Search: TDS | BharatTax

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 50Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai85 Delhi51 Bangalore17 Jaipur11 Chennai11 Ahmedabad9 Guwahati9 Kolkata8 Lucknow5 Surat4 Pune3 Nagpur3 Agra3 Visakhapatnam2 Indore2 Jabalpur1 Patna1 Hyderabad1 Raipur1 Dehradun1 Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4 Section 2633 Section 36(1)(va)3 Section 2742 Section 270A2 Section 43C2 Addition to Income2

M/S KIRAN SANRAN ASSOCIATES,PUNE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 791/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Naveen RanderFor Respondent: Shri Keyur Patel, CIT-DR

Section 143(3)Section 2Section 263Section 28Section 36(1)(va)Section 43BSection 43C

50C reads as follows "Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (1), where (a) The assesses claims before any Assessing Officer that the value adopted or assessed or assessable by the stamp valuation authority under sub-section (1) exceeds the fair market value of the property as on the date of transfer, (b) the value so adopted or assessed

M/S KIRAN SANRAN ASSOCIATES,PUNE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), PUNE, PUNE

M/S KIRAN SANRAN ASSOCIATES,PUNE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), PUNE, PUNE

AAM INDIA MANUFACTURING CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, AHMEDNAGAR

BHANDARI ASSOCIATES,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2, PUNE, PUNE