BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

321 results for “TDS”+ Section 250(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,447Delhi818Bangalore551Kolkata441Chennai326Pune321Ahmedabad283Raipur276Patna193Hyderabad189Jaipur173Cochin153Chandigarh132Nagpur109Amritsar92Karnataka85Indore83Rajkot75Lucknow74Surat69Visakhapatnam60Guwahati44Panaji41Cuttack40Jodhpur37Ranchi30Jabalpur24Dehradun21Agra20Allahabad14Varanasi6SC3Telangana3Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 234E284Section 200A115TDS86Section 25073Section 200(3)52Section 201(1)40Section 20134Section 200A(1)(c)34Section 14834Deduction

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), PUNE, PUNE vs. ENTERPRISEDB SOFTWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, PUNE

ITA 989/PUN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri G. D. Padmahshali & Hon’Ble Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 989/Pun/2023 & Co No. 008/Pun/2024 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(1), Pune . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant

For Appellant: Mr Rajendra Agiwal [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Ms Sonal Sonkavde [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 1Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 195Section 195(1)Section 246A(1)Section 250Section 253(2)Section 40

250 by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [in short ‘NFAC/CIT(A)’] anent to assessment year 2017-18 [in short ‘AY’] which in turn arisen out of order of assessment dt. 29/09/2019 passed u/s 143(3) of the Act by learned Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1(2), Pune [in short ‘AO’]. The assessee also preferred a cross objection

Showing 1–20 of 321 · Page 1 of 17

...
30
Addition to Income27
Disallowance21

DEMAG CRANES AND COMPONENTS GMBH,PUNE vs. ACIT(IT)CIRCLE 1, PUNE, PUNE

The appeal is ALLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSE

ITA 1115/PUN/2023[AY 2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Nov 2023

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No. 1115/Pun/2023 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12

For Appellant: Mr Ashish Daweshar [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Ramnath Murkunde [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 147Section 148Section 246A(1)(a)Section 250Section 250(6)Section 251Section 251(1)(a)

TDS thereon. In the evince thereof, the appellant was called upon file return for AY 2011-12. Consequently, the case of the appellant was reopened by service of notice u/s 148 of the Act and an assessment order u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act was passed by assessing the total income of the appellant

CIAN AGRO INDUSTRIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ACIT (IT) CIRCLE 1, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 676/PUN/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Sept 2025AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Hitesh P Shah (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 133(6)Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 9(1)(vi)

6) of the Act, through ITBA was issued to the assessee on the basis of remittances without deduction of tax at source (“TDS”) on the strength of 15CA Forms. Accordingly, statutory notices were issued and served upon the assessee from time to time requesting the assessee to furnish its reply, which remained uncomplied with. Thereafter, the assessee submitted its reply

PUDHARI PUBLICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLHAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR

In the result, both appeals of the assessee in ITA

ITA 12/PUN/2024[2021-22]Status: HeardITAT Pune20 Feb 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.10 To 12/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2019-20, 2020-21 & 2021-22 Pudhari Publications Private Ltd., The Ito, Tds, 2318, C Ward, Pudhari Bhavan, V Kolhapur – 416003. Bhausingji Road, S Kolhapur – 416002. Pan: Aadcp2453Q Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri S.N.Puranik – Ar Revenue By Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari – Dr Date Of Hearing 19/02/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20/02/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 All Dated 10.11.2023. Since Issue Involved Is Same, All These Appeals Were Heard Together & Decided By This Consolidated Order. We Treat Appeal In Ita No.10/Pun/2024 For A.Y.2019-20, As A Lead Case. The Assessee For A.Y.2019-20 Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :

Section 154Section 192Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 250Section 250(4)Section 250(6)Section 251Section 251(1)(a)

6,78,210 for delayed payment of TDS on Salary without appreciating the taw that responsibility’ to deduct TDS under section 192 arises only at the time of payment of salary and there was no such delay in payment of TDS. 3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of case and in law, CIT(A) was correct

PUDHARI PUBLICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLHAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ,TDS, KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR

In the result, both appeals of the assessee in ITA

ITA 10/PUN/2024[2019-20]Status: HeardITAT Pune20 Feb 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.10 To 12/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2019-20, 2020-21 & 2021-22 Pudhari Publications Private Ltd., The Ito, Tds, 2318, C Ward, Pudhari Bhavan, V Kolhapur – 416003. Bhausingji Road, S Kolhapur – 416002. Pan: Aadcp2453Q Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri S.N.Puranik – Ar Revenue By Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari – Dr Date Of Hearing 19/02/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20/02/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 All Dated 10.11.2023. Since Issue Involved Is Same, All These Appeals Were Heard Together & Decided By This Consolidated Order. We Treat Appeal In Ita No.10/Pun/2024 For A.Y.2019-20, As A Lead Case. The Assessee For A.Y.2019-20 Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :

