BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

185 results for “TDS”+ Section 272A(2)(k)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune185Delhi93Chennai86Mumbai56Bangalore48Kolkata18Ahmedabad14Cochin11Panaji10Agra8Raipur7Lucknow6Visakhapatnam5Nagpur5Jaipur3Hyderabad2Jodhpur2Chandigarh2Kerala1Guwahati1Cuttack1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 234E872Section 200A282Section 271H180TDS97Penalty53Section 200(3)47Section 272A45Section 272A(2)45Section 271H(1)(a)45Section 12A

DEPUTY COLLECTOR OFFICE,,UDGIR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS RANGE,, NASHIK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 319/PUN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.319/Pun/2019 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : - Deputy Collector Office, The Jcit, Tds, Range, Main Road, Udgir, Tq.Udgir, Vs Nashik. Dist.Latur - 413517. Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By None. Revenue By Shri S P Walimbe – Dr Date Of Hearing 29/06/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 04/07/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-2, Aurangabad Arising Out Of Assessing Officer’S Order Section 272A(2)(K) R.W.S 200(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Also Called As ‘The Act’) Dated 26.11.2018. 2. The Only Issue Involved In This Appeal Is Levy Of Penalty U/S.272A(2)(K) Of The Act. The Assessing Officer Vide Order Dated 05/02/2014 Levied Penalty U/S.272A(2)(K) Of The Act For Delay In Filling Quarterly Statements Of Tax Deducted At Source (Tds) U/S.200(3) Of The Act.

Section 192Section 198Section 199Section 200Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)Section 273B

Showing 1–20 of 185 · Page 1 of 10

...
36
Condonation of Delay31
Addition to Income12

TDS returns under section 272A(2)(k) of the Act. Since section 273B of the Act covers the cases of levy

STAR QUENCHERS SPIRIT PVT. LTD,NASHIK vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), RANGE, NASHIK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 251/PUN/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 May 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara& Dr. Dipak P. Ripotestar Quenchers Spirit Pvt. Vs Jcit – Tds Range, Ltd., Flat No.1-1, Basant Nashik. Building, Spandan Nagar, Cidco, Aurangabad. Pan: Aancs 2939 J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri M.G. Jasnani, Dr Date Of Hearing : 01/05/2023 Date Of Pronouncement : /05/2023 Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assesseeagainst The Orderof Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) [Nfac], Delhi,Dated 30.01.2023U/S. 250 R.W.S. 254 Of The Act For A.Y.2011-12.The Assesseehas Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: 1. Cit(A) Has Erred In Not Deleting The Rs.1,09,304/- Penalty As Directed By Itat In Its Order Para 4,5,6. Appellant Prays To Delete Whole Of The Penalty Confirmed By Cit(A) Of Rs. 1,09,304/- 2. Without Prejudice To Ground No.1 Rs. 1,09,304/- Cit(A) Has Erred In Exceeding His Jurisdiction In Conforming Penalty Of Star Quenchers Spirit Pvt. Ltd.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani, DR
Section 200(3)Section 250Section 272A(2)(k)

TDS statements. The Assessing Authority, therefore, in the absence of any explanation having been offered by the appellant, levied penalty under section 272A(2)(k

M/S. STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD,,NANDED vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS RANGE ,, NASHIK

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 2974/PUN/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Raviआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2974/Pun/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2011-12 M/S. State Bank Of Vs. Joint Cit, Tds Range, Hyderabad, Nashik. At Shrinagar, Nanded- 431602. Tan : Nskso8336G Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri M. G. Jasnani Date Of Hearing : 21.03.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 16.06.2022 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- 1, Aurangabad Dated 23.10.2017 For The Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. The Appellant Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1. Honorable Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Has Erred In Confirming The Penalty Of Rs.2,11,100/- U/S 272(A)2(K) Of The I.T. Act, 1961. Penalty May Please Be Cancelled. 2. Appellant Prays For Just & Equitable Relief. 3. Appellant Prays To Add, Alter, Amend And/Or Withdraw The Ground/S During The Proceedings.”

