BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

266 results for “bogus purchases”+ Reopening of Assessmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,496Delhi1,012Kolkata421Jaipur379Surat308Ahmedabad297Pune266Chennai257Chandigarh155Bangalore149Hyderabad107Karnataka106Raipur74Rajkot68Guwahati62Cochin59Indore53Calcutta46Amritsar45Nagpur37Lucknow28Visakhapatnam24Patna22Agra21Dehradun9Cuttack9Ranchi8Jodhpur7Varanasi6Jabalpur3Orissa2Telangana2Punjab & Haryana1SC1

Key Topics

Section 148117Section 14782Section 143(3)61Addition to Income50Bogus Purchases48Reopening of Assessment36Section 10(38)26Disallowance26Section 143(2)24Section 132

BALRAJ SINGH MANDER,,RAIGAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PANVEL CIRCLE,, PANVEL

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1520/PUN/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reopening the assessment, the Hon’ble High Court refused to interfere by observing that the expression `reason to believe’ cannot be read to mean that the AO should have finally established beyond doubt that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr. CIT VS. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

M/S. AGARWAL PETROCHEM PVT.LTD,,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PANVEL CIRCLE,, PANVEL

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1000/PUN/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reopening the assessment, the Hon’ble High Court refused to interfere by observing that the expression `reason to believe’ cannot be read to mean that the AO should have finally established beyond doubt that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr. CIT VS. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

Showing 1–20 of 266 · Page 1 of 14

...
23
Section 143(1)20
Penny Stock17

M/S. AGARWAL PETROCHEM PVT.LTD,,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PANVEL CIRCLE,, PANVEL

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1003/PUN/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reopening the assessment, the Hon’ble High Court refused to interfere by observing that the expression `reason to believe’ cannot be read to mean that the AO should have finally established beyond doubt that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr. CIT VS. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PANVEL CIRCLE,, PANVEL vs. M/S. AGARWAL PETROCHEM PRIVATE LIMITED,, RAIGAD

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1094/PUN/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reopening the assessment, the Hon’ble High Court refused to interfere by observing that the expression `reason to believe’ cannot be read to mean that the AO should have finally established beyond doubt that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr. CIT VS. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

G.V. PUNTAMBEKAR & SONS PVT. LTD,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1(2),, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2946/PUN/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reopening the assessment, the Hon’ble High Court refused to interfere by observing that the expression `reason to believe’ cannot be read to mean that the AO should have finally established beyond doubt that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr. CIT VS. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

HAMADULE ENGINEERING PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 10,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2373/PUN/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reopening the assessment, the Hon’ble High Court refused to interfere by observing that the expression `reason to believe’ cannot be read to mean that the AO should have finally established beyond doubt that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr. CIT VS. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 5(1),, PUNE vs. M/S. VIRAJ STEELS,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2591/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reopening the assessment, the Hon’ble High Court refused to interfere by observing that the expression `reason to believe’ cannot be read to mean that the AO should have finally established beyond doubt that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr. CIT VS. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2,, NASHIK vs. SMT. ARCHANA PRASHANT SANGAI,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1881/PUN/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reopening the assessment, the Hon’ble High Court refused to interfere by observing that the expression `reason to believe’ cannot be read to mean that the AO should have finally established beyond doubt that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr. CIT VS. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

M/S. AGARWAL PETROCHEM PVT.LTD,,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PANVEL CIRCLE,, PANVEL

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1002/PUN/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reopening the assessment, the Hon’ble High Court refused to interfere by observing that the expression `reason to believe’ cannot be read to mean that the AO should have finally established beyond doubt that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr. CIT VS. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

MADHUBAN TRADE STEELS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 963/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reopening the assessment, the Hon’ble High Court refused to interfere by observing that the expression `reason to believe’ cannot be read to mean that the AO should have finally established beyond doubt that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr. CIT VS. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. CHANDRASHEKHAR ASHOK JOSHI,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2991/PUN/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reopening the assessment, the Hon’ble High Court refused to interfere by observing that the expression `reason to believe’ cannot be read to mean that the AO should have finally established beyond doubt that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr. CIT VS. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

RAJESH UMRAOSINGH PARDESHI,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 5,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2932/PUN/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reopening the assessment, the Hon’ble High Court refused to interfere by observing that the expression `reason to believe’ cannot be read to mean that the AO should have finally established beyond doubt that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr. CIT VS. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

M/S. VIRAJ STEELS,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 5,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2307/PUN/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reopening the assessment, the Hon’ble High Court refused to interfere by observing that the expression `reason to believe’ cannot be read to mean that the AO should have finally established beyond doubt that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr. CIT VS. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

VINAY BADERA,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 10,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2319/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reopening the assessment, the Hon’ble High Court refused to interfere by observing that the expression `reason to believe’ cannot be read to mean that the AO should have finally established beyond doubt that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr. CIT VS. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

KBK CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 11(1),, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1977/PUN/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reopening the assessment, the Hon’ble High Court refused to interfere by observing that the expression `reason to believe’ cannot be read to mean that the AO should have finally established beyond doubt that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr. CIT VS. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

SS TECHNO LIMITED,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1404/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reopening the assessment, the Hon’ble High Court refused to interfere by observing that the expression `reason to believe’ cannot be read to mean that the AO should have finally established beyond doubt that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr. CIT VS. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 2,, SOLAPUR vs. M/S. BEEKAY ENTERPRISES,, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1688/PUN/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reopening the assessment, the Hon’ble High Court refused to interfere by observing that the expression `reason to believe’ cannot be read to mean that the AO should have finally established beyond doubt that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr. CIT VS. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 2,, SOLAPUR vs. M/S. BEEKAY ENTERPRISES,, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1689/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reopening the assessment, the Hon’ble High Court refused to interfere by observing that the expression `reason to believe’ cannot be read to mean that the AO should have finally established beyond doubt that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr. CIT VS. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,PANVEL CIRCLE ,, PANVEL vs. BALRAJ SINGH MANDER,, RAIGAD

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2065/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reopening the assessment, the Hon’ble High Court refused to interfere by observing that the expression `reason to believe’ cannot be read to mean that the AO should have finally established beyond doubt that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr. CIT VS. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus

RENUKA AUTO COMPONENTS INDIA PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 10,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1659/PUN/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

reopening the assessment, the Hon’ble High Court refused to interfere by observing that the expression `reason to believe’ cannot be read to mean that the AO should have finally established beyond doubt that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Pr. CIT VS. Laxmiraj 11 Bogus