DR. SMT. RANJANA S.NARGOLKAR,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 11(2),, PUNE
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed
ITA 1799/PUN/2017[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Pune13 Feb 2020AY 2003-04
Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Laliet Kumar, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1799/Pun/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2003-04 Dr. Smt. Ranjana S. Nargolkar, ‘Reinessance’ 1St Floor, 1227, Jangalimaharaj Road, Pune-411004. .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant Pan : Aanpn9164D बनाम / V/S. Ito, Ward-11(2), ……""यथ" / Respondent Pune. Assessee By : Shri P. S. Shingte Revenue By : Shri Vijay Netke सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 11.02.2020 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 13.02.2020 आदेश / Order Per D. Karunakara Rao, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Order Of The Cit(A)-1, Pune Dated 30.06.2017 For The Assessment Year 2003-04. 2. The Effective Ground Raised By The Assessee Is As Under :- “1. The Learned Cit(A) Erred In Law & On Facts In Confirming The Penalty Of Rs.16376/- Levied By The A.O. U/S 271B Of The Income Tax Act, 1961.”
For Appellant: Shri P. S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Netke
Section 147Section 271BSection 44A
capital gain on transfer of development rights of the property. Further, the Assessing Officer noted that the assessee’s accounts are not audited despite the eligible turnover of professional receipts. No audit report is submitted. Therefore, the Assessing
Officer initiated the penalty proceedings and issued the notice u/s 271B of the Act. In the penalty proceedings u/s 271B