ANJALI PUSHKAR HINGANE,,NASHIK vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(3),, NASHIK

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.2837/Pun/2017 "नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year : 2012-13 Anjali Pushkar Hingane, Prop. M/S Areen Petroleum Services, Saikheda Phata, At Post Chandori, Taluka- Niphad, Dist. Nashik. अपीलाथ"/Appellant Pan : Abiph8603F …. Vs. Ito, Ward- 1(3), …. ""यथ"/ Respondent Nashik.

TDS on the said interest amount and credited to the Government account while paying the interest. Rejecting the various explanations of the assessee, Assessing Officer invoking the provisions of section 40

THE RATNAKAR BANK LTD.,,KOLHAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, the appeal of assessee for assessment year 2010-11 is partly allowed in the terms aforesaid

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm

TDS provisions, the Assessing Officer made disallowance u/s. 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The ld. AR contended that the assessee is raising additional ground of appeal in respect of said disallowance in both the assessment years. By way of additional ground the assessee is praying that in the light of newly inserted second proviso to section

THE RATNAKAR BANK LTD.,,KOLHAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, the appeal of assessee for assessment year 2010-11 is partly allowed in the terms aforesaid

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm

TDS provisions, the Assessing Officer made disallowance u/s. 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The ld. AR contended that the assessee is raising additional ground of appeal in respect of said disallowance in both the assessment years. By way of additional ground the assessee is praying that in the light of newly inserted second proviso to section

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT LTD,AURANGABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

TDS returns in the manner as prescribed under sub-section (1) of section 200A vide the Notification No. 3/2013 dated 15.01.2013, the said power can only be utilised for determination of tax payable and not for interest, additional interest, or late fees. 2.5 In support of these submissions, the legal maxim of “Nemo dat quod non habet”also assumes importance

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

TDS returns in the manner as prescribed under sub-section (1) of section 200A vide the Notification No. 3/2013 dated 15.01.2013, the said power can only be utilised for determination of tax payable and not for interest, additional interest, or late fees. 2.5 In support of these submissions, the legal maxim of “Nemo dat quod non habet”also assumes importance

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

TDS returns in the manner as prescribed under sub-section (1) of section 200A vide the Notification No. 3/2013 dated 15.01.2013, the said power can only be utilised for determination of tax payable and not for interest, additional interest, or late fees. 2.5 In support of these submissions, the legal maxim of “Nemo dat quod non habet”also assumes importance

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

TDS returns in the manner as prescribed under sub-section (1) of section 200A vide the Notification No. 3/2013 dated 15.01.2013, the said power can only be utilised for determination of tax payable and not for interest, additional interest, or late fees. 2.5 In support of these submissions, the legal maxim of “Nemo dat quod non habet”also assumes importance

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

TDS returns in the manner as prescribed under sub-section (1) of section 200A vide the Notification No. 3/2013 dated 15.01.2013, the said power can only be utilised for determination of tax payable and not for interest, additional interest, or late fees. 2.5 In support of these submissions, the legal maxim of “Nemo dat quod non habet”also assumes importance

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

TDS returns in the manner as prescribed under sub-section (1) of section 200A vide the Notification No. 3/2013 dated 15.01.2013, the said power can only be utilised for determination of tax payable and not for interest, additional interest, or late fees. 2.5 In support of these submissions, the legal maxim of “Nemo dat quod non habet”also assumes importance

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

TDS returns in the manner as prescribed under sub-section (1) of section 200A vide the Notification No. 3/2013 dated 15.01.2013, the said power can only be utilised for determination of tax payable and not for interest, additional interest, or late fees. 2.5 In support of these submissions, the legal maxim of “Nemo dat quod non habet”also assumes importance

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD.,AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

TDS returns in the manner as prescribed under sub-section (1) of section 200A vide the Notification No. 3/2013 dated 15.01.2013, the said power can only be utilised for determination of tax payable and not for interest, additional interest, or late fees. 2.5 In support of these submissions, the legal maxim of “Nemo dat quod non habet”also assumes importance

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. BAJAJ FINANCE LTD., (FORMERLY: BAJAJ AUTO FINANCE LTD.,),, PUNE

In the result, appeal of Revenue and Cross Objections of assessee are dismissed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.356/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10

TDS demand again under section 201 and levy of interest under section 201(1A). Therefore, assessee‟s ground on this issue are to be allowed as the entire amount has been disallowed under the provisions of section 40

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

TDS returns\nin the manner as prescribed under sub-section (1) of section 200A vide\nthe Notification No. 3/2013 dated 15.01.2013, the said power can only\nbe utilised for determination of tax payable and not for interest,\nadditional interest, or late fees.\n2.5 In support of these submissions, the legal maxim of “Nemo dat\nquod non habet”also assumes importance

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

TDS returns\nin the manner as prescribed under sub-section (1) of section 200A vide\nthe Notification No. 3/2013 dated 15.01.2013, the said power can only\nbe utilised for determination of tax payable and not for interest,\nadditional interest, or late fees.\n2.5 In support of these submissions, the legal maxim of “Nemo dat\nquod non habet”also assumes importance

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD. AURANGABAD , AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

TDS returns\nin the manner as prescribed under sub-section (1) of section 200A vide\nthe Notification No. 3/2013 dated 15.01.2013, the said power can only\nbe utilised for determination of tax payable and not for interest,\nadditional interest, or late fees.\n2.5 In support of these submissions, the legal maxim of “Nemo dat\nquod non habet”also assumes importance

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

TDS returns\nin the manner as prescribed under sub-section (1) of section 200A vide\nthe Notification No. 3/2013 dated 15.01.2013, the said power can only\nbe utilised for determination of tax payable and not for interest,\nadditional interest, or late fees.\n2.5 In support of these submissions, the legal maxim of “Nemo dat\nquod non habet”also assumes importance

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

TDS returns\nin the manner as prescribed under sub-section (1) of section 200A vide\nthe Notification No. 3/2013 dated 15.01.2013, the said power can only\nbe utilised for determination of tax payable and not for interest,\nadditional interest, or late fees.\n2.5 In support of these submissions, the legal maxim of “Nemo dat\nquod non habet”also assumes importance

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD. ,AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

TDS returns\nin the manner as prescribed under sub-section (1) of section 200A vide\nthe Notification No. 3/2013 dated 15.01.2013, the said power can only\nbe utilised for determination of tax payable and not for interest,\nadditional interest, or late fees.\n2.5 In support of these submissions, the legal maxim of “Nemo dat\nquod non habet”also assumes importance