DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AURANGABAD vs. DHANANJAY BABRUVAN KENDER, BEED
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 1032/PUN/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Dec 2025AY 2019-20
Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2019-20 Dcit, Aurangabad Dhananjay Babruvan Kender Bunglow No.69, Yogeshwari Nagari Vs. Ring Road, Ambajogai, Beed – 431517 Pan: Bwlpk1384D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Hari Krishan Department By : Shri Amol Khairnar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 27-11-2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 09-12-2025 O R D E R Per R.K. Panda, Vp:
For Appellant: Shri Hari KrishanFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 153ASection 69Section 69C
TDS of Rs.65,54,172/- was deducted. However, the assessee has offered receipts to the tune of Rs.10,44,63,302/-in return of income filed u/s 139 of the Act.
3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld.CIT (A) has erred in not taking cognizance of seized material seized during