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri M. G. Jasnani
Section 200(3)Section 272Section 272A(2)(k)Section 273B

K) of the I.T. Act, 1961. Penalty may please be cancelled. 2. Appellant prays for just and equitable relief. 3. Appellant prays to add, alter, amend and/or withdraw the Ground/s during the Proceedings.” 2 3. Briefly, the facts of the case are as under : The appellant is a Branch of Public Sector Bank. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS

INTECH SURFACE COATING PVT LTD,PIRANGOOT, PUNE vs. TDS CPC, GAZIABAD, GAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 104/PUN/2021[2015-16 (Quarter 4) Form 26Q]Status: HeardITAT Pune07 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.92 To 108/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Intech Surface Coating Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cpc-Tds, Ltd., Ghaziabad. S.No.1073/1,2,3, Pirangoot, Mutha Road, Tal Mulshi – 412111. Pan : Aaaci4150J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 07.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Pune Dated 23.10.2019 For The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Seventeen Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.92/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

k) is done away in view of the insertion of Section 271H providing for penal provision for such failure to submit return. When the Parliament has simultaneously brought about Section 234E, Section 271H and the aforesaid proviso to Section 272A(2), it can be said that, the fee provided under Section 234E is contemplated to give a privilege

INTECH SURFACE COATING PVT LTD,PIRANGOOT, PUNE vs. TDS CPC, GAZIABAD, GAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 101/PUN/2021[26Q/Quarter-2/2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Pune07 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.92 To 108/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Intech Surface Coating Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cpc-Tds, Ltd., Ghaziabad. S.No.1073/1,2,3, Pirangoot, Mutha Road, Tal Mulshi – 412111. Pan : Aaaci4150J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 07.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Pune Dated 23.10.2019 For The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Seventeen Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.92/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

k) is done away in view of the insertion of Section 271H providing for penal provision for such failure to submit return. When the Parliament has simultaneously brought about Section 234E, Section 271H and the aforesaid proviso to Section 272A(2), it can be said that, the fee provided under Section 234E is contemplated to give a privilege

INTECH SURFACE COATING PVT LTD,PIRANGOOT, PUNE vs. ACIT, TDS CPC, GAZIABAD, GAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 97/PUN/2021[2014-15(Qtr-2 24Q)]Status: HeardITAT Pune07 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.92 To 108/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Intech Surface Coating Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cpc-Tds, Ltd., Ghaziabad. S.No.1073/1,2,3, Pirangoot, Mutha Road, Tal Mulshi – 412111. Pan : Aaaci4150J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 07.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Pune Dated 23.10.2019 For The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Seventeen Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.92/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

k) is done away in view of the insertion of Section 271H providing for penal provision for such failure to submit return. When the Parliament has simultaneously brought about Section 234E, Section 271H and the aforesaid proviso to Section 272A(2), it can be said that, the fee provided under Section 234E is contemplated to give a privilege

INTECH SURFACE COATING PVT LTD,PIRANGOOT, PUNE vs. TDS CPC, GAZIABAD, GAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 95/PUN/2021[2013-14 (Qtr-3 26Q)]Status: HeardITAT Pune07 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.92 To 108/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Intech Surface Coating Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cpc-Tds, Ltd., Ghaziabad. S.No.1073/1,2,3, Pirangoot, Mutha Road, Tal Mulshi – 412111. Pan : Aaaci4150J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 07.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Pune Dated 23.10.2019 For The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Seventeen Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.92/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

k) is done away in view of the insertion of Section 271H providing for penal provision for such failure to submit return. When the Parliament has simultaneously brought about Section 234E, Section 271H and the aforesaid proviso to Section 272A(2), it can be said that, the fee provided under Section 234E is contemplated to give a privilege

INTECH SURFACE COATING PVT LTD,PUNE vs. ACIT TDS CPC, GAZIABAD, GAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 107/PUN/2021[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Pune07 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.92 To 108/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Intech Surface Coating Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cpc-Tds, Ltd., Ghaziabad. S.No.1073/1,2,3, Pirangoot, Mutha Road, Tal Mulshi – 412111. Pan : Aaaci4150J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 07.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Pune Dated 23.10.2019 For The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Seventeen Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.92/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

k) is done away in view of the insertion of Section 271H providing for penal provision for such failure to submit return. When the Parliament has simultaneously brought about Section 234E, Section 271H and the aforesaid proviso to Section 272A(2), it can be said that, the fee provided under Section 234E is contemplated to give a privilege

INTECH SURFACE COATING PVT LTD,PIRANGOOT, PUNE vs. ACIT, TDS CPC, GAZIABAD, GAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 93/PUN/2021[2013-14 (Qtr-4 24Q)]Status: HeardITAT Pune07 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.92 To 108/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Intech Surface Coating Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cpc-Tds, Ltd., Ghaziabad. S.No.1073/1,2,3, Pirangoot, Mutha Road, Tal Mulshi – 412111. Pan : Aaaci4150J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 07.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Pune Dated 23.10.2019 For The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Seventeen Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.92/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

k) is done away in view of the insertion of Section 271H providing for penal provision for such failure to submit return. When the Parliament has simultaneously brought about Section 234E, Section 271H and the aforesaid proviso to Section 272A(2), it can be said that, the fee provided under Section 234E is contemplated to give a privilege