Section 154Section 192Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 250Section 250(4)Section 250(6)Section 251Section 251(1)(a)

6,78,210 for delayed payment of TDS on Salary without appreciating the taw that responsibility’ to deduct TDS under section 192 arises only at the time of payment of salary and there was no such delay in payment of TDS. 3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of case and in law, CIT(A) was correct

PUDHARI PUBLICATIONS PRIVATE LTD,KOLHAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR

In the result, both appeals of the assessee in ITA

ITA 11/PUN/2024[2020-21]Status: HeardITAT Pune20 Feb 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.10 To 12/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2019-20, 2020-21 & 2021-22 Pudhari Publications Private Ltd., The Ito, Tds, 2318, C Ward, Pudhari Bhavan, V Kolhapur – 416003. Bhausingji Road, S Kolhapur – 416002. Pan: Aadcp2453Q Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri S.N.Puranik – Ar Revenue By Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari – Dr Date Of Hearing 19/02/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20/02/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 All Dated 10.11.2023. Since Issue Involved Is Same, All These Appeals Were Heard Together & Decided By This Consolidated Order. We Treat Appeal In Ita No.10/Pun/2024 For A.Y.2019-20, As A Lead Case. The Assessee For A.Y.2019-20 Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :

Section 154Section 192Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 250Section 250(4)Section 250(6)Section 251Section 251(1)(a)

6,78,210 for delayed payment of TDS on Salary without appreciating the taw that responsibility’ to deduct TDS under section 192 arises only at the time of payment of salary and there was no such delay in payment of TDS. 3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of case and in law, CIT(A) was correct

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. AISHWARYA CONSTRUCTION CO.,, AURANGABAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical

ITA 2036/PUN/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Mar 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita No.2036/Pun/2014 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11 वष"

For Appellant: Shri M.K. KulkarniFor Respondent: Smt. Nirupama Kotru, CIT-DR
Section 131Section 133ASection 142Section 143(3)Section 194Section 36(1)(iii)Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 68Section 69C

TDS not deducted u/s.194-I of the Act. 6. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld.CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of Rs.4,18,35,803/- towards disallowance of labour payment u/s.40A(3)/40(a)(ia) of the Act. 7. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case

RAVINDRA BHAUSAHEB MADHAVAI ,NASHIK vs. ITO WARD 1(1), NASHIK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1737/PUN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Nov 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1737/Pun/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 250

250 (Bom.) held that in the matter of condonation of delay an overall view in the larger interest of justice has to be taken. None should be deprived of an adjudication on merits unless the Court of law or the Tribunal/Appellate Authority finds that the litigant has deliberately and intentionally delayed filing of the appeal, that he is careless, negligent

NORD DRIVESYSTEMS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS (CPC),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee as hereinabove mentioned are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1453/PUN/2018[2014-15 (24Q/Qtr-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Jul 2019

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Sharad Shah & Shri Rohit TapadiyaFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Verma
Section 250(6)

section 250(6) of the Act. At the same time, we direct the assessee to be present for hearing before the Ld. CIT(Appeals) with all relevant documentary evidences and present their case on merits and the Ld. CIT(Appeals) shall adjudicate this matter after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. 7. In the result, all the appeals

NORD DRIVESYSTEMS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS (CPC),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee as hereinabove mentioned are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1446/PUN/2018[2013-14 (24Q/Qtr-3)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Jul 2019

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Sharad Shah & Shri Rohit TapadiyaFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Verma
Section 250(6)

section 250(6) of the Act. At the same time, we direct the assessee to be present for hearing before the Ld. CIT(Appeals) with all relevant documentary evidences and present their case on merits and the Ld. CIT(Appeals) shall adjudicate this matter after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. 7. In the result, all the appeals

NORD DRIVESYSTEMS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS (CPC),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee as hereinabove mentioned are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1449/PUN/2018[2013-14 (26Q/Qtr-4)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Jul 2019

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Sharad Shah & Shri Rohit TapadiyaFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Verma
Section 250(6)

section 250(6) of the Act. At the same time, we direct the assessee to be present for hearing before the Ld. CIT(Appeals) with all relevant documentary evidences and present their case on merits and the Ld. CIT(Appeals) shall adjudicate this matter after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. 7. In the result, all the appeals

NORD DRIVESYSTEMS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS (CPC),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee as hereinabove mentioned are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1451/PUN/2018[2013-14 (27Q/Qtr-3)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Jul 2019

