BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “capital gains”+ Section 292Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi82Bangalore60Mumbai33Jaipur26Chennai15Kolkata13Nagpur11Ahmedabad7Hyderabad6Pune6Lucknow5Visakhapatnam5Patna5Indore5Raipur3Amritsar2Cochin2Chandigarh2Dehradun2Allahabad1Calcutta1Rajkot1SC1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 2638Addition to Income6Section 143(3)4Section 10(38)3Section 693Section 153A3Section 112A2Section 682Section 1472Disallowance

LIQUIDHUB ANALYTICS PVT. LTD. (NOW MERGED WITH CAPGEMINI TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INDIA LTD),PUNE vs. NFAC, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1952/PUN/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Mar 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreassessment Year : 2020-21

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Smt Nilu Jaggi, CIT
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)

capital gains amounting to INR 3,26,81,816 at an incorrect rate of 25% instead of 20% under section 112 of the Act and has consequently computed incorrect tax liability 7. The Lid AO has erred in computing the tax liability on income earned by the Appellant from business operations and other sources by applying at an incorrect base

SHIVENDRA NAGOJIRAO PATANKAR,(HUF),,KOLHAPUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(2),, KOLHAPUR

2

In the result, both the appeal of the assessee as well as the Cross

ITA 260/PUN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Sept 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.260/Pun/2018 िनधा!रण वष! / Assessment Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri M.K. KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Ghei
Section 234BSection 68Section 69

292B of the Act, specially when there was no mistake committed by the AO in his assessment order while invoking provisions of section 68 of the Act? 4. The appellant craves leaves to add, alter, amend, modify any of the grounds or raise any other ground at the time of proceedings before the Hon'ble High Court which may please

ANIL BANSILAL LODHA,NASHIK vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NASHIK - 1, NASHIK

In the result, it is directed that the order passed under section 263 be set aside

ITA 953/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 10(38)Section 112ASection 143(3)Section 263

capital gain was to be taxed u/s. 112A of the Act, particularly when the exemption u/s. 10(38) was withdrawn from the next assessment year and the provisions of section 112A were inserted from next assessment year. 4. On the basis of the facts, in the circumstances of the case and as per law, the order passed by the Principal

BVG INDIA LIMITED,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 516/PUN/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 Oct 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta & Sneha M. PadhiarFor Respondent: S/Shri Ajay Kumar Kesari & Abdhesh Kumar
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 153ASection 153D

292B of the Act, is untenable, having regard to the phraseology used in paragraph 4 of the 2019 Circular. 19. The object and purpose of the issuance of the 2019 Circular, as indicated hereinabove, inter alia, was to create an audit trail. Therefore, the communication relating to assessments, appeals, orders, etcetera which find mention in paragraph

INCOME-TAX OFFICER vs. SMT. SUSHILABAI K. SANKLECHA,, NASHIK

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1972/PUN/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 May 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Garg
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 292B

section 292B of the Income-tax Act-1961? 3. The appellant prays leave to add, alter, clarify, amend or to withdraw any grounds of appeal as and when the occasion demands.” 3 CO No. 01/PUN/2017 A.Y.2008-09 3. Briefly stated relevant facts include that the assessee has filed return of income on 06.03.2009 declaring total income at Rs.2

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, SATARA vs. THE KARAD URBAN CO. OP. BANK LTD KARAD, KARAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1564/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 Mar 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Mr. Deepak ChintamanFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar –
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 37

gains and losses across all performing investments held under the AFS have to be aggregated and net appreciation or depreciation shall be directly credited or debited to a reserve named AFS Reserve, the same shall not be routed the Profit & Loss Account. 5. The appellant craves leave to add to, amend, alter any of the above grounds of appeal