HETAL RAKESH MEHTA ,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, CC-1(2), PUNE
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed
ITA 1727/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune13 May 2025AY 2018-19
Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2018-19 Hetal Rakesh Mehta Acit, Central Circle 1(2), 9/10, Vidya Nagar, 60 Feet Road, Vs. Pune Ghatkopar East, Mumbai – 400077 Pan: Ammpm9670L (Appellant) (Respondent)
For Appellant: Ms Simran Dhawan (virtual)For Respondent: Shri Ravi Prakash
Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153A
purchases and consequent income arising from these transactions had already been fully disclosed and accounted for in the appellant's income tax return.
3. On the facts and in circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld.
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in ignoring the failure of the Assessing Officer to provide the appellant with a copy
