YASHAVANTRAO CHAVAN SAHKARI DUDH UTPADAK SANATHA MARYADIT MALEVADI,SANGLI vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1),, SANGLI
The appeal is dismissed
ITA 654/PUN/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 May 2022AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri S. S. Godaraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.654/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Yashavantrao Chavan Vs. Ito, Ward- 1(1), Sangli. Sahkari Dudh Utpadak Sanatha Maryadit Malevadi, Malewadi At/Po: Kargani, Tal: Atpadi, Dist: Malewadi- 415306 Pan : Aaaay3278R Appellant Respondent Assessee By None : Revenue By : Shri Arvind Desai Date Of Hearing : 25.05.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 31.05.2022 आदेश / Order Per S. S. Godara, Jm: This Assessee’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2017-18 Arises Against The Cit(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi’S Order Dated 26.08.2021 Passed In Case No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2021-22/1035103206(1) Involving Proceedings U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; In Short The Act. Case Called Twice. None Appears At Assessee’S Behest. It Is Accordingly Proceeded Ex-Parte. 2. It Emerges At The Outset That The Assessee’S Instant Appeal Suffers From 36 Days Delay Involving Covid-19 Pandemic Outbreak
For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 143(3)Section 270ASection 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(b)
section 80(P)(2)(a)(iv) of Rs.38,69,712/- and added the same to the assessee’s total income.
Penalty proceedings u/s 270A of the Act were also initiated for under reporting of income.
6.5
The appellant failed to respond to the notice of AO whereby he was called upon to substantiate his claim to 80P (2) deduction claimed
