MRS BALBIR KAUR BIRDIE ,MADHYA PRADESH vs. ITO 11(3), PUNE
In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed
ITA 1466/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Jan 2025AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore
For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 264Section 271(1)(b)
capital gain, the
assessee filed a revision petition u/sec.264 of the Act before
the PCIT. The PCIT considered the said petition of the assessee
and set aside the order passed u/sec.143(3) of the Act to the
file of Assessing Officer to compute the income as per the
provisions of law. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer issued
two notices u/sec.142(1