INTECH SURFACE COATING PVT LTD,PIRANGOOT, PUNE vs. TDS CPC, GAZIABAD, GAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 94/PUN/2021[2013-14 (2 Q - 26Q)]Status: HeardITAT Pune07 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.92 To 108/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Intech Surface Coating Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cpc-Tds, Ltd., Ghaziabad. S.No.1073/1,2,3, Pirangoot, Mutha Road, Tal Mulshi – 412111. Pan : Aaaci4150J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 07.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Pune Dated 23.10.2019 For The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Seventeen Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.92/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

k) is done away in view of the insertion of Section 271H providing for penal provision for such failure to submit return. When the Parliament has simultaneously brought about Section 234E, Section 271H and the aforesaid proviso to Section 272A(2), it can be said that, the fee provided under Section 234E is contemplated to give a privilege

INTECH SURFACE COATING PVT LTD,PIRANGOOT, PUNE vs. ACIT, TDS CPC, GAZIABAD, GAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 98/PUN/2021[2014-15(Qtr-3, 24Q)]Status: HeardITAT Pune07 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.92 To 108/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Intech Surface Coating Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cpc-Tds, Ltd., Ghaziabad. S.No.1073/1,2,3, Pirangoot, Mutha Road, Tal Mulshi – 412111. Pan : Aaaci4150J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 07.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Pune Dated 23.10.2019 For The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Seventeen Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.92/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

k) is done away in view of the insertion of Section 271H providing for penal provision for such failure to submit return. When the Parliament has simultaneously brought about Section 234E, Section 271H and the aforesaid proviso to Section 272A(2), it can be said that, the fee provided under Section 234E is contemplated to give a privilege

INTECH SURFACE COATING PVT LTD,PIRANGOOT, PUNE vs. TDS CPC, GAZIABAD, GAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 105/PUN/2021[26Q/Quarter-1/2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Pune07 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.92 To 108/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Intech Surface Coating Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cpc-Tds, Ltd., Ghaziabad. S.No.1073/1,2,3, Pirangoot, Mutha Road, Tal Mulshi – 412111. Pan : Aaaci4150J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 07.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Pune Dated 23.10.2019 For The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Seventeen Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.92/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

k) is done away in view of the insertion of Section 271H providing for penal provision for such failure to submit return. When the Parliament has simultaneously brought about Section 234E, Section 271H and the aforesaid proviso to Section 272A(2), it can be said that, the fee provided under Section 234E is contemplated to give a privilege

INTECH SURFACE COATING PVT LTD,PIRANGOOT, PUNE vs. TDS CPC, GAZIABAD, GAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 103/PUN/2021[26Q/Quarter-1/2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Pune07 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.92 To 108/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Intech Surface Coating Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cpc-Tds, Ltd., Ghaziabad. S.No.1073/1,2,3, Pirangoot, Mutha Road, Tal Mulshi – 412111. Pan : Aaaci4150J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 07.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Pune Dated 23.10.2019 For The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Seventeen Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.92/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

k) is done away in view of the insertion of Section 271H providing for penal provision for such failure to submit return. When the Parliament has simultaneously brought about Section 234E, Section 271H and the aforesaid proviso to Section 272A(2), it can be said that, the fee provided under Section 234E is contemplated to give a privilege

INTECH SURFACE COATING PVT LTD,PIRANGOOT, PUNE vs. TDS CPC, GAZIABAD, GAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 102/PUN/2021[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Pune07 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.92 To 108/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Intech Surface Coating Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cpc-Tds, Ltd., Ghaziabad. S.No.1073/1,2,3, Pirangoot, Mutha Road, Tal Mulshi – 412111. Pan : Aaaci4150J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 07.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Pune Dated 23.10.2019 For The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Seventeen Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.92/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

k) is done away in view of the insertion of Section 271H providing for penal provision for such failure to submit return. When the Parliament has simultaneously brought about Section 234E, Section 271H and the aforesaid proviso to Section 272A(2), it can be said that, the fee provided under Section 234E is contemplated to give a privilege

