BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “capital gains”+ Section 271Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai18Jaipur16Delhi15Ahmedabad9Kolkata8Pune8Chennai7Lucknow5Indore4Rajkot3Bangalore2SC2Patna1Jodhpur1Dehradun1Surat1Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 271B41Section 44A20Penalty8Business Income6Addition to Income6Section 1325Section 1445Section 139(1)5Capital Gains5Unexplained Investment

BENCHMARRK REALTY LLP,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 8,, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is Dismissed

ITA 1396/PUN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.1396/Pun/2019 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Benchmarrk Realty Llp, The Dcit, Circle-8, Pune. Sr.No.17/19, Near Balaji V Temple, Kate Wasti, Punawale, S Pune – 411033. Pan: Aanfb 7064 Q Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Kishor B Phadke – Ar Revenue By Shri Ramnath P Murkunde – Dr Date Of Hearing 09/12/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 22/12/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-6, Pune Dated 25.07.2019 Emanating From Order Of Assessing Officer Dated 22.03.2018 Under Section 271B Of The Act, 1961 For The A.Y.2015- 16. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

Section 271BSection 273BSection 44A

271B. If any person fails to get his accounts audited in respect of any previous year or years relevant to an assessment year or furnish a report of such audit as required under section 44AB, the Assessing Officer may direct that such person shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum equal to one-half per cent of the total

5
Cash Deposit5
Search & Seizure5

LALIT SAKALCHAND GANDHI,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE ,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1300/PUN/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Aug 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 144Section 271BSection 44A

capital gain not in the business income. Section 44AB of the Act provides mandatory audit of books of accounts and threshold monetary limit for the year under consideration i.e. A.Y. 2007-08 is Rs.40 lacs. The said provision explains that every person carrying on business if the turnover or gross receipts in business exceeds Rs.40 lacs is mandatorily

LALIT SAKALCHAND GANDHI,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE ,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1304/PUN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Aug 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 144Section 271BSection 44A

capital gain not in the business income. Section 44AB of the Act provides mandatory audit of books of accounts and threshold monetary limit for the year under consideration i.e. A.Y. 2007-08 is Rs.40 lacs. The said provision explains that every person carrying on business if the turnover or gross receipts in business exceeds Rs.40 lacs is mandatorily

LALIT SAKALCHAND GANDHI,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE ,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1301/PUN/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 144Section 271BSection 44A

capital gain not in the business income. Section 44AB of the Act provides mandatory audit of books of accounts and threshold monetary limit for the year under consideration i.e. A.Y. 2007-08 is Rs.40 lacs. The said provision explains that every person carrying on business if the turnover or gross receipts in business exceeds Rs.40 lacs is mandatorily

LALIT SAKALCHAND GANDHI,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE ,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1302/PUN/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Aug 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 144Section 271BSection 44A

capital gain not in the business income. Section 44AB of the Act provides mandatory audit of books of accounts and threshold monetary limit for the year under consideration i.e. A.Y. 2007-08 is Rs.40 lacs. The said provision explains that every person carrying on business if the turnover or gross receipts in business exceeds Rs.40 lacs is mandatorily

LALIT SAKALCHAND GANDHI,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE ,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1303/PUN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Aug 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 144Section 271BSection 44A

capital gain not in the business income. Section 44AB of the Act provides mandatory audit of books of accounts and threshold monetary limit for the year under consideration i.e. A.Y. 2007-08 is Rs.40 lacs. The said provision explains that every person carrying on business if the turnover or gross receipts in business exceeds Rs.40 lacs is mandatorily

DILIP SHANTILAL SOLANKI,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 8,, PUN

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 1134/PUN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपीलसं. / Ita No.1134/Pun/2018 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Dilip Shantilal Solanki, The Dy.Commissioner Of 204, 2Nd Floor, Vishnu Bhawan, Vs Income-Tax, Circle-8, Pune. Budhwar Peth, Pune – 411002. . Pan: Aegps 2593 Q Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By None. Revenue By Shri S P Walimbe – Dr Date Of Hearing 08/08/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 29/08/2022 आदेश/ Order Per S.S.Godara, Jm: This Assessee’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2013-14 Is Directed Against The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-8, Pune’S Order Dated 28.09.2017 Passed In Case No.Pn/Cit(A)-8/Dcit Cir-8/808/2017-18/227, In Proceedings U/S.271B Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [In Short “The Act”].

Section 271B

section 271B penalty of Rs.1,50,000/- for not getting ITA No.1134/PUN/2018 for A.Y. 2013-14 Dilip S.Solanki (A) his books audited, we note that the CIT(A) detailed discussion affirming the same reads as follows: “5. In Ground No.1 the appellant has challenged the penalty of Rs.1,50,000/- imposed by the AO u/s.271B

DR. SMT. RANJANA S.NARGOLKAR,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 11(2),, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1799/PUN/2017[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Pune13 Feb 2020AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Laliet Kumar, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1799/Pun/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2003-04 Dr. Smt. Ranjana S. Nargolkar, ‘Reinessance’ 1St Floor, 1227, Jangalimaharaj Road, Pune-411004. .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant Pan : Aanpn9164D बनाम / V/S. Ito, Ward-11(2), ……""यथ" / Respondent Pune. Assessee By : Shri P. S. Shingte Revenue By : Shri Vijay Netke सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 11.02.2020 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 13.02.2020 आदेश / Order Per D. Karunakara Rao, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Order Of The Cit(A)-1, Pune Dated 30.06.2017 For The Assessment Year 2003-04. 2. The Effective Ground Raised By The Assessee Is As Under :- “1. The Learned Cit(A) Erred In Law & On Facts In Confirming The Penalty Of Rs.16376/- Levied By The A.O. U/S 271B Of The Income Tax Act, 1961.”

For Appellant: Shri P. S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Netke
Section 147Section 271BSection 44A

capital gain on transfer of development rights of the property. Further, the Assessing Officer noted that the assessee’s accounts are not audited despite the eligible turnover of professional receipts. No audit report is submitted. Therefore, the Assessing Officer initiated the penalty proceedings and issued the notice u/s 271B of the Act. In the penalty proceedings u/s 271B