ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALGAON vs. SIDHARTH RATANLAL BAFNA, JALGAON

Assessing Officer has raised specific queries on the issue of long\nterm capital gain from sale of shares of NITSL and the assessee had replied to the\nsame, therefore, the reopening

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALGAON vs. TARADEVI RATANLAL BAFNA, JALGAON

Assessing Officer has raised specific queries on the issue of long\nterm capital gain from sale of shares of NITSL and the assessee had replied to the\nsame, therefore, the reopening

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALGAON vs. SIDHARTH RATANLAL BAFNA, JALGAON

Assessing Officer has raised specific queries on the issue of long\nterm capital gain from sale of shares of NITSL and the assessee had replied to the\nsame, therefore, the reopening

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, JALNA, JALNA vs. ATUL OMPRAKASH MANTRI, JALNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

reopening of the assessment, the Assessing Officer in a speaking order rejected the objections raised by the assessee and completed the assessment u/s 143(3) / 147 wherein he disallowed the claim of long term capital gain

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, JALNA, JALNA vs. ASHISH OMPRAKASH MANTRI, JALNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

reopening of the assessment, the Assessing Officer in a speaking order rejected the objections raised by the assessee and completed the assessment u/s 143(3) / 147 wherein he disallowed the claim of long term capital gain

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, JALNA, JALNA vs. OMPRAKASH ASARAM MANTRI, JALNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

reopening of the assessment, the Assessing Officer in a speaking order rejected the objections raised by the assessee and completed the assessment u/s 143(3) / 147 wherein he disallowed the claim of long term capital gain

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, JALNA, JALNA vs. PRAMILA OMPRAKASH MANTRI, JALNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

reopening of the assessment, the Assessing Officer in a speaking order rejected the objections raised by the assessee and completed the assessment u/s 143(3) / 147 wherein he disallowed the claim of long term capital gain

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, JALNA, JALNA vs. OMPRAKASH ASARAM MANTRI, JALNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

reopening of the assessment, the Assessing Officer in a speaking order rejected the objections raised by the assessee and completed the assessment u/s 143(3) / 147 wherein he disallowed the claim of long term capital gain

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1, JALNA, JALNA vs. PRAMILA OMPRAKASH MANTRI, JALNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

reopening of the assessment, the Assessing Officer in a speaking order rejected the objections raised by the assessee and completed the assessment u/s 143(3) / 147 wherein he disallowed the claim of long term capital gain

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, JALNA, JALNA vs. ATUL OMPRAKASH MANTRI, JALNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

reopening of the assessment, the Assessing Officer in a speaking order rejected the objections raised by the assessee and completed the assessment u/s 143(3) / 147 wherein he disallowed the claim of long term capital gain

A.C.I.T ,WARDHA CIRCLE , WARDHA , WARDHA vs. M/S KAPIL SOLVEX PVT .LTD , YAVATMAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2009-10

reopening of the assessment because the return of income showed certain income declared. However, a capital gain of the assessee

RAJANI PRAKASH KASHID,KOLHAPUR vs. ITO, WARD 1(4), KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

Assessment Year (“AY”) 2011-12. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :- “1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) is not justified in confirming the charge of capital gain when the machinery provision of computing capital gain fails in the absence of cost of acquisition incurred

ITO, WARD-1(1), SOLAPUR, SOLAPUR vs. MS. KSHIRSAGAR FABRICS, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2009-10

capital gain or casual income was not addressed, reopening of assessment to treat the long term capital gain as casual

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, JALNA, JALNA vs. ASHISH OMPRAKASH MANTRI, JALNA

reopening of the assessment, the Assessing Officer in a speaking order\nrejected the objections raised by the assessee and completed the assessment u/s\n143(3) / 147 wherein he disallowed the claim of long term capital gain

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 7 PUNE, PUNE vs. KOLTE PATIL INTEGRATED TOWNSHIPS LIMITED, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

gains from business was a subject\nmatter of consideration by the Assessing Officer during the original\nassessment proceedings leading to an order dated 12 October 2010. It\nwould therefore, follow that the reopening of the assessment by impugned\nnotice dated March 2013 is merely on the basis of change of opinion of the\nAssessing Officer from that held earlier during

RAJARSHI SHAHU SHIKSHAN SANSTHA INAM DHAMANI,SANGLI vs. ITO EXEMPTION, KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1121 To 1126/Pun/2024 Assessment Years : 2012-13 To 2017-18

capital gain. It is this scrutiny assessment the respondent desired to reopen for which impugned notice within the period of 4 years

RAJARSHI SHAHU SHIKSHAN SANSTHA INAM DHAMANI,SANGLI vs. ITO EXEMPTION, KOLHAPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1121 To 1126/Pun/2024 Assessment Years : 2012-13 To 2017-18

capital gain. It is this scrutiny assessment the respondent desired to reopen for which impugned notice within the period of 4 years

RAJARSHI SHAHU SHIKSHAN SANSTHA INAM DHAMANI,SANGLI vs. ITO EXEMPTION, KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.1121 To 1126/Pun/2024 Assessment Years : 2012-13 To 2017-18

capital gain. It is this scrutiny assessment the respondent desired to reopen for which impugned notice within the period of 4 years

NAVJYOTI FARMING PRIVATE LIMITED,BELAPUR vs. ITO, WARD -3 , PANVEL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2012-13

capital gains. The return was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). Subsequently, the case was selected for scrutiny and statutory notices 2 u/s 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act dated 07.08.2013 were issued and served on the assessee, in response to which the assessee filed the requisite details