DCIT, SWARGATE PUNE vs. CUMMINS INDIA LTD , PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

234D if applicable. Issue demand noticed and challan accordingly. Issue Penalty\nnotice under section 274 r.w.s.270A of the Income Tax Act 1961, separately for mis-\nreporting and under-reporting of income.\nAggrieved by the assessment order, assessee now is in\nappeal ITA No.632/PUN/2022 before this Tribunal raising the\nfollowing grounds of appeal:-\n“Based on the facts and circumstances

CUMMINS INDIA LIMITED,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1(1),, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

234D if applicable. Issue demand noticed and challan accordingly. Issue Penalty\nnotice under section 274 r.w.s.270A of the Income Tax Act 1961, separately for mis-\nreporting and under-reporting of income.\n\nAggrieved by the assessment order, assessee now is in\nappeal ITA No.632/PUN/2022 before this Tribunal raising the\nfollowing grounds of appeal:-\n\n“Based on the facts

APAASSO MALI,PUNE vs. ITO 11(1), SWARGATE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

TDS) amounting to 3,48,250/-, which was deducted from the income of the Appellant. Ground No.5 5.1 On the facts and circumstances of the case the LD AO erred in invoking section 69 to tax undisclosed investments when the appellant is assessed under section 44AD on presumptive basis. 5.2 On the facts and circumstances of the case

DISCOVERY DIGITAL NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED,NASHIK vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1 , NASHIK

234D of the Act. The assessee requested the\nLd. AO vide letter dated 24.08.2021 to provide a copy of the rectification order\ndated 02.05.2018 however it was not provided. Thereafter, on 27.08.2021, the\nassessee filed a detailed legal submission on non-applicability of Circular No.\n9/2015 (supra) to the assessee's case along with other contentions raised in\nsupport

UDAY JAWAHAR KOTNIS,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, PUNE

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.01/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Uday Jawahar Kotnis, Vs. Ito, Ward-13(2), Pune. 601 A Building, Waterfront, Kalyani Nagar, Pune- 411001. Pan : Abtpk0141N Appellant Respondent Assessee By Shri V. L. Jain : Revenue By : Shri Sourabh Nayak Date Of Hearing : 29.05.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 10.07.2024 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 22.11.2023 Passed By Ld Cit(A)/Nfac, Delhi For The Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. The Appellant Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1. The Learned Ao Has Erred On Facts & In Law In Making An Addition Of Rs.1,75,00,000/- As Commission Under The Head Income From Other Sources. 2. The Appellant Craves Leave To Amend Or Alter Any Of The Grounds Of Appeal Or Add To The Same, If Deemed Necessary.

section 2(27) of the IT Act as well as 53A of the Transfer of Properties Act, 1882, 4. as per the plea of the assessee that since the transfer of land was not materialized, the amount is liable to paid to the owner or the purchaser; had it been the case, the assessee should not have kept the amount

LATA MANGESHKAR MEDICAL FOUNDATION,ERANDWANE,PUNE vs. DCIT-EXEMPTIONS-PUNE, SWARGATE,PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Dr. Dipak P. Ripotelata Mangeshkar Medical Vs Dcit (Exemptions), Foundation, Deenanath Pune. Mangeshkar Hospital, D.No. 8,13, Erandwane, Pune (Mh) Pan: Aaatl 1944 N Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Nikhil S. Pathak, Adv. Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde,Dr Date Of Hearing : 01/04/2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 03/04/2024 Order Per Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm: This Appeal Preferred By The Assessee Emanates From The Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi, Dated 11.08.2023 For A.Y.2018-19 As Per The Following Grounds Of Appeal:-

TDS deducted and accordingly, the order passed by the learned CIT(A) is bad in law. Lata Mangeshkar Medical Foundation 3] The learned CIT(A) erred in not appreciating that the learned AO had granted interest u/s 244A from the date of filing the return i.e. from 05.10.2018 till the date of order passed u/s 143(1) i.e., 16.11.2019 without