BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “capital gains”+ Section 271Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur14Ahmedabad14Mumbai12Amritsar10Bangalore9Surat8Delhi6Lucknow6Pune5Cuttack4Indore3Hyderabad2Chandigarh2Visakhapatnam1Jodhpur1Patna1Raipur1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 14811Section 143(3)5Penalty4Addition to Income4Section 271(1)(b)3Section 142(1)3Section 1443Section 270A3Section 2503Section 249(4)

MRS BALBIR KAUR BIRDIE ,MADHYA PRADESH vs. ITO 11(3), PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 1466/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune14 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 264Section 271(1)(b)

capital gain, the assessee filed a revision petition u/sec.264 of the Act before the PCIT. The PCIT considered the said petition of the assessee and set aside the order passed u/sec.143(3) of the Act to the file of Assessing Officer to compute the income as per the provisions of law. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer issued two notices u/sec.142

3

RAMESHWARDAS SHIVCHARANDAS AND COMPANY ,NANDED vs. ITO WARD 1, JALNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 524/PUN/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune07 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.524/Pun/2025 Assessment Year : 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra AgiwalFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh B Budruk
Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 282

section 45(5A) have been inserted by Finance Act, 2017 w.e.f. 01.04.2018. The said provisions even otherwise are not applicable for AY 2015-16 i.e. impugned assessment year. Erred in not allowing any deduction while computing long-term capital gain 10.On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Ld. AO erred in not granting any deduction

JAYVANTI JANARDAN BHANUSKAR,RAIGAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 890/PUN/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Aug 2025AY 2013-14
For Appellant: \nDepartment by
Section 271(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)

271F shall be dropped\".\nThe appellant contends that on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and\nin law, the CIT(A) ought to have disposed of the aforesaid grounds of appeal on\nmerits.\nThe appellant craves leave to add to, alter or amend the aforestated grounds of\nappeal.\"\n4. Briefly stated the facts are that the assessee

KALPANA SUBRAMANIAM,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 13(1), PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 514/PUN/2025[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Apr 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.514/Pun/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17 Kalpana Subramaniam, V The Income Tax Officer, 19A, B/H Regene Park, Ganpati S Ward-13(1), Pune. Chowk, Lunkad Towers, Pune – 411014. Maharashtra. Pan: Aswps7131C Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Akashay Surana (Virtual Hearing) Revenue By Shri Harish Bist – Addl.Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 02/04/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 23/04/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: Thisappeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; Dated 28.12.2024For Assessment Year 2016-17. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal : “1. The Order Passed Under Section 250 Of The Act By Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal

Section 148Section 148ASection 249(4)Section 249(4)(b)Section 250Section 250oSection 271(1)(c)

capital gains of Rs. 29,46,791/- by taking the incorrect purchase value of Rs.28,71,496/- and incorrect sale value of Rs.58,18,287/-. 7. The Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the AO has erred in reopening the assessment u/s. 148 of the Act. 8. The Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the notice

FARUK RAFIK MUJAWAR,ICHALKARANJI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ICHALKARANJI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1344/PUN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI MANISH BORAD (Accountant Member), SHRI VINAY BHAMORE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Uodol Raj Singh
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 194HSection 270ASection 270A(9)Section 274Section 44A

gain from sale of immovable property and business income of Rs.6,53,339/-. The assessee also furnished audited balance sheet, profit & loss account and audit report in Form 3CB & 3CD duly certified by a Chartered Accountant, this audit report was duly uploaded on income tax portal on 31.10.2018. After considering the submissions of the assessee, the Assessing Officer completed