nPresident and accountant of the assessee. Many statements were\nrecorded. Thereafter, Re-assessment proceedings u/s 147 were\ninitiated against the appellant from AY 2012-13 to AY 2017-18.\n4. The learned AO, while concluding the 147 assessments, held that

DCIT CIRCLE 1 NASHIK, NASHIK vs. SHREE SAI PROPERTIES, NASHIK

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

survey no. 367/3 at Makhmalabad, Nashik to members of the Kokani Family vide 11 separate agreements. It is seen that prior to the sale of these plots to Kokani Family, these were agreed to be sold to M/s Dhananjay Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Of Thakkar Group vide agreement dated 25.04.2013. However, on the request of Thakkar Group, the appellant cancelled

LALCHAND NARAYAN BHAKT,JALNA vs. ITO WARD 2, JALNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Justice (Retd.) C V Bhadang & Shri R. K. Pandaassessment Year : 2011-12

survey u/s 133A of the Act on 13.03.2015 in the case of Shri Santosh Karwa. According to the Assessing Officer the assessee has virtually handed over the property to Shri Santosh Karwa vide 11 Essar Pavti dated 18.02.2011 and received the amount of Rs.2 crore. He, therefore, invoking the provisions of section 2(47)(v) of the Act held that