LAXMAN BHAU PAWALE,AT POST PIRANGUT MUKAIWADI PUNE vs. ITO WARD 2.4 RANGE CODE 53, PUNE SWARGET
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 1541/PUN/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Dec 2025AY 2015-16
Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2015-16 Laxman Bhau Pawale Ito, Ward 2.4, Range At Post Mukaiwadi Code 53, Pune Vs. Pirangut Taluka Mulshi, Pune – 412115 Pan: Bzlpp3421M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Dinesh Sudam Kudale Department By : Shri Rajesh Gawali, Addl.Cit Date Of Hearing : 10-12-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 12-12-2025 O R D E R Per R.K. Panda, Vp:
For Appellant: Shri Dinesh Sudam KudaleFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Gawali, Addl.CIT
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148
1) of the Act which remained un-complied with. A show cause notice issued u/s 144 of the Act also remained un-complied with. The Assessing Officer thereafter completed the assessment u/s 144 of the Act and made addition of Rs.3,74,17,200/- as undisclosed capital gain.
4. Before the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC the assessee filed various details
