BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

295 results for “TDS”+ Section 250(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,516Delhi852Bangalore573Kolkata453Chennai347Pune295Raipur277Ahmedabad249Patna194Hyderabad160Jaipur158Cochin124Nagpur108Chandigarh106Karnataka85Indore78Amritsar77Rajkot73Lucknow69Surat67Visakhapatnam49Guwahati45Panaji41Cuttack32Jodhpur27Dehradun23Jabalpur22Ranchi20Agra19Allahabad14Varanasi6SC3Telangana3Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 234E270Section 200A119TDS84Section 25077Section 200(3)55Section 200A(1)(c)36Section 201(1)33Section 14832Addition to Income28Section 143(3)

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 5 PUNE, PUNE vs. DIPTI NARENDRA LULLA, PUNE

ITA 1065/PUN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Dec 2025AY 2018-19
Section 143(2)

TDS has been ensured in almost all cases. Since the funds are\nused for business purpose, interest has been rightly claimed by \"A\". Same needs to\nbe allowed. In any case, this ground will get automatically decided once our earlier\ntwo grounds get decided, and as such, same is left at that.\n9.2 Since addition made

PUDHARI PUBLICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLHAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR

In the result, both appeals of the assessee in ITA

ITA 12/PUN/2024[2021-22]Status: HeardITAT Pune20 Feb 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.10 To 12/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2019-20, 2020-21 & 2021-22 Pudhari Publications Private Ltd., The Ito, Tds, 2318, C Ward, Pudhari Bhavan, V Kolhapur – 416003. Bhausingji Road, S Kolhapur – 416002. Pan: Aadcp2453Q Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri S.N.Puranik – Ar Revenue By Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari – Dr Date Of Hearing 19/02/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20/02/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 All Dated 10.11.2023. Since Issue Involved Is Same, All These Appeals Were Heard Together & Decided By This Consolidated Order. We Treat Appeal In Ita No.10/Pun/2024 For A.Y.2019-20, As A Lead Case. The Assessee For A.Y.2019-20 Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :

Showing 1–20 of 295 · Page 1 of 15

...
26
Deduction26
Disallowance21
Section 154Section 192Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 250Section 250(4)Section 250(6)Section 251Section 251(1)(a)

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 all dated 10.11.2023. Since issue involved is same, all these appeals were heard together and decided by this consolidated order. We treat appeal in ITA No.10/PUN/2024 for A.Y.2019-20, as a lead case. The assessee for A.Y.2019-20 has raised the following grounds of appeal : ITA Nos.10 to 12/PUN/2024 Pudhari Publications Private

PUDHARI PUBLICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLHAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ,TDS, KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR

In the result, both appeals of the assessee in ITA

ITA 10/PUN/2024[2019-20]Status: HeardITAT Pune20 Feb 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.10 To 12/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2019-20, 2020-21 & 2021-22 Pudhari Publications Private Ltd., The Ito, Tds, 2318, C Ward, Pudhari Bhavan, V Kolhapur – 416003. Bhausingji Road, S Kolhapur – 416002. Pan: Aadcp2453Q Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri S.N.Puranik – Ar Revenue By Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari – Dr Date Of Hearing 19/02/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20/02/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 All Dated 10.11.2023. Since Issue Involved Is Same, All These Appeals Were Heard Together & Decided By This Consolidated Order. We Treat Appeal In Ita No.10/Pun/2024 For A.Y.2019-20, As A Lead Case. The Assessee For A.Y.2019-20 Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :

Section 154Section 192Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 250Section 250(4)Section 250(6)Section 251Section 251(1)(a)

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 all dated 10.11.2023. Since issue involved is same, all these appeals were heard together and decided by this consolidated order. We treat appeal in ITA No.10/PUN/2024 for A.Y.2019-20, as a lead case. The assessee for A.Y.2019-20 has raised the following grounds of appeal : ITA Nos.10 to 12/PUN/2024 Pudhari Publications Private

PUDHARI PUBLICATIONS PRIVATE LTD,KOLHAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR

