MAHATMA GANDHI NAGRI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA MYDT UDGIR,LATUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER- WARD 1 -LATUR, LATUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

l) Whether the assessee, Totagar Co-operative Sale Society, Sirsi, is\nentitled to 100% deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax\nAct, 1961 (for short 'the Act') in respect of whole of its income by way\nof interest earned by it during the relevant Assessment Years from\n2007-2008 to 2011-2012 on the deposits or investments

MAHATMA GANDHI NAGRI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA MYDT UDGIR,LATUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER- WARD 1 -LATUR, LATUR

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

l) Whether the asses see, Totagar Co-operative Sale Society, Sirsi, is entitled to 100% deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') in respect of whole of its income by way of interest earned by it during the relevant Assessment Years from 2007-2008 to 2011-2012 on the deposits

DIVYADATTA DIGAMBER NAGARI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA LIMITED SATARA,KOREGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SATARA

The appeal of the assessee is ALLOWED in above terms

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri G. D. Padmahshali & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No. 651/Pun/2024 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Divyadatta Digamber Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Moti Heights, Azaad Chowk, New St-Stand, Koregaon, Satara-415501 Pan: Aaeas1871L . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant

section 154 of the Act. Tb_ ‘0’ `caur_ o` ]l[cm eventually appearing in the return of income instead of ₹30,85,941/- either on account of system glitches or owing to transcriptional error, is bare-faced, blatant & apparent on record when verified with COI/SOI whose discovery requires/triggers no long driven investigation hence is very much rectifiable

VITA URBAN CREDIT CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD.,,SANGLI vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,,

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.2390/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-13

80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act on account of bank interest earned by the assessee. The said issue is not disputed before the Tribunal. The second issue which was adjudicated by the Assessing Officer was regarding taxation of income earned under the head ‘capital gains’. The Assessing Officer vide para 6 notes that as per CIB information

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, SATARA vs. THE KARAD URBAN CO. OP. BANK LTD KARAD, KARAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

Capital Local Area Bank Ltd. vs. ACIT Jalandhar 82 taxmann.com 387 (Amritsar ITAT) 4. Yes Bank vs. ACIT 88 taxnmann.com 431 (Mumbai ITAT) 5. Caylon Bank vs. DCIT 31 taxmann.com 231 (Mumbai ITAT) 6. ACIT vs. Chatrapati Rajeshri Sahu Urban Co-op Bank Ltd. IT Appeal No. 798 of 2011 (ITAT- Pune) I have considered the assessment order