DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PANVEL CIRCLE,, PANVEL vs. M/S. AGARWAL PETROCHEM PRIVATE LIMITED,, RAIGAD
In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 1094/PUN/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2011-12
Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm
Bogus purchases group
26. However, the ld. Counsel for the assessee raised an additional issue
by contending that the assessment order requires to be quashed because
the AO did not confront the assessee with the adverse material used for
making the addition. This was strongly controverted by the ld. DR, who
stated that the assessee chose to remain absent during