In the result, both appeals of the assessee in ITA

ITA 11/PUN/2024[2020-21]Status: HeardITAT Pune20 Feb 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.10 To 12/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2019-20, 2020-21 & 2021-22 Pudhari Publications Private Ltd., The Ito, Tds, 2318, C Ward, Pudhari Bhavan, V Kolhapur – 416003. Bhausingji Road, S Kolhapur – 416002. Pan: Aadcp2453Q Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri S.N.Puranik – Ar Revenue By Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari – Dr Date Of Hearing 19/02/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20/02/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 All Dated 10.11.2023. Since Issue Involved Is Same, All These Appeals Were Heard Together & Decided By This Consolidated Order. We Treat Appeal In Ita No.10/Pun/2024 For A.Y.2019-20, As A Lead Case. The Assessee For A.Y.2019-20 Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :

Section 154Section 192Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 250Section 250(4)Section 250(6)Section 251Section 251(1)(a)

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 all dated 10.11.2023. Since issue involved is same, all these appeals were heard together and decided by this consolidated order. We treat appeal in ITA No.10/PUN/2024 for A.Y.2019-20, as a lead case. The assessee for A.Y.2019-20 has raised the following grounds of appeal : ITA Nos.10 to 12/PUN/2024 Pudhari Publications Private

M/S. PIAGGIO VEHICLES PVT.LTD,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 4,, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 868/PUN/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Dec 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.868/Pun/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16 Piaggio Vehicles Private Ltd., V The Assistant Sky One Corporate Park, S Commissioner Of Income Ground Floor, Survey Tax, Circle-4, Pune. No.239/02, Near Pune Airport, Pune – 411032. Pan: Aabcp1225G Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Siddhesh Chaugule – Ar Revenue By Shri Vidya Ratan - Dr Date Of Hearing 18/12/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 23/12/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-13, Pune For Assessment Year 2015-16 Dated 06.10.2022 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal : “1. Refund Of Excess Taxes Paid On Dividend Distributed On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Hon'Ble Cit(A) Has Erred In Not Granting The Benefit Of Article 11 Of The India-

Section 115Section 2(24)Section 250Section 3Section 4

250 of the Income tax Act, 1961. The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal : “1. Refund of excess taxes paid on dividend distributed On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble CIT(A) has erred in not granting the benefit of Article 11 of the India- Italy Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA

JOHN DEERE INDIA PVT. LTD,PUNE vs. CIT(A) , DEHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2477/PUN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms.Astha Chandra & Dr.Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2477/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15 John Deere India Pvt. Ltd., V The Commissioner Of Tower 14, Cyber City, S Income Tax(Appeals), Magarpatta City, Hadapsar, Nfac, Delhi. Pune – 411013. Pan: Aaacj4233B Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Nikhil Pathak – Ar Revenue By Shri Prakash L Pathade – Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 22/01/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 27/01/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeal)[Nfac] Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For A.Y.2014-15; Dated 27.09.2024. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal : “1] The Learned Cit(A) Erred In Using Same Statement Of Facts & Findings For Assessment Years 2011-12 & 2014-15 Whereas The Statement Of Facts & Findings Are Not Relevant At All For Assessment Year 2014-15. Ita No.2477/Pun/2024 [A]

Section 143(3)Section 144Section 154Section 244ASection 246ASection 250Section 90

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for A.Y.2014-15; dated 27.09.2024. The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal : “1] The learned CIT(A) erred in using same statement of facts and findings for Assessment Years 2011-12 and 2014-15 whereas the statement of facts and findings are not relevant at all for Assessment Year

SHRIMADURJIT SEVA KENDRA,PUNE vs. THE ITO, WARD 8(3), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2276/PUN/2025[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Nov 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No.2276/Pun/2025 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2013-14 Shrimadurjit Seva Kendra, V The Income Tax Officer, S.No.117/1, Chowisawdi, S. Ward-8(3), Pune. Haveli, Pune – 412105. Pan: Absfs4340L Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By None Revenue By Shri Amit Bobde –Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 19/11/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 28/11/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: In This Case, Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Additional/Joint Commisioner Of Income Tax(Appeal), Panaji Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For The A.Y.2013-14 Dated 31.07.2025. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal : “1. The Learned Addl./Jt.Cit(A), Panaji Erred In Law & On Facts In Dismissing Appellant'S Appeal Without Granting Sufficient Opportunity Of Being Heard. Appellant Assures To Make All The Compliances Before The

Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234ESection 246ASection 250Section 250(4)Section 250(6)Section 251Section 251(1)(a)

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the A.Y.2013-14 dated 31.07.2025. The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal : “1. The learned Addl./Jt.CIT(A), Panaji erred in law and on facts in dismissing appellant's appeal without granting sufficient opportunity of being heard. Appellant assures to make all the compliances before the ITA No.2276/PUN/2025 [A] learned

