SHRI GANESH BHIVRAJ BHUTADA,PUNE vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE1(1), PUNE, PUNE
In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 1131/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Mar 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamore
For Appellant: Shri V Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 153C
bogus accommodation entries and name of assessee was discovered as one of beneficiaries of alleged racket and further amounts were actually found in books of assessee to be credited in name of alleged entry operators, burden was on assessee to prove that it was not a beneficiary of racket and did not allow the ground of appeal of the assessee