BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 244Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai157Delhi91Jaipur31Bangalore26Ahmedabad25Cochin21Kolkata15Chandigarh8Visakhapatnam5Dehradun5Hyderabad5Chennai4Indore4Pune4Lucknow3Karnataka3Rajkot2Cuttack1Guwahati1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 115J9Section 143(3)4Addition to Income3Section 802Cash Deposit2

QUBIX BUSINESS PARK PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-8, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, Ground No.2 of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1994/PUN/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Jan 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: DR.DIPAK P. RIPOTE (Accountant Member), SHRI VINAY BHAMORE (Judicial Member)

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 144BSection 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 80

capital gains earned during the subject year 8. Erroneous levy of interest under section 234A of the Act The NFAC / Ld.AO erred in levying interest under section 234A of the Act, despite the Appellant filing its return of income within the prescribed due date. 9. Erroneous levy of interest under section 234B and 234C of the Act The NFAC / Ld.AO

POPATLAL MOHANLAL CHORDIA,,AURANGABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed on technicalities

ITA 781/PUN/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 781/Pun/2016 िनधा$रण वष$ / Assessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri Sunil GanooFor Respondent: Shri Sudhendu Das
Section 271Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 50C

244A, as per Act. Issue penalty show cause notice u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.” 7.1 In Para Nos. 8.4 and 8.5 of his order, the AO while making additions on account of capital gains recorded the following satisfaction : “8.4 I therefore add Rs.27,20,215/- being capital gains on sale of land

SURENDRA BHIMSEN AGARWAL,PUNE vs. ASST. CIT, CIRCLE-8, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 637/PUN/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 Sept 2019AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Shri Neelesh KhandelwalFor Respondent: Shri N. Ashok Babu
Section 143(3)

gains on account of Wakad land and Ravet land and on account of interest expenditure. Further, in the case of Nitin B. Agarwal, the Assessing Officer did 9. not make any addition on account of expenditure/investments. Further, the Assessing Officer made addition on account of cash deposits in SB Account in bank account which is the second reason for CASS

NITIN BHIMSEN AGARWAL,PUNE vs. ITO, WARD 9(1), PUNE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 638/PUN/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 Sept 2019AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Shri Neelesh KhandelwalFor Respondent: Shri N. Ashok Babu
Section 143(3)

gains on account of Wakad land and Ravet land and on account of interest expenditure. Further, in the case of Nitin B. Agarwal, the Assessing Officer did 9. not make any addition on account of expenditure/investments. Further, the Assessing Officer made addition on account of cash deposits in SB Account in bank account which is the second reason for CASS