INTECH SURFACE COATING PVT LTD,PUNE vs. ACIT TDS CPC, GAZIABAD, GAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 108/PUN/2021[205-16 (Quarter -4) TDS Statement in Form 26Q)]Status: HeardITAT Pune07 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.92 To 108/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Intech Surface Coating Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cpc-Tds, Ltd., Ghaziabad. S.No.1073/1,2,3, Pirangoot, Mutha Road, Tal Mulshi – 412111. Pan : Aaaci4150J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 07.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Pune Dated 23.10.2019 For The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Seventeen Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.92/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

k) is done away in view of the insertion of Section 271H providing for penal provision for such failure to submit return. When the Parliament has simultaneously brought about Section 234E, Section 271H and the aforesaid proviso to Section 272A(2), it can be said that, the fee provided under Section 234E is contemplated to give a privilege

INTECH SURFACE COATING PVT LTD,PIRANGOOT, PUNE vs. TDS CPC, GAZIABAD, GAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 100/PUN/2021[2014-15 ( Y. 2013-14 Qr. -1)]Status: HeardITAT Pune07 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.92 To 108/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Intech Surface Coating Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cpc-Tds, Ltd., Ghaziabad. S.No.1073/1,2,3, Pirangoot, Mutha Road, Tal Mulshi – 412111. Pan : Aaaci4150J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 07.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Pune Dated 23.10.2019 For The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Seventeen Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.92/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

k) is done away in view of the insertion of Section 271H providing for penal provision for such failure to submit return. When the Parliament has simultaneously brought about Section 234E, Section 271H and the aforesaid proviso to Section 272A(2), it can be said that, the fee provided under Section 234E is contemplated to give a privilege

INTECH SURFACE COATING PVT LTD,PIRANGOOT, PUNE vs. ACIT, TDS CPC, GAZIABAD, GAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 99/PUN/2021[2014-15(Qtr-4 24Q)]Status: HeardITAT Pune07 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.92 To 108/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Intech Surface Coating Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cpc-Tds, Ltd., Ghaziabad. S.No.1073/1,2,3, Pirangoot, Mutha Road, Tal Mulshi – 412111. Pan : Aaaci4150J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 07.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Pune Dated 23.10.2019 For The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Seventeen Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.92/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

k) is done away in view of the insertion of Section 271H providing for penal provision for such failure to submit return. When the Parliament has simultaneously brought about Section 234E, Section 271H and the aforesaid proviso to Section 272A(2), it can be said that, the fee provided under Section 234E is contemplated to give a privilege

INTECH SURFACE COATING PVT. LTD.,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 106/PUN/2021[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Pune07 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.92 To 108/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Intech Surface Coating Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cpc-Tds, Ltd., Ghaziabad. S.No.1073/1,2,3, Pirangoot, Mutha Road, Tal Mulshi – 412111. Pan : Aaaci4150J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 07.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Pune Dated 23.10.2019 For The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Seventeen Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.92/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

k) is done away in view of the insertion of Section 271H providing for penal provision for such failure to submit return. When the Parliament has simultaneously brought about Section 234E, Section 271H and the aforesaid proviso to Section 272A(2), it can be said that, the fee provided under Section 234E is contemplated to give a privilege

INTECH SURFACE COATING PVT LTD,PIRANGOOT, PUNE vs. TDS CPC, GAZIABAD, GAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 92/PUN/2021[2013-14(Qtr-3 24Q)]Status: HeardITAT Pune07 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.92 To 108/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Intech Surface Coating Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cpc-Tds, Ltd., Ghaziabad. S.No.1073/1,2,3, Pirangoot, Mutha Road, Tal Mulshi – 412111. Pan : Aaaci4150J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 07.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Pune Dated 23.10.2019 For The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Seventeen Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.92/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

k) is done away in view of the insertion of Section 271H providing for penal provision for such failure to submit return. When the Parliament has simultaneously brought about Section 234E, Section 271H and the aforesaid proviso to Section 272A(2), it can be said that, the fee provided under Section 234E is contemplated to give a privilege

INTECH SURFACE COATING PVT LTD,PIRANGOOT, PUNE vs. TDS CPC, GAZIABAD, GAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 96/PUN/2021[2014-15(Qtr-1 24Q)]Status: HeardITAT Pune07 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.92 To 108/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Intech Surface Coating Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cpc-Tds, Ltd., Ghaziabad. S.No.1073/1,2,3, Pirangoot, Mutha Road, Tal Mulshi – 412111. Pan : Aaaci4150J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kishor B. Phadke Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 07.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Pune Dated 23.10.2019 For The Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Seventeen Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.92/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2013-14 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

k) is done away in view of the insertion of Section 271H providing for penal provision for such failure to submit return. When the Parliament has simultaneously brought about Section 234E, Section 271H and the aforesaid proviso to Section 272A(2), it can be said that, the fee provided under Section 234E is contemplated to give a privilege