BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

626 results for “bogus purchases”+ Addition to Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai8,717Delhi3,078Kolkata1,269Ahmedabad705Jaipur697Chennai658Pune626Surat472Bangalore400Chandigarh343Hyderabad260Indore224Raipur209Rajkot134Nagpur130Amritsar127Karnataka116Lucknow91Cuttack86Visakhapatnam82Guwahati77Cochin72Calcutta64Agra61Jodhpur55Patna42Ranchi37Allahabad35Dehradun23Telangana22Jabalpur14Varanasi9Panaji7SC5Orissa3Gauhati2Bombay1Punjab & Haryana1Rajasthan1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 14890Section 143(3)78Addition to Income75Section 271(1)(c)64Section 6862Section 14756Bogus Purchases33Disallowance28Section 10(38)24Section 132

BALRAJ SINGH MANDER,,RAIGAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PANVEL CIRCLE,, PANVEL

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1520/PUN/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100% of bogus purchases

M/S. AGARWAL PETROCHEM PVT.LTD,,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PANVEL CIRCLE,, PANVEL

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1002/PUN/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100% of bogus purchases

Showing 1–20 of 626 · Page 1 of 32

...
22
Reopening of Assessment22
Section 133(6)20

M/S. AGARWAL PETROCHEM PVT.LTD,,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PANVEL CIRCLE,, PANVEL

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1000/PUN/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100% of bogus purchases

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PANVEL CIRCLE,, PANVEL vs. M/S. AGARWAL PETROCHEM PRIVATE LIMITED,, RAIGAD

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1094/PUN/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100% of bogus purchases

G.V. PUNTAMBEKAR & SONS PVT. LTD,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1(2),, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2946/PUN/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100% of bogus purchases

MADHUBAN TRADE STEELS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 963/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100% of bogus purchases

RAJESH UMRAOSINGH PARDESHI,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 5,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2932/PUN/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100% of bogus purchases

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,PANVEL CIRCLE ,, PANVEL vs. BALRAJ SINGH MANDER,, RAIGAD

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2065/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100% of bogus purchases

INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 5(1),, PUNE vs. M/S. VIRAJ STEELS,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2591/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100% of bogus purchases

M/S. AGARWAL PETROCHEM PVT.LTD,,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PANVEL CIRCLE,, PANVEL

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1003/PUN/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100% of bogus purchases

SS TECHNO LIMITED,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1404/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100% of bogus purchases

M/S. VIRAJ STEELS,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 5,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2307/PUN/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100% of bogus purchases

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 2,, SOLAPUR vs. M/S. BEEKAY ENTERPRISES,, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1688/PUN/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100% of bogus purchases

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 2,, SOLAPUR vs. M/S. BEEKAY ENTERPRISES,, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1689/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100% of bogus purchases

HAMADULE ENGINEERING PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 10,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2373/PUN/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100% of bogus purchases

VINAY BADERA,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 10,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2319/PUN/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100% of bogus purchases

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2,, NASHIK vs. SMT. ARCHANA PRASHANT SANGAI,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1881/PUN/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100% of bogus purchases

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. CHANDRASHEKHAR ASHOK JOSHI,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2991/PUN/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100% of bogus purchases

KBK CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 11(1),, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1977/PUN/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100% of bogus purchases

RENUKA AUTO COMPONENTS INDIA PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 10,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1659/PUN/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’). After entertaining and disposing of the objections from the concerned assessees, wherever raised, the respective AOs made additions @ 100% of bogus purchases