SALASAR WAREHOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. INOCME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 59/PUN/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Nov 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryand Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.59/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Salasar Warehousing Private The Income Tax Officer, Limited, V Ward-6(1), Pune. F-2,Warehouse, Sr.No.20/2A, S Near Mundhwa Bridge, Kharadi, Pune – 411014. Pan: Aamcs4834C Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Sarvesh Kandelwal – Ar Revenue By Shri M.G.Jasnani – Dr Date Of Hearing 27/09/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 30/11/2023

Section 143(1)Section 250Section 250(4)Section 250(6)Section 251Section 251(1)(a)Section 43B

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for A.Y. 2011-12 on 17/11/2022 emanating from order passed by ld.DCIT(CPC), Bangalore under section 143(1) of the Act. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: Salasar Warehousing Private Limited [A] “1. On facts and circumstances prevailing in the case and as per provisions and scheme

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AURANGABAD vs. DHANANJAY BABRUVAN KENDER, BEED

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1032/PUN/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2019-20 Dcit, Aurangabad Dhananjay Babruvan Kender Bunglow No.69, Yogeshwari Nagari Vs. Ring Road, Ambajogai, Beed – 431517 Pan: Bwlpk1384D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Hari Krishan Department By : Shri Amol Khairnar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 27-11-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 09-12-2025 O R D E R Per R.K. Panda, Vp:

For Appellant: Shri Hari KrishanFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 153ASection 69Section 69C

TDS of Rs.65,54,172/- was deducted. However, the assessee has offered receipts to the tune of Rs.10,44,63,302/-in return of income filed u/s 139 of the Act. 3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld.CIT (A) has erred in not taking cognizance of seized material seized during

ELECTRONICA FINANCE LIMITED,PUNE vs. D.C.I.T, CIRCLE-1(1), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2629/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune24 Apr 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2629/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2018-19 Electronica Finance Limited, V The Dcit, “Audumber”, 101/1, S Circle-1(1), Pune. Erandwane, Dr.Ketkar Road, Pune – 411004. Pan: Aaace4577B Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Kishor B Phadke – Ar Revenue By Shri Ramnath P Murkunde – Dr Date Of Hearing 22/04/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 24/04/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; Dated 19.12.2023 For Assessment Year 2018-19. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :

Section 143(3)Section 246ASection 250Section 250(4)Section 250(6)Section 251Section 251(1)(a)

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; dated 19.12.2023 for Assessment Year 2018-19. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal : ITA No.2629/PUN/2024 [A] “1. The learned CIT(A), NFAC erred in law and on facts in confirming the total income at Rs.34,61,09,145 instead of returned income of Rs.31

RAVINDRA BHAUSAHEB MADHAVAI ,NASHIK vs. ITO WARD 1(1), NASHIK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1737/PUN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Nov 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1737/Pun/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 250

250 (Bom.) held that in the matter of condonation of delay an overall view in the larger interest of justice has to be taken. None should be deprived of an adjudication on merits unless the Court of law or the Tribunal/Appellate Authority finds that the litigant has deliberately and intentionally delayed filing of the appeal, that he is careless, negligent

M/S KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD,PUNE vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-7, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 704/PUN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreassessment Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil S PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkende
Section 143(2)Section 40Section 43C

4) of section 43CA of the Act, no addition is called for since a part of the consideration has been received by cheque on the basis of agreement and the sale deeds were registered on the basis of value mentioned in the agreement. We, therefore, set aside the order of the CIT(A) / NFAC and direct the Assessing Officer

MR. YOGESH KULTHE,AIROLI, NAVI MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, PANVEL, DIST. RAIGAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 940/PUN/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Jul 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.940/Pun/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11

For Respondent: Shri Manoj Kumar Tripathi
Section 139(1)Section 144Section 148Section 282(1)

TDS deduction etc.. 6. On the other hand, the ld. Departmental Representative placing reliance on the orders of the authorities submit that no interference by this Tribunal is called for 7. We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. Admittedly, the AO also completed the assessment u/s.144 r.w.s.147 of the Act. Further, we find that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS,, PUNE vs. M/S. VODAFONE IDEA LTD, (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD), PUNE

Appeals are dismissed in above terms

ITA 734/PUN/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jul 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm & Shri Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.729 To 735/Pun/2019 ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2013-14 To 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Sardar Singh Meena
Section 194HSection 201Section 201(1)

