BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “capital gains”+ Section 80Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai48Delhi33Jaipur31Ahmedabad16Chennai14Bangalore13Chandigarh12Lucknow10Indore7Hyderabad6Pune6Kolkata6Varanasi5Raipur5Surat5Telangana5Nagpur3Cochin2Amritsar2SC2Karnataka1Jodhpur1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 80I13Section 270A8Deduction6Section 1474Section 1483Section 80C3Addition to Income3Section 80A(1)2Section 80A2Section 80B(5)

VIJAYSINGH J JADHAVRAO,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(5),, PUNE

Appeal is dismissed in above terms

ITA 2245/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteshri Vijaysingh Jaysingh The Income Tax Officer - 2(5) Jadhavrao Pmt Building Shivajinagar Vs. Swargate, Pune 411037 Jangali Maharaj Road Pune 411005 Pan – Aaqpj3021L Appellant Respondent Appellant By: Shri Hari Krishan Respondent By: Shri S.P. Walimbe Date Of Hearing: 29.04.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 06.05.2022 O R D E R Per S.S. Godara, Jm This Assessee’S Appeal For Ay 2012-13 Is Against The Cit(A)-3, Pune’S Order Dated 28.07.2017 Passed In Case No. Cit (A), Pune-3/10424/2015-16 Involving Proceedings Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short The Act).

For Appellant: Shri Hari KrishanFor Respondent: Shri S.P. Walimbe
Section 143(3)Section 80I

80C of the Act having overriding effect over all general provisions. We accordingly reject the assessee’s foregoing arguments to hold that its impugned Section 80IB(10) deduction is not allowable in law. 5. Next comes assessee’s latter stand that its income derived from the foregoing housing project ought to be assessed under the head capital gains

2
Limitation/Time-bar2
Set Off of Losses2

MR. GIRISH KISANDAS MEHTA,PUNE vs. ITO WARD 9 (3), PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1259/PUN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1259/Pun/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Mr. Girish Kisandas Mehta, Vs. Ito, Ward-9(3), Pune. Mehta Niwas Bhairavnath Nagar, Kusgaon, Lonavala, Maval, Pune- 410401. Pan : Akepm3983A Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Bhuvanesh Kankani Revenue By Smt. N. C. Shilpa : Date Of Hearing : 17.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 29.12.2025 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 17.03.2025 Passed By Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac For The Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. The Appellant Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1. On The Facts & Circumstances Prevailing In The Case & As Per Provisions & Scheme Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 ('The Act') It Be Held That The Assessment Proceedings Initiated U/S 147 Of The Act Are Invalid Since The Requisite Approval/Sanction U/S 151(Ii) Of The Act Is Not Taken. Accordingly, The Assessment Proceedings So Initiated Be Kindly Annulled & Appellant Be Granted Just & Proper Relief In This Respect.

For Appellant: Shri Bhuvanesh Kankani
Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 2(14)Section 80C

section 2(14) of the IT Act, therefore does not attract any capital gain liable to income tax. Not being satisfied with the reply of the assessee, the Assessing Officer completed the assessment proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B of the IT Act and vide assessment order dated 29-02-2024 determined income at Rs.61,10,925/- as against the income

M/S. CHHEDA ELECTRICALS AND ELECTRONICS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1(1),, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals are dismissed

ITA 400/PUN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury

Section 80ASection 80A(1)Section 80A(2)Section 80B(5)Section 80I

80C to 80U”. Sub-section (2) of section 80A provides that: “The aggregate amount of the deductions under this Chapter shall not, in any case, exceed the gross total income of the assessee”. The term “gross total income” has been defined in section 80B(5) to M/s. Chheda Electricals and Electronics Pvt. Ltd., mean: ‘the total income computed in accordance

M/S. CHHEDA ELECTRICALS AND ELECTRONICS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(3),, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals are dismissed

ITA 668/PUN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 May 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury

Section 80ASection 80A(1)Section 80A(2)Section 80B(5)Section 80I

80C to 80U”. Sub-section (2) of section 80A provides that: “The aggregate amount of the deductions under this Chapter shall not, in any case, exceed the gross total income of the assessee”. The term “gross total income” has been defined in section 80B(5) to M/s. Chheda Electricals and Electronics Pvt. Ltd., mean: ‘the total income computed in accordance

ABDUL MAJID JAINUDDIN CHIKATE,DAPOLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, RATNAGIRI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1455/PUN/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Jul 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Deepak Kumar Kedia
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 2(14)Section 250Section 80C

Gains on the sale of agricultural lands. The appellant submits that the land being an agricultural land not falling in the definition of 'capital asset in terms of the provisions of section 2(14), the addition is not warranted. The appellant prays that the ITO be directed to delete the addition. 2 Abdul Majid Jainuddin Chikate

UDAY UTTAMRAO NEVASE,PUNE vs. THE ASSESSING OFFICER / ASSESSMENT UNIT, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 2606/PUN/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Feb 2026AY 2022-23

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No.2606/Pun/2025 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2022-23 Uday Uttamrao Nevase, V The Assessing Officer / Saugandh Niwas, Hind Colony S Assessment Unit, Pune. Lane No.1 A, Bhekrai Nagar, Phursungi, Pune – 412308. Pan: Akqpn1150Q Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Ca Rohan Gupta Revenue By Shri Harshit Bari – Addl.Cit(Virtual) Date Of Hearing 16/12/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 10/02/2026 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeal)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For The A.Y.2022-23 Dated 04.09.2025 Emanating From The Penalty Order Passed Under Section 270A, Dated 17.09.2024. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal : “Ground 1 Section 270Aa Immunity Cit A Erred In Law By Confirming The Penalty Of Rs 629382 Under Section 270A Without Considering And

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 270A

80C 150000 80CCD(1B) 50000 80D 50000 4 80TTA 10000 ITA No.2606/PUN/2025 [A] 80DD 75000 80CCD(2) 100000 80DDB 90000 80E 400000 80EEA 150000 80EEB 150000 80GGC 100000 4.2 Out of the above deductions claimed in the Return of Income, for following deductions Assessee could not file any documentary evidence and during the video conference assessee submitted that the claim