Search: bogus purchases

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 158Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai65 Bangalore42 Delhi27 Chandigarh15 Kolkata13 Chennai9 Hyderabad8 Jaipur2 Guwahati2 Pune2 Indore1 Cuttack1 Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 139(1)2 Section 132(4)2 Section 1322 Search & Seizure2

HETAL RAKESH MEHTA ,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, CC-1(2), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1727/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune13 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2018-19 Hetal Rakesh Mehta Acit, Central Circle 1(2), 9/10, Vidya Nagar, 60 Feet Road, Vs. Pune Ghatkopar East, Mumbai – 400077 Pan: Ammpm9670L (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Ms Simran Dhawan (virtual)For Respondent: Shri Ravi Prakash

Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153A

purchases and consequent income arising from these transactions had already been fully disclosed and accounted for in the appellant's income tax return. 3. On the facts and in circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in ignoring the failure of the Assessing Officer to provide the appellant with a copy

HETAL RAKESH MEHTA ,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, CC-1(2), PUNE

HETAL RAKESH MEHTA ,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, CC-1(2), PUNE

SHRI MANOJ MADANLAL CHHAJED,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1(1)PUNE, PUNE