250(4) of the I.T. Act, 1961....” 5.1.3 In response to the same, the DCIT (TDS), Pune vide letter dated 18.01.2019 forwarded through the Addl. CIT (TDS) Range, Pune and received in this office on 22.01.2019 had sent a report inter-alia as below :- “2. Your office has directed to verify the issue of commission in light of Pune ITATs

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS,, PUNE vs. M/S. VODAFONE IDEA LTD, (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD),, PUNE

Appeals are dismissed in above terms

ITA 729/PUN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm & Shri Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.729 To 735/Pun/2019 ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2013-14 To 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Sardar Singh Meena
Section 194HSection 201Section 201(1)

250(4) of the I.T. Act, 1961....” 5.1.3 In response to the same, the DCIT (TDS), Pune vide letter dated 18.01.2019 forwarded through the Addl. CIT (TDS) Range, Pune and received in this office on 22.01.2019 had sent a report inter-alia as below :- “2. Your office has directed to verify the issue of commission in light of Pune ITATs

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS,, PUNE vs. M/S. VODAFONE IDEA LTD, (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS IDEA CELLULAR LTD),, PUNE

Appeals are dismissed in above terms

ITA 730/PUN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm & Shri Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.729 To 735/Pun/2019 ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2013-14 To 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Sardar Singh Meena
Section 194HSection 201Section 201(1)

250(4) of the I.T. Act, 1961....” 5.1.3 In response to the same, the DCIT (TDS), Pune vide letter dated 18.01.2019 forwarded through the Addl. CIT (TDS) Range, Pune and received in this office on 22.01.2019 had sent a report inter-alia as below :- “2. Your office has directed to verify the issue of commission in light of Pune ITATs

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS,, PUNE vs. M/S. VODAFONE IDEA LTD, (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS IDEA CELLULAR LTD),, PUNE

Appeals are dismissed in above terms

ITA 735/PUN/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jul 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm & Shri Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.729 To 735/Pun/2019 ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2013-14 To 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Sardar Singh Meena
Section 194HSection 201Section 201(1)

250(4) of the I.T. Act, 1961....” 5.1.3 In response to the same, the DCIT (TDS), Pune vide letter dated 18.01.2019 forwarded through the Addl. CIT (TDS) Range, Pune and received in this office on 22.01.2019 had sent a report inter-alia as below :- “2. Your office has directed to verify the issue of commission in light of Pune ITATs

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS,, PUNE vs. M/S. VODAFONE IDEA LTD, (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD), PUNE

Appeals are dismissed in above terms

ITA 733/PUN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jul 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm & Shri Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.729 To 735/Pun/2019 ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2013-14 To 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Sardar Singh Meena
Section 194HSection 201Section 201(1)

250(4) of the I.T. Act, 1961....” 5.1.3 In response to the same, the DCIT (TDS), Pune vide letter dated 18.01.2019 forwarded through the Addl. CIT (TDS) Range, Pune and received in this office on 22.01.2019 had sent a report inter-alia as below :- “2. Your office has directed to verify the issue of commission in light of Pune ITATs

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS,, PUNE vs. M/S. VODAFONE IDEA LTD, (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD), PUNE

Appeals are dismissed in above terms

ITA 731/PUN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm & Shri Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.729 To 735/Pun/2019 ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2013-14 To 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Sardar Singh Meena
Section 194HSection 201Section 201(1)

250(4) of the I.T. Act, 1961....” 5.1.3 In response to the same, the DCIT (TDS), Pune vide letter dated 18.01.2019 forwarded through the Addl. CIT (TDS) Range, Pune and received in this office on 22.01.2019 had sent a report inter-alia as below :- “2. Your office has directed to verify the issue of commission in light of Pune ITATs

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS,, PUNE vs. M/S. VODAFONE IDEA LTD, (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS IDEA CELLULAR LTD),, PUNE

Appeals are dismissed in above terms

ITA 732/PUN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jul 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm & Shri Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.729 To 735/Pun/2019 ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2013-14 To 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Sardar Singh Meena
Section 194HSection 201Section 201(1)

250(4) of the I.T. Act, 1961....” 5.1.3 In response to the same, the DCIT (TDS), Pune vide letter dated 18.01.2019 forwarded through the Addl. CIT (TDS) Range, Pune and received in this office on 22.01.2019 had sent a report inter-alia as below :- “2. Your office has directed to verify the issue of commission in light of Pune ITATs