Search: bogus purchases

4 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 292Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi124 Mumbai60 Kolkata36 Chennai33 Bangalore26 Jaipur25 Rajkot12 Hyderabad10 Nagpur8 Allahabad6 Surat6 Indore4 Jodhpur4 Pune4 Agra3 Panaji2 Ahmedabad2 Cuttack1 Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 132(4)4 Section 153C4 Section 1474 Section 1483 Search & Seizure3 Section 139(1)2 Section 143(1)2 Section 1322 Section 133A2 Survey u/s 133A

SHRI GANESH BHIVRAJ BHUTADA,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE1(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1131/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri V Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 153C

bogus accommodation entries and name of assessee was discovered as one of beneficiaries of alleged racket and further amounts were actually found in books of assessee to be credited in name of alleged entry operators, burden was on assessee to prove that it was not a beneficiary of racket and did not allow the ground of appeal of the assessee

SHRI GANESH BHIVRAJ BHUTADA,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE1(1), PUNE, PUNE

SHRI GANESH BHIVRAJ BHUTADA,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE1(1), PUNE, PUNE

SHRI GANESH BHIVRAJ BHUTADA,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE1(1), PUNE, PUNE

SHRI MANOJ MADANLAL CHHAJED,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1(1)PUNE, PUNE

ASHOK VIJAYKUMAR KOTECHA,JALGAON vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 1, JALGAON, JALGAON