BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 5Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai41Delhi20Kolkata16Jaipur14Hyderabad7Ahmedabad6Chennai4Pune4Patna3Indore1Bangalore1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)6Section 133(6)5Bogus Purchases4Addition to Income4Section 143(1)2Section 143(2)2Section 1322Section 143(3)2Disallowance2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AURANGABAD vs. METAROLLS ISPAT PVT. LTD., JALNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed

ITA 932/PUN/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Feb 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2020-21

For Appellant: S/Shri Adv Rahul Kaul, CA AnandFor Respondent: S/Shri Amol Khairnar CIT-DR &
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)

bogus / untested purchases, therefore, we are of the considered opinion that adoption of the same percentage of profit i.e. 5% on such unaccounted sale of Rs.17,42,000/- should be added to the total income of the assessee which in the instant case comes to Rs.87,100/-. When the documents found containing certain transactions

Search & Seizure2
Penalty2
Survey u/s 133A2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME, AURANGABAD vs. METAROLLS ISPAT PVT. LTD, JALNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed

ITA 933/PUN/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Feb 2025AY 2021-22
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)

bogus / untested purchases, therefore, we are of the considered opinion that\nadoption of the same percentage of profit i.e. 5% on such unaccounted sale of\nRs.17,42,000/- should be added to the total income of the assessee which in the\ninstant case comes to Rs.87,100/-. When the documents found containing certain\ntransactions

KIRLOSKAR CHILLERS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, RANGE - 11,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 594/PUN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Aug 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Raviआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.594 & 595/Pun/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012-13 Kirloskar Chillers Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Jcit, Range-11, Pune. 8Th Floor, Cello Platina, Fergusson College Road, Shivajinagar, Pune-411005. Pan : Aabck1730B Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri C. H. Naniwadekar Revenue By : Shri S. P. Walimbe Date Of Hearing : 03.08.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 23.08.2022 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Different Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- 4, Pune [‘The Cit(A)’] Dated 01.02.2019 For The Assessment Years 2011-12 & 2012-13 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Two Appeals Of The Assessee, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.594/Pun/2019 For The Assessment Year 2011-12 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri C. H. NaniwadekarFor Respondent: Shri S. P. Walimbe
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

bogus purchases. Accordingly, the appellant company filed a revised return of income on 13.03.2013, offered the said additional income. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-11, Pune (‘the Assessing Officer’) vide order dated 10.03.2014 passed u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) accepting

KIRLOSKAR CHILLERS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, RANGE - 11,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 595/PUN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Aug 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Raviआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.594 & 595/Pun/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2011-12 & 2012-13 Kirloskar Chillers Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Jcit, Range-11, Pune. 8Th Floor, Cello Platina, Fergusson College Road, Shivajinagar, Pune-411005. Pan : Aabck1730B Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri C. H. Naniwadekar Revenue By : Shri S. P. Walimbe Date Of Hearing : 03.08.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 23.08.2022 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Different Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- 4, Pune [‘The Cit(A)’] Dated 01.02.2019 For The Assessment Years 2011-12 & 2012-13 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Two Appeals Of The Assessee, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.594/Pun/2019 For The Assessment Year 2011-12 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri C. H. NaniwadekarFor Respondent: Shri S. P. Walimbe
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

bogus purchases. Accordingly, the appellant company filed a revised return of income on 13.03.2013, offered the said additional income. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-11, Pune (‘the Assessing Officer’) vide order dated 10.03.2014 passed u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) accepting