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Sharad Shah & Shri Rohit TapadiyaFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Verma
Section 250(6)

section 250(6) of the Act. At the same time, we direct the assessee to be present for hearing before the Ld. CIT(Appeals) with all relevant documentary evidences and present their case on merits and the Ld. CIT(Appeals) shall adjudicate this matter after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. 7. In the result, all the appeals

NORD DRIVESYSTEMS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS (CPC),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee as hereinabove mentioned are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1450/PUN/2018[2013-14 (27Q/Qtr-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Jul 2019

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Sharad Shah & Shri Rohit TapadiyaFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Verma
Section 250(6)

section 250(6) of the Act. At the same time, we direct the assessee to be present for hearing before the Ld. CIT(Appeals) with all relevant documentary evidences and present their case on merits and the Ld. CIT(Appeals) shall adjudicate this matter after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. 7. In the result, all the appeals

NORD DRIVESYSTEMS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS (CPC),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee as hereinabove mentioned are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1447/PUN/2018[2013-14 (26Q/Qtr2)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Jul 2019

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Sharad Shah & Shri Rohit TapadiyaFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Verma
Section 250(6)

section 250(6) of the Act. At the same time, we direct the assessee to be present for hearing before the Ld. CIT(Appeals) with all relevant documentary evidences and present their case on merits and the Ld. CIT(Appeals) shall adjudicate this matter after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. 7. In the result, all the appeals

NORD DRIVESYSTEMS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS (CPC),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee as hereinabove mentioned are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1452/PUN/2018[2013-14 (27Q/Qtr4)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Jul 2019

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Sharad Shah & Shri Rohit TapadiyaFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Verma
Section 250(6)

section 250(6) of the Act. At the same time, we direct the assessee to be present for hearing before the Ld. CIT(Appeals) with all relevant documentary evidences and present their case on merits and the Ld. CIT(Appeals) shall adjudicate this matter after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. 7. In the result, all the appeals

NORD DRIVESYSTEMS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS (CPC),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee as hereinabove mentioned are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1459/PUN/2018[2014-15 (27Q/Qtr-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Jul 2019

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Sharad Shah & Shri Rohit TapadiyaFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Verma
Section 250(6)

section 250(6) of the Act. At the same time, we direct the assessee to be present for hearing before the Ld. CIT(Appeals) with all relevant documentary evidences and present their case on merits and the Ld. CIT(Appeals) shall adjudicate this matter after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. 7. In the result, all the appeals

NORD DRIVESYSTEMS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS (CPC),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee as hereinabove mentioned are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1460/PUN/2018[2014-15 (27Q/Qtr-3)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Jul 2019

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Sharad Shah & Shri Rohit TapadiyaFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Verma
Section 250(6)

section 250(6) of the Act. At the same time, we direct the assessee to be present for hearing before the Ld. CIT(Appeals) with all relevant documentary evidences and present their case on merits and the Ld. CIT(Appeals) shall adjudicate this matter after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. 7. In the result, all the appeals

NORD DRIVESYSTEMS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS (CPC),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee as hereinabove mentioned are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1458/PUN/2018[2014-15 (27Q/Qtr-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Jul 2019

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Sharad Shah & Shri Rohit TapadiyaFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Verma
Section 250(6)

section 250(6) of the Act. At the same time, we direct the assessee to be present for hearing before the Ld. CIT(Appeals) with all relevant documentary evidences and present their case on merits and the Ld. CIT(Appeals) shall adjudicate this matter after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. 7. In the result, all the appeals

NORD DRIVESYSTEMS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS (CPC),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee as hereinabove mentioned are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1456/PUN/2018[2014-15 (26Q/Qtr-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Jul 2019

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Sharad Shah & Shri Rohit TapadiyaFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Verma
Section 250(6)

section 250(6) of the Act. At the same time, we direct the assessee to be present for hearing before the Ld. CIT(Appeals) with all relevant documentary evidences and present their case on merits and the Ld. CIT(Appeals) shall adjudicate this matter after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. 7. In the result, all the appeals

NORD DRIVESYSTEMS PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS (CPC),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee as hereinabove mentioned are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1454/PUN/2018[2014-15 (24Q/Qtr-3)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Jul 2019

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Sharad Shah & Shri Rohit TapadiyaFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Verma
Section 250(6)

section 250(6) of the Act. At the same time, we direct the assessee to be present for hearing before the Ld. CIT(Appeals) with all relevant documentary evidences and present their case on merits and the Ld. CIT(Appeals) shall adjudicate this matter after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. 7. In the result, all the appeals