BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “capital gains”+ Section 920clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai167Delhi80Bangalore22Jaipur17Chennai16Ahmedabad13Indore13Kolkata12Hyderabad12Lucknow12Pune6Ranchi6Dehradun4Nagpur3Cochin3Raipur2Rajkot2Jabalpur2Patna2Surat2Chandigarh1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)8Section 2636Section 36(1)(viia)6Section 1545Addition to Income5Section 684Section 573Section 103Section 143(2)3Deduction

RAMCHANDRAUDAYSINGHJADHAVRAO,PUNE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1399/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune24 Feb 2025AY 2016-17
Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 45(2)

920/-. The same was processed\nu/sec.143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short \"the Act\"). In this case a\nsurvey action u/sec.133A of the Act was conducted on 14.09.2016 at his business\npremises. The case of the assessee was selected for compulsory scrutiny. During\nthe course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer referred to the various\nquestions

MAGARAJ MISHRIMAL RATHI,PUNE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-5, PUNE, PUNE

3
Disallowance3
Exemption2

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 734/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI R. K. PANDA (Vice President), SHRI VINAY BHAMORE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Suhas P. Bora
Section 10Section 143(2)Section 144Section 154Section 68

capital 3 gains. The case was selected under scrutiny through CASS and accordingly notices u/s 143(2) and 142(1) were issued to the assessee through ITBA portal. Since the assessee did not responded, a final show cause notice was issued and due to non- compliance from the side of the assessee, the Assessing Officer proceeded to pass ex-parte

BHAKTI KISHOR GADA,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFCIER -3(5), PUNE

ITA 1021/PUN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri G. D. Padmahshali & Hon’Ble Shri Vinay Bhamoreassessment Year : 2014-15 Bhakti Kishor Gada 201, Sai Siddhi, Behind Congress Bhavan, Shivaji Nagar, Pune-411004. Pan: Aghpg4273A. . . . . . . . Appellant

For Appellant: None for the AssesseeFor Respondent: Mr BS Rajpurohit [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

920/- which was selected for scrutiny u/s 143(3) of the Act. The exemption u/s 10(38) of the Act claimed against the long term capital gain arising out of share/scrip transactions of ‘Conart Traders Ltd/Sunrise Asian Ltd.’ was treated as bogus/sham and consequently ₹31,88,889/- was added u/s 68 as unexplained cash credit and assessed the total income

BANK OF MAHARASHTRA ,PUNE vs. ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 259/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreassessment Year : 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri S Ananthan & Smt. Abarna CAFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)(via)Section 36(1)(viia)

capital nature, thus, these are not required to Mark to Market. Resultantly the loss or gain pertains to HTM category is not to be taken into consideration. The same will considered as and when these are transferred. (c) On the applicability of circulars instructions the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of "Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd vs CIT(supra

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), PUNE, PUNE vs. BANK OF MAHARASHTRA, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 428/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 Jan 2025AY 2016-17
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)(via)Section 36(1)(viia)

capital nature, thus, these are not required to Mark to Market. Resultantly the loss or gain pertains to HTM category is not to be taken into consideration. The same will considered as and when these are transferred.\n(c) On the applicability of circulars instructions the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of \"Catholic Syrian Bank

POKHARNA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PUNE vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1244/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Jun 2025AY 2020-21
Section 10Section 10(23)Section 10(230)(iad)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 263Section 57

gains\n3b\n0\nс.\nOther sources\n3c\n9360082\nd.\nu/s 115BBF\n3d\n0\ne.\nu/s 115BBG\n3e\n0\n4a\nProfit or loss included in 1, which is referred to in 4a\nsection\n0\n44AD/44ADA/44AE/44B/44BB/44BBA\n/44BBB/44D/44DA/44DB/First Schedule of Income-\ntax Act (other than profit from life insurance business\nreferred to in section 115B)\ni\n44AD\n4i\n0\n6\nBalance